Cargando…
Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods
The accurate duplicate cast obtained from a single impression reduces the profession clinical time, patient inconvenience, and extra material cost. The stainless steel working cast model assembly consisting of two abutments and one pontic area was fabricated. Two sets of six each custom aluminum tra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7414737 |
_version_ | 1782490307954212864 |
---|---|
author | Haralur, Satheesh B. Saad Toman, Majed Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah |
author_facet | Haralur, Satheesh B. Saad Toman, Majed Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah |
author_sort | Haralur, Satheesh B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The accurate duplicate cast obtained from a single impression reduces the profession clinical time, patient inconvenience, and extra material cost. The stainless steel working cast model assembly consisting of two abutments and one pontic area was fabricated. Two sets of six each custom aluminum trays were fabricated, with five mm spacer and two mm spacer. The impression methods evaluated during the study were additional silicone putty reline (two steps), heavy-light body (one step), monophase (one step), and polyether (one step). Type IV gypsum casts were poured at the interval of one hour, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. The resultant cast was measured with traveling microscope for the comparative dimensional accuracy. The data obtained were subjected to Analysis of Variance test at significance level <0.05. The die obtained from two-step putty reline impression techniques had the percentage of variation for the height −0.36 to −0.97%, while diameter was increased by 0.40–0.90%. The values for one-step heavy-light body impression dies, additional silicone monophase impressions, and polyether were −0.73 to −1.21%, −1.34%, and −1.46% for the height and 0.50–0.80%, 1.20%, and −1.30% for the width, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5206852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52068522017-01-17 Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods Haralur, Satheesh B. Saad Toman, Majed Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah Int J Dent Research Article The accurate duplicate cast obtained from a single impression reduces the profession clinical time, patient inconvenience, and extra material cost. The stainless steel working cast model assembly consisting of two abutments and one pontic area was fabricated. Two sets of six each custom aluminum trays were fabricated, with five mm spacer and two mm spacer. The impression methods evaluated during the study were additional silicone putty reline (two steps), heavy-light body (one step), monophase (one step), and polyether (one step). Type IV gypsum casts were poured at the interval of one hour, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. The resultant cast was measured with traveling microscope for the comparative dimensional accuracy. The data obtained were subjected to Analysis of Variance test at significance level <0.05. The die obtained from two-step putty reline impression techniques had the percentage of variation for the height −0.36 to −0.97%, while diameter was increased by 0.40–0.90%. The values for one-step heavy-light body impression dies, additional silicone monophase impressions, and polyether were −0.73 to −1.21%, −1.34%, and −1.46% for the height and 0.50–0.80%, 1.20%, and −1.30% for the width, respectively. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5206852/ /pubmed/28096815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7414737 Text en Copyright © 2016 Satheesh B. Haralur et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Haralur, Satheesh B. Saad Toman, Majed Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods |
title | Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods |
title_full | Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods |
title_short | Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods |
title_sort | accuracy of multiple pour cast from various elastomer impression methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7414737 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haralursatheeshb accuracyofmultiplepourcastfromvariouselastomerimpressionmethods AT saadtomanmajed accuracyofmultiplepourcastfromvariouselastomerimpressionmethods AT alialshahraniabdullah accuracyofmultiplepourcastfromvariouselastomerimpressionmethods AT alialqarniabdullah accuracyofmultiplepourcastfromvariouselastomerimpressionmethods |