Cargando…

The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics

Prey often evolve defences to deter predators, such as noxious chemicals including toxins. Toxic species often advertise their defence to potential predators by distinctive sensory signals. Predators learn to associate toxicity with the signals of these so-called aposematic prey, and may avoid them...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halpin, Christina G., Skelhorn, John, Rowe, Candy, Ruxton, Graeme D., Higginson, Andrew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28045959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169043
_version_ 1782490357177516032
author Halpin, Christina G.
Skelhorn, John
Rowe, Candy
Ruxton, Graeme D.
Higginson, Andrew D.
author_facet Halpin, Christina G.
Skelhorn, John
Rowe, Candy
Ruxton, Graeme D.
Higginson, Andrew D.
author_sort Halpin, Christina G.
collection PubMed
description Prey often evolve defences to deter predators, such as noxious chemicals including toxins. Toxic species often advertise their defence to potential predators by distinctive sensory signals. Predators learn to associate toxicity with the signals of these so-called aposematic prey, and may avoid them in future. In turn, this selects for mildly toxic prey to mimic the appearance of more toxic prey. Empirical evidence shows that mimicry could be either beneficial (‘Mullerian’) or detrimental (‘quasi-Batesian’) to the highly toxic prey, but the factors determining which are unknown. Here, we use state-dependent models to explore how tri-trophic interactions could influence the evolution of prey defences. We consider how predation risk affects predators’ optimal foraging strategies on aposematic prey, and explore the resultant impact this has on mimicry dynamics between unequally defended species. In addition, we also investigate how the potential energetic cost of metabolising a toxin can alter the benefits to eating toxic prey and thus impact on predators’ foraging decisions. Our model predicts that both how predators perceive their own predation risk, and the cost of detoxification, can have significant, sometimes counterintuitive, effects on the foraging decisions of predators. For example, in some conditions predators should: (i) avoid prey they know to be undefended, (ii) eat more mildly toxic prey as detoxification costs increase, (iii) increase their intake of highly toxic prey as the abundance of undefended prey increases. These effects mean that the relationship between a mimic and its model can qualitatively depend on the density of alternative prey and the cost of metabolising toxins. In addition, these effects are mediated by the predators’ own predation risk, which demonstrates that, higher trophic levels than previously considered can have fundamental impacts on interactions among aposematic prey species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5207405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52074052017-01-19 The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics Halpin, Christina G. Skelhorn, John Rowe, Candy Ruxton, Graeme D. Higginson, Andrew D. PLoS One Research Article Prey often evolve defences to deter predators, such as noxious chemicals including toxins. Toxic species often advertise their defence to potential predators by distinctive sensory signals. Predators learn to associate toxicity with the signals of these so-called aposematic prey, and may avoid them in future. In turn, this selects for mildly toxic prey to mimic the appearance of more toxic prey. Empirical evidence shows that mimicry could be either beneficial (‘Mullerian’) or detrimental (‘quasi-Batesian’) to the highly toxic prey, but the factors determining which are unknown. Here, we use state-dependent models to explore how tri-trophic interactions could influence the evolution of prey defences. We consider how predation risk affects predators’ optimal foraging strategies on aposematic prey, and explore the resultant impact this has on mimicry dynamics between unequally defended species. In addition, we also investigate how the potential energetic cost of metabolising a toxin can alter the benefits to eating toxic prey and thus impact on predators’ foraging decisions. Our model predicts that both how predators perceive their own predation risk, and the cost of detoxification, can have significant, sometimes counterintuitive, effects on the foraging decisions of predators. For example, in some conditions predators should: (i) avoid prey they know to be undefended, (ii) eat more mildly toxic prey as detoxification costs increase, (iii) increase their intake of highly toxic prey as the abundance of undefended prey increases. These effects mean that the relationship between a mimic and its model can qualitatively depend on the density of alternative prey and the cost of metabolising toxins. In addition, these effects are mediated by the predators’ own predation risk, which demonstrates that, higher trophic levels than previously considered can have fundamental impacts on interactions among aposematic prey species. Public Library of Science 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5207405/ /pubmed/28045959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169043 Text en © 2017 Halpin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Halpin, Christina G.
Skelhorn, John
Rowe, Candy
Ruxton, Graeme D.
Higginson, Andrew D.
The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics
title The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics
title_full The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics
title_fullStr The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics
title_short The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics
title_sort impact of detoxification costs and predation risk on foraging: implications for mimicry dynamics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28045959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169043
work_keys_str_mv AT halpinchristinag theimpactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT skelhornjohn theimpactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT rowecandy theimpactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT ruxtongraemed theimpactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT higginsonandrewd theimpactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT halpinchristinag impactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT skelhornjohn impactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT rowecandy impactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT ruxtongraemed impactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics
AT higginsonandrewd impactofdetoxificationcostsandpredationriskonforagingimplicationsformimicrydynamics