Cargando…
The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
BACKGROUND: Recording of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is used during navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) motor mapping to locate motor function in the human brain. However, factors potentially underlying MEP latency variability in neurosurgical motor mapping are vastly unknown. In t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0321-4 |
_version_ | 1782490805893595136 |
---|---|
author | Sollmann, Nico Bulubas, Lucia Tanigawa, Noriko Zimmer, Claus Meyer, Bernhard Krieg, Sandro M. |
author_facet | Sollmann, Nico Bulubas, Lucia Tanigawa, Noriko Zimmer, Claus Meyer, Bernhard Krieg, Sandro M. |
author_sort | Sollmann, Nico |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recording of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is used during navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) motor mapping to locate motor function in the human brain. However, factors potentially underlying MEP latency variability in neurosurgical motor mapping are vastly unknown. In the context of this study, one hundred brain tumor patients underwent preoperative nTMS-based motor mapping of the tumor hemisphere between 2010 and 2013. Fourteen predefined predictor variables were recorded, and MEP latencies of abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB), abductor digiti minimi muscle (ADM), and flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR) were analyzed using linear mixed-effect multiple regression analysis with the forward step-wise model comparison approach. RESULTS: Common factors (relevant to APB, ADM, and FCR) for MEP latency variability were gender, most likely due to body height, and antiepileptic drug (AED) intake. Muscle-specific factors (relevant to APB, ADM, or FCR) for MEP latency variability were resting motor threshold (rMT), tumor side, and tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a large cohort of neurosurgical patients, this study provides data on a wide range of clinical factors that may underlie MEP latency variability. The factors that significantly contributed to MEP latency variability should be standardly recorded and taken into consideration during neurosurgical motor mapping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5209850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52098502017-01-04 The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation Sollmann, Nico Bulubas, Lucia Tanigawa, Noriko Zimmer, Claus Meyer, Bernhard Krieg, Sandro M. BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Recording of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is used during navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) motor mapping to locate motor function in the human brain. However, factors potentially underlying MEP latency variability in neurosurgical motor mapping are vastly unknown. In the context of this study, one hundred brain tumor patients underwent preoperative nTMS-based motor mapping of the tumor hemisphere between 2010 and 2013. Fourteen predefined predictor variables were recorded, and MEP latencies of abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB), abductor digiti minimi muscle (ADM), and flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR) were analyzed using linear mixed-effect multiple regression analysis with the forward step-wise model comparison approach. RESULTS: Common factors (relevant to APB, ADM, and FCR) for MEP latency variability were gender, most likely due to body height, and antiepileptic drug (AED) intake. Muscle-specific factors (relevant to APB, ADM, or FCR) for MEP latency variability were resting motor threshold (rMT), tumor side, and tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a large cohort of neurosurgical patients, this study provides data on a wide range of clinical factors that may underlie MEP latency variability. The factors that significantly contributed to MEP latency variability should be standardly recorded and taken into consideration during neurosurgical motor mapping. BioMed Central 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5209850/ /pubmed/28049425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0321-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sollmann, Nico Bulubas, Lucia Tanigawa, Noriko Zimmer, Claus Meyer, Bernhard Krieg, Sandro M. The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title | The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_full | The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_fullStr | The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_short | The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_sort | variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0321-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sollmannnico thevariabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT bulubaslucia thevariabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT tanigawanoriko thevariabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT zimmerclaus thevariabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT meyerbernhard thevariabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT kriegsandrom thevariabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT sollmannnico variabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT bulubaslucia variabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT tanigawanoriko variabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT zimmerclaus variabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT meyerbernhard variabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation AT kriegsandrom variabilityofmotorevokedpotentiallatenciesinneurosurgicalmotormappingbypreoperativenavigatedtranscranialmagneticstimulation |