Cargando…
Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment with EORTC QLQ-C30 was prognostic for overall survival (OS) in patients with advance-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no data existed for early-stage patients. The HCC-specific QLQ-HCC18 has not been evaluated for prognostic valu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28052758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2995-5 |
_version_ | 1782490803682148352 |
---|---|
author | Li, Leung Mo, Frankie KF Chan, Stephen L Hui, Edwin P Tang, Nelson SL Koh, Jane Leung, Linda KS Poon, Annette NY Hui, Joyce Chu, Cheuk M Lee, Kit F Ma, Brigette BY Lai, Paul BS Chan, Anthony TC Yu, Simon CH Yeo, Winnie |
author_facet | Li, Leung Mo, Frankie KF Chan, Stephen L Hui, Edwin P Tang, Nelson SL Koh, Jane Leung, Linda KS Poon, Annette NY Hui, Joyce Chu, Cheuk M Lee, Kit F Ma, Brigette BY Lai, Paul BS Chan, Anthony TC Yu, Simon CH Yeo, Winnie |
author_sort | Li, Leung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment with EORTC QLQ-C30 was prognostic for overall survival (OS) in patients with advance-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no data existed for early-stage patients. The HCC-specific QLQ-HCC18 has not been evaluated for prognostic value in HCC patients. Utilization of raw HRQOL data in clinical setting has been impractical and non-meaningful. Therefore we developed index scores of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 in an attempt to enable clinical utilization of these HRQOL measurements. This study investigates the prognostic significance of QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18 and C30/HCC18 index-scores in patients with newly diagnosed HCC which encompasses all stages. METHODS: From 2007–2011, 517 patients were prospectively recruited. HRQOL was assessed at diagnosis using QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18; C30 and HCC18 index-scores were calculated from raw HRQOL data. Cox regression was performed using continuous, dichotomized QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 variables, or index-scores, together with clinical factors to identify independent factors for OS. Various multivariate models were validated with c-index and bootstrapping for 1000 replications. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy two patients had complete HRQOL data. Their median OS was 8.6 months. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic HRQOL variables for OS were QLQ-C30 pain (HR 1.346 [1.092–1.661], p = 0.0055), QLQ-C30 physical functioning (HR 0.652 [0.495–0.860], p = 0.0024); QLQ-HCC18 pain (HR 1.382 [1.089–1.754], p = 0.0077) and QLQ-HCC18 fatigue (HR 1.441 [1.132–1.833], p = 0.0030). C30 index-score (HR 2.143 [1.616–2.841], p < 0.0001) and HCC18 index-score (HR 1.957 [1.411–2.715], p < 0.0001) were highly significant factors for OS. The median OS of patients with C30 index-score of 0–20, 21–40, 41–60, 61–100 were 16.4, 7.3, 3.1, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001); while for HCC18 index-score: 16.4, 6.0, 2.8, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001). All the multivariate models were validated, with mean optimism <0.01. The bootstrap validated c-index was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 were prognostic for OS in patients with newly diagnosed HCC irrespective of stage. Both C30 and HCC18 index-scores were highly significant prognostic factors for OS in newly diagnosed HCC patients. Index-scoring provides an effective way to summarize, analyze and interpret raw HRQOL data, and renders QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 meaningful and communicable in clinical practice. Index-scores could potentially serve as a standardized tool for future HRQOL research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5209840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52098402017-01-04 Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data Li, Leung Mo, Frankie KF Chan, Stephen L Hui, Edwin P Tang, Nelson SL Koh, Jane Leung, Linda KS Poon, Annette NY Hui, Joyce Chu, Cheuk M Lee, Kit F Ma, Brigette BY Lai, Paul BS Chan, Anthony TC Yu, Simon CH Yeo, Winnie BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment with EORTC QLQ-C30 was prognostic for overall survival (OS) in patients with advance-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no data existed for early-stage patients. The HCC-specific QLQ-HCC18 has not been evaluated for prognostic value in HCC patients. Utilization of raw HRQOL data in clinical setting has been impractical and non-meaningful. Therefore we developed index scores of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 in an attempt to enable clinical utilization of these HRQOL measurements. This study investigates the prognostic significance of QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18 and C30/HCC18 index-scores in patients with newly diagnosed HCC which encompasses all stages. METHODS: From 2007–2011, 517 patients were prospectively recruited. HRQOL was assessed at diagnosis using QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18; C30 and HCC18 index-scores were calculated from raw HRQOL data. Cox regression was performed using continuous, dichotomized QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 variables, or index-scores, together with clinical factors to identify independent factors for OS. Various multivariate models were validated with c-index and bootstrapping for 1000 replications. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy two patients had complete HRQOL data. Their median OS was 8.6 months. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic HRQOL variables for OS were QLQ-C30 pain (HR 1.346 [1.092–1.661], p = 0.0055), QLQ-C30 physical functioning (HR 0.652 [0.495–0.860], p = 0.0024); QLQ-HCC18 pain (HR 1.382 [1.089–1.754], p = 0.0077) and QLQ-HCC18 fatigue (HR 1.441 [1.132–1.833], p = 0.0030). C30 index-score (HR 2.143 [1.616–2.841], p < 0.0001) and HCC18 index-score (HR 1.957 [1.411–2.715], p < 0.0001) were highly significant factors for OS. The median OS of patients with C30 index-score of 0–20, 21–40, 41–60, 61–100 were 16.4, 7.3, 3.1, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001); while for HCC18 index-score: 16.4, 6.0, 2.8, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001). All the multivariate models were validated, with mean optimism <0.01. The bootstrap validated c-index was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 were prognostic for OS in patients with newly diagnosed HCC irrespective of stage. Both C30 and HCC18 index-scores were highly significant prognostic factors for OS in newly diagnosed HCC patients. Index-scoring provides an effective way to summarize, analyze and interpret raw HRQOL data, and renders QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 meaningful and communicable in clinical practice. Index-scores could potentially serve as a standardized tool for future HRQOL research. BioMed Central 2017-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5209840/ /pubmed/28052758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2995-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Leung Mo, Frankie KF Chan, Stephen L Hui, Edwin P Tang, Nelson SL Koh, Jane Leung, Linda KS Poon, Annette NY Hui, Joyce Chu, Cheuk M Lee, Kit F Ma, Brigette BY Lai, Paul BS Chan, Anthony TC Yu, Simon CH Yeo, Winnie Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data |
title | Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data |
title_full | Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data |
title_fullStr | Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data |
title_short | Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data |
title_sort | prognostic values of eortc qlq-c30 and qlq-hcc18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28052758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2995-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lileung prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT mofrankiekf prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT chanstephenl prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT huiedwinp prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT tangnelsonsl prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT kohjane prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT leunglindaks prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT poonannetteny prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT huijoyce prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT chucheukm prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT leekitf prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT mabrigetteby prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT laipaulbs prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT chananthonytc prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT yusimonch prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata AT yeowinnie prognosticvaluesofeortcqlqc30andqlqhcc18indexscoresinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaclinicalapplicationofhealthrelatedqualityoflifedata |