Cargando…

Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review

INTRODUCTION: Coaching is proposed to raise a patient’s awareness and responsibility for their health behaviour change by transforming the professional–patient relationship. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on how coaching can assist in weight loss and improve a patient’s state of heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda, Aguiar Pereira, Caroline, Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096687
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S113874
_version_ 1782490347608211456
author Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda
Aguiar Pereira, Caroline
Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero
author_facet Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda
Aguiar Pereira, Caroline
Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero
author_sort Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Coaching is proposed to raise a patient’s awareness and responsibility for their health behaviour change by transforming the professional–patient relationship. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on how coaching can assist in weight loss and improve a patient’s state of health. METHODOLOGY: An integrative literature search was performed using PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. We selected articles that were published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish over the last 10 years. Data analysis was performed using a validated data collection instrument. RESULTS: Among the 289 articles identified in the search, 276 were excluded because they did not address the leading research question, their full texts were not available on the Internet, or they were duplicate publications. Therefore, for the analysis, we selected 13 articles that we classified as randomized clinical studies (46.15%; n=6), cohort studies (30.76%; n=4), cross-sectional studies (7.69%; n=1), case studies (7.69%; n=1), and review articles (7.69%; n=1). Joint intervention (combined in-person and telecoaching sessions) constituted the majority of session types. The use of technical coaching was superior in reducing anthropometric measurements and increasing the levels of motivation and personal satisfaction compared with formal health education alone. CONCLUSION: Coaching is an efficient, cost-effective method for combining formal education and treatment of health in the weight-loss process. Additional randomized studies are needed to demonstrate its effectiveness with respect to chronic disease indicators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5207339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52073392017-01-17 Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda Aguiar Pereira, Caroline Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Review INTRODUCTION: Coaching is proposed to raise a patient’s awareness and responsibility for their health behaviour change by transforming the professional–patient relationship. OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on how coaching can assist in weight loss and improve a patient’s state of health. METHODOLOGY: An integrative literature search was performed using PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. We selected articles that were published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish over the last 10 years. Data analysis was performed using a validated data collection instrument. RESULTS: Among the 289 articles identified in the search, 276 were excluded because they did not address the leading research question, their full texts were not available on the Internet, or they were duplicate publications. Therefore, for the analysis, we selected 13 articles that we classified as randomized clinical studies (46.15%; n=6), cohort studies (30.76%; n=4), cross-sectional studies (7.69%; n=1), case studies (7.69%; n=1), and review articles (7.69%; n=1). Joint intervention (combined in-person and telecoaching sessions) constituted the majority of session types. The use of technical coaching was superior in reducing anthropometric measurements and increasing the levels of motivation and personal satisfaction compared with formal health education alone. CONCLUSION: Coaching is an efficient, cost-effective method for combining formal education and treatment of health in the weight-loss process. Additional randomized studies are needed to demonstrate its effectiveness with respect to chronic disease indicators. Dove Medical Press 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5207339/ /pubmed/28096687 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S113874 Text en © 2017 Muñoz Obino et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Muñoz Obino, Karen Fernanda
Aguiar Pereira, Caroline
Caron-Lienert, Rafaela Siviero
Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review
title Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review
title_full Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review
title_fullStr Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review
title_short Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review
title_sort coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28096687
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S113874
work_keys_str_mv AT munozobinokarenfernanda coachingandbarrierstoweightlossanintegrativereview
AT aguiarpereiracaroline coachingandbarrierstoweightlossanintegrativereview
AT caronlienertrafaelasiviero coachingandbarrierstoweightlossanintegrativereview