Cargando…

Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial

BACKGROUND: Certain disadvantages of the standard hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilizing agent G-CSF fuel the quest for alternatives. We herein report results of a Phase I dose escalation trial comparing mobilization with a peptidic CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) vs. G-CS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karpova, Darja, Bräuninger, Susanne, Wiercinska, Eliza, Krämer, Ariane, Stock, Belinda, Graff, Jochen, Martin, Hans, Wach, Achim, Escot, Christophe, Douglas, Garry, Romagnoli, Barbara, Chevalier, Eric, Dembowski, Klaus, Hooftman, Leon, Bonig, Halvard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1107-2
_version_ 1782490812585607168
author Karpova, Darja
Bräuninger, Susanne
Wiercinska, Eliza
Krämer, Ariane
Stock, Belinda
Graff, Jochen
Martin, Hans
Wach, Achim
Escot, Christophe
Douglas, Garry
Romagnoli, Barbara
Chevalier, Eric
Dembowski, Klaus
Hooftman, Leon
Bonig, Halvard
author_facet Karpova, Darja
Bräuninger, Susanne
Wiercinska, Eliza
Krämer, Ariane
Stock, Belinda
Graff, Jochen
Martin, Hans
Wach, Achim
Escot, Christophe
Douglas, Garry
Romagnoli, Barbara
Chevalier, Eric
Dembowski, Klaus
Hooftman, Leon
Bonig, Halvard
author_sort Karpova, Darja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Certain disadvantages of the standard hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilizing agent G-CSF fuel the quest for alternatives. We herein report results of a Phase I dose escalation trial comparing mobilization with a peptidic CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) vs. G-CSF. METHODS: Healthy male volunteer donors with a documented average mobilization response to G-CSF received, following ≥6 weeks wash-out, a 1–2 h infusion of 500–2500 µg/kg of balixafortide. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Balixafortide was well tolerated and rated favorably over G-CSF by subjects. At all doses tested balixafortide mobilized HSPC. In the dose range between 1500 and 2500 µg/kg mobilization was similar, reaching 38.2 ± 2.8 CD34 + cells/µL (mean ± SEM). Balixafortide caused mixed leukocytosis in the mid-20 K/µL range. B-lymphocytosis was more pronounced, whereas neutrophilia and monocytosis were markedly less accentuated with balixafortide compared to G-CSF. At the 24 h time point, leukocytes had largely normalized. CONCLUSIONS: Balixafortide is safe, well tolerated, and induces efficient mobilization of HSPCs in healthy male volunteers. Based on experience with current apheresis technology, the observed mobilization at doses ≥1500 µg/kg of balixafortide is predicted to yield in a single apheresis a standard dose of 4× 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg from most individuals donating for an approximately weight-matched recipient. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens may provide even higher mobilization responses. Trial Registration European Medicines Agency (EudraCT-Nr. 2011-003316-23) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01841476)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5209880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52098802017-01-04 Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial Karpova, Darja Bräuninger, Susanne Wiercinska, Eliza Krämer, Ariane Stock, Belinda Graff, Jochen Martin, Hans Wach, Achim Escot, Christophe Douglas, Garry Romagnoli, Barbara Chevalier, Eric Dembowski, Klaus Hooftman, Leon Bonig, Halvard J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Certain disadvantages of the standard hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilizing agent G-CSF fuel the quest for alternatives. We herein report results of a Phase I dose escalation trial comparing mobilization with a peptidic CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) vs. G-CSF. METHODS: Healthy male volunteer donors with a documented average mobilization response to G-CSF received, following ≥6 weeks wash-out, a 1–2 h infusion of 500–2500 µg/kg of balixafortide. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Balixafortide was well tolerated and rated favorably over G-CSF by subjects. At all doses tested balixafortide mobilized HSPC. In the dose range between 1500 and 2500 µg/kg mobilization was similar, reaching 38.2 ± 2.8 CD34 + cells/µL (mean ± SEM). Balixafortide caused mixed leukocytosis in the mid-20 K/µL range. B-lymphocytosis was more pronounced, whereas neutrophilia and monocytosis were markedly less accentuated with balixafortide compared to G-CSF. At the 24 h time point, leukocytes had largely normalized. CONCLUSIONS: Balixafortide is safe, well tolerated, and induces efficient mobilization of HSPCs in healthy male volunteers. Based on experience with current apheresis technology, the observed mobilization at doses ≥1500 µg/kg of balixafortide is predicted to yield in a single apheresis a standard dose of 4× 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg from most individuals donating for an approximately weight-matched recipient. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens may provide even higher mobilization responses. Trial Registration European Medicines Agency (EudraCT-Nr. 2011-003316-23) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01841476) BioMed Central 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5209880/ /pubmed/28049490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1107-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Karpova, Darja
Bräuninger, Susanne
Wiercinska, Eliza
Krämer, Ariane
Stock, Belinda
Graff, Jochen
Martin, Hans
Wach, Achim
Escot, Christophe
Douglas, Garry
Romagnoli, Barbara
Chevalier, Eric
Dembowski, Klaus
Hooftman, Leon
Bonig, Halvard
Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial
title Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial
title_full Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial
title_fullStr Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial
title_full_unstemmed Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial
title_short Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial
title_sort mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel cxcr4 antagonist pol6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1107-2
work_keys_str_mv AT karpovadarja mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT brauningersusanne mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT wiercinskaeliza mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT kramerariane mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT stockbelinda mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT graffjochen mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT martinhans mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT wachachim mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT escotchristophe mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT douglasgarry mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT romagnolibarbara mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT chevaliereric mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT dembowskiklaus mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT hooftmanleon mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial
AT bonighalvard mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial