Cargando…

Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment with EORTC QLQ-C30 was prognostic for overall survival (OS) in patients with advance-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no data existed for early-stage patients. The HCC-specific QLQ-HCC18 has not been evaluated for prognostic valu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Leung, Mo, Frankie KF, Chan, Stephen L, Hui, Edwin P, Tang, Nelson SL, Koh, Jane, Leung, Linda KS, Poon, Annette NY, Hui, Joyce, Chu, Cheuk M, Lee, Kit F, Ma, Brigette BY, Lai, Paul BS, Chan, Anthony TC, Yu, Simon CH, Yeo, Winnie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28052758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2995-5
_version_ 1782490803682148352
author Li, Leung
Mo, Frankie KF
Chan, Stephen L
Hui, Edwin P
Tang, Nelson SL
Koh, Jane
Leung, Linda KS
Poon, Annette NY
Hui, Joyce
Chu, Cheuk M
Lee, Kit F
Ma, Brigette BY
Lai, Paul BS
Chan, Anthony TC
Yu, Simon CH
Yeo, Winnie
author_facet Li, Leung
Mo, Frankie KF
Chan, Stephen L
Hui, Edwin P
Tang, Nelson SL
Koh, Jane
Leung, Linda KS
Poon, Annette NY
Hui, Joyce
Chu, Cheuk M
Lee, Kit F
Ma, Brigette BY
Lai, Paul BS
Chan, Anthony TC
Yu, Simon CH
Yeo, Winnie
author_sort Li, Leung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment with EORTC QLQ-C30 was prognostic for overall survival (OS) in patients with advance-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no data existed for early-stage patients. The HCC-specific QLQ-HCC18 has not been evaluated for prognostic value in HCC patients. Utilization of raw HRQOL data in clinical setting has been impractical and non-meaningful. Therefore we developed index scores of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 in an attempt to enable clinical utilization of these HRQOL measurements. This study investigates the prognostic significance of QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18 and C30/HCC18 index-scores in patients with newly diagnosed HCC which encompasses all stages. METHODS: From 2007–2011, 517 patients were prospectively recruited. HRQOL was assessed at diagnosis using QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18; C30 and HCC18 index-scores were calculated from raw HRQOL data. Cox regression was performed using continuous, dichotomized QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 variables, or index-scores, together with clinical factors to identify independent factors for OS. Various multivariate models were validated with c-index and bootstrapping for 1000 replications. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy two patients had complete HRQOL data. Their median OS was 8.6 months. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic HRQOL variables for OS were QLQ-C30 pain (HR 1.346 [1.092–1.661], p = 0.0055), QLQ-C30 physical functioning (HR 0.652 [0.495–0.860], p = 0.0024); QLQ-HCC18 pain (HR 1.382 [1.089–1.754], p = 0.0077) and QLQ-HCC18 fatigue (HR 1.441 [1.132–1.833], p = 0.0030). C30 index-score (HR 2.143 [1.616–2.841], p < 0.0001) and HCC18 index-score (HR 1.957 [1.411–2.715], p < 0.0001) were highly significant factors for OS. The median OS of patients with C30 index-score of 0–20, 21–40, 41–60, 61–100 were 16.4, 7.3, 3.1, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001); while for HCC18 index-score: 16.4, 6.0, 2.8, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001). All the multivariate models were validated, with mean optimism <0.01. The bootstrap validated c-index was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 were prognostic for OS in patients with newly diagnosed HCC irrespective of stage. Both C30 and HCC18 index-scores were highly significant prognostic factors for OS in newly diagnosed HCC patients. Index-scoring provides an effective way to summarize, analyze and interpret raw HRQOL data, and renders QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 meaningful and communicable in clinical practice. Index-scores could potentially serve as a standardized tool for future HRQOL research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5209840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52098402017-01-04 Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data Li, Leung Mo, Frankie KF Chan, Stephen L Hui, Edwin P Tang, Nelson SL Koh, Jane Leung, Linda KS Poon, Annette NY Hui, Joyce Chu, Cheuk M Lee, Kit F Ma, Brigette BY Lai, Paul BS Chan, Anthony TC Yu, Simon CH Yeo, Winnie BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment with EORTC QLQ-C30 was prognostic for overall survival (OS) in patients with advance-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no data existed for early-stage patients. The HCC-specific QLQ-HCC18 has not been evaluated for prognostic value in HCC patients. Utilization of raw HRQOL data in clinical setting has been impractical and non-meaningful. Therefore we developed index scores of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 in an attempt to enable clinical utilization of these HRQOL measurements. This study investigates the prognostic significance of QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18 and C30/HCC18 index-scores in patients with newly diagnosed HCC which encompasses all stages. METHODS: From 2007–2011, 517 patients were prospectively recruited. HRQOL was assessed at diagnosis using QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18; C30 and HCC18 index-scores were calculated from raw HRQOL data. Cox regression was performed using continuous, dichotomized QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 variables, or index-scores, together with clinical factors to identify independent factors for OS. Various multivariate models were validated with c-index and bootstrapping for 1000 replications. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy two patients had complete HRQOL data. Their median OS was 8.6 months. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic HRQOL variables for OS were QLQ-C30 pain (HR 1.346 [1.092–1.661], p = 0.0055), QLQ-C30 physical functioning (HR 0.652 [0.495–0.860], p = 0.0024); QLQ-HCC18 pain (HR 1.382 [1.089–1.754], p = 0.0077) and QLQ-HCC18 fatigue (HR 1.441 [1.132–1.833], p = 0.0030). C30 index-score (HR 2.143 [1.616–2.841], p < 0.0001) and HCC18 index-score (HR 1.957 [1.411–2.715], p < 0.0001) were highly significant factors for OS. The median OS of patients with C30 index-score of 0–20, 21–40, 41–60, 61–100 were 16.4, 7.3, 3.1, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001); while for HCC18 index-score: 16.4, 6.0, 2.8, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001). All the multivariate models were validated, with mean optimism <0.01. The bootstrap validated c-index was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 were prognostic for OS in patients with newly diagnosed HCC irrespective of stage. Both C30 and HCC18 index-scores were highly significant prognostic factors for OS in newly diagnosed HCC patients. Index-scoring provides an effective way to summarize, analyze and interpret raw HRQOL data, and renders QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 meaningful and communicable in clinical practice. Index-scores could potentially serve as a standardized tool for future HRQOL research. BioMed Central 2017-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5209840/ /pubmed/28052758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2995-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Leung
Mo, Frankie KF
Chan, Stephen L
Hui, Edwin P
Tang, Nelson SL
Koh, Jane
Leung, Linda KS
Poon, Annette NY
Hui, Joyce
Chu, Cheuk M
Lee, Kit F
Ma, Brigette BY
Lai, Paul BS
Chan, Anthony TC
Yu, Simon CH
Yeo, Winnie
Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data
title Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data
title_full Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data
title_fullStr Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data
title_short Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data
title_sort prognostic values of eortc qlq-c30 and qlq-hcc18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28052758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2995-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lileung prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT mofrankiekf prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT chanstephenl prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT huiedwinp prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT tangnelsonsl prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT kohjane prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT leunglindaks prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT poonannetteny prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT huijoyce prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT chucheukm prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT leekitf prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT mabrigetteby prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT laipaulbs prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT chananthonytc prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT yusimonch prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata
AT yeowinnie prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata