Cargando…
Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial
BACKGROUND: Certain disadvantages of the standard hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilizing agent G-CSF fuel the quest for alternatives. We herein report results of a Phase I dose escalation trial comparing mobilization with a peptidic CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) vs. G-CS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1107-2 |
_version_ | 1782490812585607168 |
---|---|
author | Karpova, Darja Bräuninger, Susanne Wiercinska, Eliza Krämer, Ariane Stock, Belinda Graff, Jochen Martin, Hans Wach, Achim Escot, Christophe Douglas, Garry Romagnoli, Barbara Chevalier, Eric Dembowski, Klaus Hooftman, Leon Bonig, Halvard |
author_facet | Karpova, Darja Bräuninger, Susanne Wiercinska, Eliza Krämer, Ariane Stock, Belinda Graff, Jochen Martin, Hans Wach, Achim Escot, Christophe Douglas, Garry Romagnoli, Barbara Chevalier, Eric Dembowski, Klaus Hooftman, Leon Bonig, Halvard |
author_sort | Karpova, Darja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Certain disadvantages of the standard hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilizing agent G-CSF fuel the quest for alternatives. We herein report results of a Phase I dose escalation trial comparing mobilization with a peptidic CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) vs. G-CSF. METHODS: Healthy male volunteer donors with a documented average mobilization response to G-CSF received, following ≥6 weeks wash-out, a 1–2 h infusion of 500–2500 µg/kg of balixafortide. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Balixafortide was well tolerated and rated favorably over G-CSF by subjects. At all doses tested balixafortide mobilized HSPC. In the dose range between 1500 and 2500 µg/kg mobilization was similar, reaching 38.2 ± 2.8 CD34 + cells/µL (mean ± SEM). Balixafortide caused mixed leukocytosis in the mid-20 K/µL range. B-lymphocytosis was more pronounced, whereas neutrophilia and monocytosis were markedly less accentuated with balixafortide compared to G-CSF. At the 24 h time point, leukocytes had largely normalized. CONCLUSIONS: Balixafortide is safe, well tolerated, and induces efficient mobilization of HSPCs in healthy male volunteers. Based on experience with current apheresis technology, the observed mobilization at doses ≥1500 µg/kg of balixafortide is predicted to yield in a single apheresis a standard dose of 4× 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg from most individuals donating for an approximately weight-matched recipient. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens may provide even higher mobilization responses. Trial Registration European Medicines Agency (EudraCT-Nr. 2011-003316-23) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01841476) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5209880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52098802017-01-04 Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial Karpova, Darja Bräuninger, Susanne Wiercinska, Eliza Krämer, Ariane Stock, Belinda Graff, Jochen Martin, Hans Wach, Achim Escot, Christophe Douglas, Garry Romagnoli, Barbara Chevalier, Eric Dembowski, Klaus Hooftman, Leon Bonig, Halvard J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Certain disadvantages of the standard hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilizing agent G-CSF fuel the quest for alternatives. We herein report results of a Phase I dose escalation trial comparing mobilization with a peptidic CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) vs. G-CSF. METHODS: Healthy male volunteer donors with a documented average mobilization response to G-CSF received, following ≥6 weeks wash-out, a 1–2 h infusion of 500–2500 µg/kg of balixafortide. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Balixafortide was well tolerated and rated favorably over G-CSF by subjects. At all doses tested balixafortide mobilized HSPC. In the dose range between 1500 and 2500 µg/kg mobilization was similar, reaching 38.2 ± 2.8 CD34 + cells/µL (mean ± SEM). Balixafortide caused mixed leukocytosis in the mid-20 K/µL range. B-lymphocytosis was more pronounced, whereas neutrophilia and monocytosis were markedly less accentuated with balixafortide compared to G-CSF. At the 24 h time point, leukocytes had largely normalized. CONCLUSIONS: Balixafortide is safe, well tolerated, and induces efficient mobilization of HSPCs in healthy male volunteers. Based on experience with current apheresis technology, the observed mobilization at doses ≥1500 µg/kg of balixafortide is predicted to yield in a single apheresis a standard dose of 4× 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg from most individuals donating for an approximately weight-matched recipient. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens may provide even higher mobilization responses. Trial Registration European Medicines Agency (EudraCT-Nr. 2011-003316-23) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01841476) BioMed Central 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5209880/ /pubmed/28049490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1107-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Karpova, Darja Bräuninger, Susanne Wiercinska, Eliza Krämer, Ariane Stock, Belinda Graff, Jochen Martin, Hans Wach, Achim Escot, Christophe Douglas, Garry Romagnoli, Barbara Chevalier, Eric Dembowski, Klaus Hooftman, Leon Bonig, Halvard Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial |
title | Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial |
title_full | Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial |
title_fullStr | Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial |
title_short | Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel CXCR4 antagonist POL6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial |
title_sort | mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with the novel cxcr4 antagonist pol6326 (balixafortide) in healthy volunteers—results of a dose escalation trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1107-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karpovadarja mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT brauningersusanne mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT wiercinskaeliza mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT kramerariane mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT stockbelinda mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT graffjochen mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT martinhans mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT wachachim mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT escotchristophe mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT douglasgarry mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT romagnolibarbara mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT chevaliereric mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT dembowskiklaus mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT hooftmanleon mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial AT bonighalvard mobilizationofhematopoieticstemcellswiththenovelcxcr4antagonistpol6326balixafortideinhealthyvolunteersresultsofadoseescalationtrial |