Cargando…
Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu(®) aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU
BACKGROUND: Flexible optical bronchoscopes are essential for management of airways in ICU, but the conventional reusable flexible scopes have three major drawbacks: high cost of repairs, need for decontamination, and possible transmission of infectious agents. The main objective of this study was to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0228-3 |
_version_ | 1782490715917385728 |
---|---|
author | Perbet, S. Blanquet, M. Mourgues, C. Delmas, J. Bertran, S. Longère, B. Boïko-Alaux, V. Chennell, P. Bazin, J.-E. Constantin, J.-M. |
author_facet | Perbet, S. Blanquet, M. Mourgues, C. Delmas, J. Bertran, S. Longère, B. Boïko-Alaux, V. Chennell, P. Bazin, J.-E. Constantin, J.-M. |
author_sort | Perbet, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flexible optical bronchoscopes are essential for management of airways in ICU, but the conventional reusable flexible scopes have three major drawbacks: high cost of repairs, need for decontamination, and possible transmission of infectious agents. The main objective of this study was to measure the cost of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) using reusable bronchoscopes and single-use bronchoscopes in an ICU of an university hospital. The secondary objective was to compare the satisfaction of healthcare professionals with reusable and single-use bronchoscopes. METHODS: The study was performed between August 2009 and July 2014 in a 16-bed ICU. All BAL and PT procedures were performed by experienced healthcare professionals. Cost analysis was performed considering ICU and hospital organization. Healthcare professional satisfaction with single-use and reusable scopes was determined based on eight factors. Sensitivity analysis was performed by applying discount rates (0, 3, and 5%) and by simulation of six situations based on different assumptions. RESULTS: At a discount rate of 3%, the costs per BAL for the two reusable scopes were 188.86€ (scope 1) and 185.94€ (scope 2), and the costs per PT for the reusable scope 1 and scope 2 and single-use scopes were 1613.84€, 410.24€, and 204.49€, respectively. The cost per procedure for the reusable scopes depended on the number of procedures performed, maintenance costs, and decontamination costs. Healthcare professionals were more satisfied with the third-generation single-use Ambu(®) aScope™. CONCLUSIONS: The cost per procedure for the single-use scope was not superior to that for reusable scopes. The choice of single-use or reusable bronchoscopes in an ICU should consider the frequency of procedures and the number of bronchoscopes needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0228-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5209315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52093152017-01-18 Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu(®) aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU Perbet, S. Blanquet, M. Mourgues, C. Delmas, J. Bertran, S. Longère, B. Boïko-Alaux, V. Chennell, P. Bazin, J.-E. Constantin, J.-M. Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Flexible optical bronchoscopes are essential for management of airways in ICU, but the conventional reusable flexible scopes have three major drawbacks: high cost of repairs, need for decontamination, and possible transmission of infectious agents. The main objective of this study was to measure the cost of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) using reusable bronchoscopes and single-use bronchoscopes in an ICU of an university hospital. The secondary objective was to compare the satisfaction of healthcare professionals with reusable and single-use bronchoscopes. METHODS: The study was performed between August 2009 and July 2014 in a 16-bed ICU. All BAL and PT procedures were performed by experienced healthcare professionals. Cost analysis was performed considering ICU and hospital organization. Healthcare professional satisfaction with single-use and reusable scopes was determined based on eight factors. Sensitivity analysis was performed by applying discount rates (0, 3, and 5%) and by simulation of six situations based on different assumptions. RESULTS: At a discount rate of 3%, the costs per BAL for the two reusable scopes were 188.86€ (scope 1) and 185.94€ (scope 2), and the costs per PT for the reusable scope 1 and scope 2 and single-use scopes were 1613.84€, 410.24€, and 204.49€, respectively. The cost per procedure for the reusable scopes depended on the number of procedures performed, maintenance costs, and decontamination costs. Healthcare professionals were more satisfied with the third-generation single-use Ambu(®) aScope™. CONCLUSIONS: The cost per procedure for the single-use scope was not superior to that for reusable scopes. The choice of single-use or reusable bronchoscopes in an ICU should consider the frequency of procedures and the number of bronchoscopes needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0228-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Paris 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5209315/ /pubmed/28050896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0228-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Perbet, S. Blanquet, M. Mourgues, C. Delmas, J. Bertran, S. Longère, B. Boïko-Alaux, V. Chennell, P. Bazin, J.-E. Constantin, J.-M. Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu(®) aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU |
title | Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu(®) aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU |
title_full | Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu(®) aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU |
title_fullStr | Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu(®) aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu(®) aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU |
title_short | Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu(®) aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU |
title_sort | cost analysis of single-use (ambu(®) ascope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the icu |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0228-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perbets costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT blanquetm costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT mourguesc costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT delmasj costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT bertrans costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT longereb costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT boikoalauxv costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT chennellp costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT bazinje costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu AT constantinjm costanalysisofsingleuseambuascopeandreusablebronchoscopesintheicu |