Cargando…
Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: Pedometers can increase walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels, but their effectiveness with or without support has not been rigorously evaluated. We assessed the effectiveness of a pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive adults, delivered...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28045890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002210 |
_version_ | 1782490404213489664 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Tess Kerry, Sally M. Limb, Elizabeth S. Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Ussher, Michael Whincup, Peter H. Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Furness, Cheryl Anokye, Nana Ibison, Judith DeWilde, Steve David, Lee Howard, Emma Dale, Rebecca Smith, Jaime Cook, Derek G. |
author_facet | Harris, Tess Kerry, Sally M. Limb, Elizabeth S. Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Ussher, Michael Whincup, Peter H. Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Furness, Cheryl Anokye, Nana Ibison, Judith DeWilde, Steve David, Lee Howard, Emma Dale, Rebecca Smith, Jaime Cook, Derek G. |
author_sort | Harris, Tess |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pedometers can increase walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels, but their effectiveness with or without support has not been rigorously evaluated. We assessed the effectiveness of a pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive adults, delivered by post or through primary care nurse-supported physical activity (PA) consultations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial was randomised by household, with 12-mo follow-up, in seven London, United Kingdom, primary care practices. Eleven thousand fifteen randomly selected patients aged 45–75 y without PA contraindications were invited. Five hundred forty-eight self-reporting achieving PA guidelines were excluded. One thousand twenty-three people from 922 households were randomised between 2012–2013 to one of the following groups: usual care (n = 338); postal pedometer intervention (n = 339); and nurse-supported pedometer intervention (n = 346). Of these, 956 participants (93%) provided outcome data (usual care n = 323, postal n = 312, nurse-supported n = 321). Both intervention groups received pedometers, 12-wk walking programmes, and PA diaries. The nurse group was offered three PA consultations. Primary and main secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to 12 mo in average daily step-counts and time in MVPA (in ≥10-min bouts), respectively, measured objectively by accelerometry. Only statisticians were masked to group. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Average baseline daily step-count was 7,479 (standard deviation [s.d.] 2,671), and average time in MVPA bouts was 94 (s.d. 102) min/wk. At 12 mo, mean steps/d, with s.d. in parentheses, were as follows: control 7,246 (2,671); postal 8,010 (2,922); and nurse support 8,131 (3,228). PA increased in both intervention groups compared with the control group; additional steps/d were 642 for postal (95% CI 329–955) and 677 for nurse support (95% CI 365–989); additional MVPA in bouts (min/wk) were 33 for postal (95% CI 17–49) and 35 for nurse support (95% CI 19–51). There were no significant differences between the two interventions at 12 mo. The 10% (1,023/10,467) recruitment rate was a study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: A primary care pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds increased step-counts by about one-tenth and time in MVPA in bouts by about one-third. Nurse and postal delivery achieved similar 12-mo PA outcomes. A primary care pedometer intervention delivered by post or with minimal support could help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5207642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52076422017-01-25 Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial Harris, Tess Kerry, Sally M. Limb, Elizabeth S. Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Ussher, Michael Whincup, Peter H. Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Furness, Cheryl Anokye, Nana Ibison, Judith DeWilde, Steve David, Lee Howard, Emma Dale, Rebecca Smith, Jaime Cook, Derek G. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Pedometers can increase walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels, but their effectiveness with or without support has not been rigorously evaluated. We assessed the effectiveness of a pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive adults, delivered by post or through primary care nurse-supported physical activity (PA) consultations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial was randomised by household, with 12-mo follow-up, in seven London, United Kingdom, primary care practices. Eleven thousand fifteen randomly selected patients aged 45–75 y without PA contraindications were invited. Five hundred forty-eight self-reporting achieving PA guidelines were excluded. One thousand twenty-three people from 922 households were randomised between 2012–2013 to one of the following groups: usual care (n = 338); postal pedometer intervention (n = 339); and nurse-supported pedometer intervention (n = 346). Of these, 956 participants (93%) provided outcome data (usual care n = 323, postal n = 312, nurse-supported n = 321). Both intervention groups received pedometers, 12-wk walking programmes, and PA diaries. The nurse group was offered three PA consultations. Primary and main secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to 12 mo in average daily step-counts and time in MVPA (in ≥10-min bouts), respectively, measured objectively by accelerometry. Only statisticians were masked to group. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Average baseline daily step-count was 7,479 (standard deviation [s.d.] 2,671), and average time in MVPA bouts was 94 (s.d. 102) min/wk. At 12 mo, mean steps/d, with s.d. in parentheses, were as follows: control 7,246 (2,671); postal 8,010 (2,922); and nurse support 8,131 (3,228). PA increased in both intervention groups compared with the control group; additional steps/d were 642 for postal (95% CI 329–955) and 677 for nurse support (95% CI 365–989); additional MVPA in bouts (min/wk) were 33 for postal (95% CI 17–49) and 35 for nurse support (95% CI 19–51). There were no significant differences between the two interventions at 12 mo. The 10% (1,023/10,467) recruitment rate was a study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: A primary care pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds increased step-counts by about one-tenth and time in MVPA in bouts by about one-third. Nurse and postal delivery achieved similar 12-mo PA outcomes. A primary care pedometer intervention delivered by post or with minimal support could help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934. Public Library of Science 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5207642/ /pubmed/28045890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002210 Text en © 2017 Harris et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Harris, Tess Kerry, Sally M. Limb, Elizabeth S. Victor, Christina R. Iliffe, Steve Ussher, Michael Whincup, Peter H. Ekelund, Ulf Fox-Rushby, Julia Furness, Cheryl Anokye, Nana Ibison, Judith DeWilde, Steve David, Lee Howard, Emma Dale, Rebecca Smith, Jaime Cook, Derek G. Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial |
title | Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial |
title_full | Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial |
title_short | Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial |
title_sort | effect of a primary care walking intervention with and without nurse support on physical activity levels in 45- to 75-year-olds: the pedometer and consultation evaluation (pace-up) cluster randomised clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28045890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harristess effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT kerrysallym effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT limbelizabeths effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT victorchristinar effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT iliffesteve effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT usshermichael effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT whincuppeterh effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT ekelundulf effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT foxrushbyjulia effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT furnesscheryl effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT anokyenana effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT ibisonjudith effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT dewildesteve effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT davidlee effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT howardemma effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT dalerebecca effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT smithjaime effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial AT cookderekg effectofaprimarycarewalkinginterventionwithandwithoutnursesupportonphysicalactivitylevelsin45to75yearoldsthepedometerandconsultationevaluationpaceupclusterrandomisedclinicaltrial |