Cargando…
Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Focussed Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a bedside ultrasonography technique used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in the emergency department. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we investigated the pot...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0 |
_version_ | 1782490847687737344 |
---|---|
author | Dammers, D. El Moumni, M. Hoogland, I.I. Veeger, N. ter Avest, E. |
author_facet | Dammers, D. El Moumni, M. Hoogland, I.I. Veeger, N. ter Avest, E. |
author_sort | Dammers, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Focussed Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a bedside ultrasonography technique used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in the emergency department. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we investigated the potential of FAST as a risk stratification instrument in haemodynamically (HD) stable patients presenting after BAT by establishing the association between the FAST exam result and final outcome. An adverse outcome was defined in this context as the need for either a laparoscopy/laparotomy or an angiographic embolization or death due to abdominal injuries). RESULTS: A total of 421 patients with BAT were included, of which nine had an adverse outcome (2%). FAST was negative in 407 patients. Six of them turned out to have free intraperitoneal fluid (sensitivity 67 [41–86]%). FAST was positive in 14 patients, 12 of whom had free intraperitoneal fluid (specificity 99 [98–100]%). A positive FAST (positive likelihood ratio 34.3 [15.1–78.5]) was stronger associated with an adverse outcome than Injury Severity Score (ISS) or any individual clinical- or biochemical variables measured at presentation in the ED. DISCUSSION: The FAST exam can provide valuable prognostic information at minimal expenses during the early stages of resuscitation in haemodynamically stable patients presenting with BAT. CONCLUSIONS: FAST exam should not be omitted in patients with BAT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5210260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52102602017-01-06 Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study Dammers, D. El Moumni, M. Hoogland, I.I. Veeger, N. ter Avest, E. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Focussed Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a bedside ultrasonography technique used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in the emergency department. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we investigated the potential of FAST as a risk stratification instrument in haemodynamically (HD) stable patients presenting after BAT by establishing the association between the FAST exam result and final outcome. An adverse outcome was defined in this context as the need for either a laparoscopy/laparotomy or an angiographic embolization or death due to abdominal injuries). RESULTS: A total of 421 patients with BAT were included, of which nine had an adverse outcome (2%). FAST was negative in 407 patients. Six of them turned out to have free intraperitoneal fluid (sensitivity 67 [41–86]%). FAST was positive in 14 patients, 12 of whom had free intraperitoneal fluid (specificity 99 [98–100]%). A positive FAST (positive likelihood ratio 34.3 [15.1–78.5]) was stronger associated with an adverse outcome than Injury Severity Score (ISS) or any individual clinical- or biochemical variables measured at presentation in the ED. DISCUSSION: The FAST exam can provide valuable prognostic information at minimal expenses during the early stages of resuscitation in haemodynamically stable patients presenting with BAT. CONCLUSIONS: FAST exam should not be omitted in patients with BAT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5210260/ /pubmed/28049498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dammers, D. El Moumni, M. Hoogland, I.I. Veeger, N. ter Avest, E. Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | should we perform a fast exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dammersd shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT elmoumnim shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT hooglandii shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT veegern shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT teraveste shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy |