Cargando…

Intensive Patient Education Improves Glycaemic Control in Diabetes Compared to Conventional Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Nigerian Tertiary Care Hospital

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is now a global epidemic, but most cases are now in low- and middle-income countries. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is key to enabling patients to manage their chronic condition and can reduce the occurrence of costly and devastating complications. However, there is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Essien, Okon, Otu, Akaninyene, Umoh, Victor, Enang, Ofem, Hicks, Joseph Paul, Walley, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28045979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168835
_version_ 1782490427678523392
author Essien, Okon
Otu, Akaninyene
Umoh, Victor
Enang, Ofem
Hicks, Joseph Paul
Walley, John
author_facet Essien, Okon
Otu, Akaninyene
Umoh, Victor
Enang, Ofem
Hicks, Joseph Paul
Walley, John
author_sort Essien, Okon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetes is now a global epidemic, but most cases are now in low- and middle-income countries. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is key to enabling patients to manage their chronic condition and can reduce the occurrence of costly and devastating complications. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of different DSME programmes in resource limited settings. METHODS: We conducted an unblinded, parallel-group, individually-randomised controlled trial at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (Nigeria) to evaluate whether an intensive and systematic DSME programme, using structured guidelines, improved glycaemic control compared to the existing ad hoc patient education (clinical practice was unchanged). Eligible patients (≥18 years, HbA(1c) > 8.5% and physically able to participate) were randomly allocated by permuted block randomisation to participate for six months in either an intensive or conventional education group. The primary outcome was HbA(1c) (%) at six-months. RESULTS: We randomised 59 participants to each group and obtained six-month HbA1c outcomes from 53 and 51 participants in the intensive and conventional education groups, respectively. Intensive group participants had a mean six-month HbA(1c) (%) of 8.4 (95% CI: 8 to 8.9), while participants in the conventional education group had a mean six-month HbA(1c) (%) of 10.2 (95% CI: 9.8 to 10.7). The difference was statistically (P < 0.0001) and clinically significant, with intensive group participants having HbA(1c) outcomes on average -1.8 (95% CI: -2.4 to -1.2) percentage points lower than conventional group participants. Results were robust to adjustment for a range of covariates and multiple imputation of missing outcome data. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a structured, guideline-based DSME intervention in a LMIC setting versus a pragmatic comparator. The intervention is potentially replicable at other levels of the Nigerian healthcare system and in other LMICs, where nurses/diabetes educators can run the programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR20130200047835
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5207750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52077502017-01-19 Intensive Patient Education Improves Glycaemic Control in Diabetes Compared to Conventional Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Nigerian Tertiary Care Hospital Essien, Okon Otu, Akaninyene Umoh, Victor Enang, Ofem Hicks, Joseph Paul Walley, John PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diabetes is now a global epidemic, but most cases are now in low- and middle-income countries. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is key to enabling patients to manage their chronic condition and can reduce the occurrence of costly and devastating complications. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of different DSME programmes in resource limited settings. METHODS: We conducted an unblinded, parallel-group, individually-randomised controlled trial at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (Nigeria) to evaluate whether an intensive and systematic DSME programme, using structured guidelines, improved glycaemic control compared to the existing ad hoc patient education (clinical practice was unchanged). Eligible patients (≥18 years, HbA(1c) > 8.5% and physically able to participate) were randomly allocated by permuted block randomisation to participate for six months in either an intensive or conventional education group. The primary outcome was HbA(1c) (%) at six-months. RESULTS: We randomised 59 participants to each group and obtained six-month HbA1c outcomes from 53 and 51 participants in the intensive and conventional education groups, respectively. Intensive group participants had a mean six-month HbA(1c) (%) of 8.4 (95% CI: 8 to 8.9), while participants in the conventional education group had a mean six-month HbA(1c) (%) of 10.2 (95% CI: 9.8 to 10.7). The difference was statistically (P < 0.0001) and clinically significant, with intensive group participants having HbA(1c) outcomes on average -1.8 (95% CI: -2.4 to -1.2) percentage points lower than conventional group participants. Results were robust to adjustment for a range of covariates and multiple imputation of missing outcome data. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a structured, guideline-based DSME intervention in a LMIC setting versus a pragmatic comparator. The intervention is potentially replicable at other levels of the Nigerian healthcare system and in other LMICs, where nurses/diabetes educators can run the programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR20130200047835 Public Library of Science 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5207750/ /pubmed/28045979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168835 Text en © 2017 Essien et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Essien, Okon
Otu, Akaninyene
Umoh, Victor
Enang, Ofem
Hicks, Joseph Paul
Walley, John
Intensive Patient Education Improves Glycaemic Control in Diabetes Compared to Conventional Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Nigerian Tertiary Care Hospital
title Intensive Patient Education Improves Glycaemic Control in Diabetes Compared to Conventional Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Nigerian Tertiary Care Hospital
title_full Intensive Patient Education Improves Glycaemic Control in Diabetes Compared to Conventional Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Nigerian Tertiary Care Hospital
title_fullStr Intensive Patient Education Improves Glycaemic Control in Diabetes Compared to Conventional Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Nigerian Tertiary Care Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Intensive Patient Education Improves Glycaemic Control in Diabetes Compared to Conventional Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Nigerian Tertiary Care Hospital
title_short Intensive Patient Education Improves Glycaemic Control in Diabetes Compared to Conventional Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial in a Nigerian Tertiary Care Hospital
title_sort intensive patient education improves glycaemic control in diabetes compared to conventional education: a randomised controlled trial in a nigerian tertiary care hospital
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28045979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168835
work_keys_str_mv AT essienokon intensivepatienteducationimprovesglycaemiccontrolindiabetescomparedtoconventionaleducationarandomisedcontrolledtrialinanigeriantertiarycarehospital
AT otuakaninyene intensivepatienteducationimprovesglycaemiccontrolindiabetescomparedtoconventionaleducationarandomisedcontrolledtrialinanigeriantertiarycarehospital
AT umohvictor intensivepatienteducationimprovesglycaemiccontrolindiabetescomparedtoconventionaleducationarandomisedcontrolledtrialinanigeriantertiarycarehospital
AT enangofem intensivepatienteducationimprovesglycaemiccontrolindiabetescomparedtoconventionaleducationarandomisedcontrolledtrialinanigeriantertiarycarehospital
AT hicksjosephpaul intensivepatienteducationimprovesglycaemiccontrolindiabetescomparedtoconventionaleducationarandomisedcontrolledtrialinanigeriantertiarycarehospital
AT walleyjohn intensivepatienteducationimprovesglycaemiccontrolindiabetescomparedtoconventionaleducationarandomisedcontrolledtrialinanigeriantertiarycarehospital