Cargando…
Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review
INTRODUCTION: Coaching is proposed to raise a patient’s awareness and responsibility for their health behaviour change by transforming the professional–patient relationship. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on how coaching can assist in weight loss and improve a patient’s state of heal...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096687 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S113874 |
_version_ | 1782490347608211456 |
---|---|
author | Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda Aguiar Pereira, Caroline Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero |
author_facet | Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda Aguiar Pereira, Caroline Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero |
author_sort | Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Coaching is proposed to raise a patient’s awareness and responsibility for their health behaviour change by transforming the professional–patient relationship. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on how coaching can assist in weight loss and improve a patient’s state of health. METHODOLOGY: An integrative literature search was performed using PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. We selected articles that were published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish over the last 10 years. Data analysis was performed using a validated data collection instrument. RESULTS: Among the 289 articles identified in the search, 276 were excluded because they did not address the leading research question, their full texts were not available on the Internet, or they were duplicate publications. Therefore, for the analysis, we selected 13 articles that we classified as randomized clinical studies (46.15%; n=6), cohort studies (30.76%; n=4), cross-sectional studies (7.69%; n=1), case studies (7.69%; n=1), and review articles (7.69%; n=1). Joint intervention (combined in-person and telecoaching sessions) constituted the majority of session types. The use of technical coaching was superior in reducing anthropometric measurements and increasing the levels of motivation and personal satisfaction compared with formal health education alone. CONCLUSION: Coaching is an efficient, cost-effective method for combining formal education and treatment of health in the weight-loss process. Additional randomized studies are needed to demonstrate its effectiveness with respect to chronic disease indicators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5207339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52073392017-01-17 Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda Aguiar Pereira, Caroline Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Review INTRODUCTION: Coaching is proposed to raise a patient’s awareness and responsibility for their health behaviour change by transforming the professional–patient relationship. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on how coaching can assist in weight loss and improve a patient’s state of health. METHODOLOGY: An integrative literature search was performed using PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. We selected articles that were published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish over the last 10 years. Data analysis was performed using a validated data collection instrument. RESULTS: Among the 289 articles identified in the search, 276 were excluded because they did not address the leading research question, their full texts were not available on the Internet, or they were duplicate publications. Therefore, for the analysis, we selected 13 articles that we classified as randomized clinical studies (46.15%; n=6), cohort studies (30.76%; n=4), cross-sectional studies (7.69%; n=1), case studies (7.69%; n=1), and review articles (7.69%; n=1). Joint intervention (combined in-person and telecoaching sessions) constituted the majority of session types. The use of technical coaching was superior in reducing anthropometric measurements and increasing the levels of motivation and personal satisfaction compared with formal health education alone. CONCLUSION: Coaching is an efficient, cost-effective method for combining formal education and treatment of health in the weight-loss process. Additional randomized studies are needed to demonstrate its effectiveness with respect to chronic disease indicators. Dove Medical Press 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5207339/ /pubmed/28096687 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S113874 Text en © 2017 Muñoz Obino et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda Aguiar Pereira, Caroline Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review |
title | Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review |
title_full | Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review |
title_fullStr | Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review |
title_short | Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review |
title_sort | coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096687 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S113874 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munozobinokarenfernanda coachingandbarrierstoweightlossanintegrativereview AT aguiarpereiracaroline coachingandbarrierstoweightlossanintegrativereview AT caronlienertrafaelasiviero coachingandbarrierstoweightlossanintegrativereview |