Cargando…

Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods

The accurate duplicate cast obtained from a single impression reduces the profession clinical time, patient inconvenience, and extra material cost. The stainless steel working cast model assembly consisting of two abutments and one pontic area was fabricated. Two sets of six each custom aluminum tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haralur, Satheesh B., Saad Toman, Majed, Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah, Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7414737
_version_ 1782490307954212864
author Haralur, Satheesh B.
Saad Toman, Majed
Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah
Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah
author_facet Haralur, Satheesh B.
Saad Toman, Majed
Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah
Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah
author_sort Haralur, Satheesh B.
collection PubMed
description The accurate duplicate cast obtained from a single impression reduces the profession clinical time, patient inconvenience, and extra material cost. The stainless steel working cast model assembly consisting of two abutments and one pontic area was fabricated. Two sets of six each custom aluminum trays were fabricated, with five mm spacer and two mm spacer. The impression methods evaluated during the study were additional silicone putty reline (two steps), heavy-light body (one step), monophase (one step), and polyether (one step). Type IV gypsum casts were poured at the interval of one hour, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. The resultant cast was measured with traveling microscope for the comparative dimensional accuracy. The data obtained were subjected to Analysis of Variance test at significance level <0.05. The die obtained from two-step putty reline impression techniques had the percentage of variation for the height −0.36 to −0.97%, while diameter was increased by 0.40–0.90%. The values for one-step heavy-light body impression dies, additional silicone monophase impressions, and polyether were −0.73 to −1.21%, −1.34%, and −1.46% for the height and 0.50–0.80%, 1.20%, and −1.30% for the width, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5206852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52068522017-01-17 Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods Haralur, Satheesh B. Saad Toman, Majed Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah Int J Dent Research Article The accurate duplicate cast obtained from a single impression reduces the profession clinical time, patient inconvenience, and extra material cost. The stainless steel working cast model assembly consisting of two abutments and one pontic area was fabricated. Two sets of six each custom aluminum trays were fabricated, with five mm spacer and two mm spacer. The impression methods evaluated during the study were additional silicone putty reline (two steps), heavy-light body (one step), monophase (one step), and polyether (one step). Type IV gypsum casts were poured at the interval of one hour, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. The resultant cast was measured with traveling microscope for the comparative dimensional accuracy. The data obtained were subjected to Analysis of Variance test at significance level <0.05. The die obtained from two-step putty reline impression techniques had the percentage of variation for the height −0.36 to −0.97%, while diameter was increased by 0.40–0.90%. The values for one-step heavy-light body impression dies, additional silicone monophase impressions, and polyether were −0.73 to −1.21%, −1.34%, and −1.46% for the height and 0.50–0.80%, 1.20%, and −1.30% for the width, respectively. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5206852/ /pubmed/28096815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7414737 Text en Copyright © 2016 Satheesh B. Haralur et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haralur, Satheesh B.
Saad Toman, Majed
Ali Al-Shahrani, Abdullah
Ali Al-Qarni, Abdullah
Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods
title Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods
title_full Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods
title_fullStr Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods
title_short Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods
title_sort accuracy of multiple pour cast from various elastomer impression methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7414737
work_keys_str_mv AT haralursatheeshb accuracyofmultiplepourcastfromvariouselastomerimpressionmethods
AT saadtomanmajed accuracyofmultiplepourcastfromvariouselastomerimpressionmethods
AT alialshahraniabdullah accuracyofmultiplepourcastfromvariouselastomerimpressionmethods
AT alialqarniabdullah accuracyofmultiplepourcastfromvariouselastomerimpressionmethods