Cargando…

Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Focussed Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a bedside ultrasonography technique used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in the emergency department. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we investigated the pot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dammers, D., El Moumni, M., Hoogland, I.I., Veeger, N., ter Avest, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0
_version_ 1782490847687737344
author Dammers, D.
El Moumni, M.
Hoogland, I.I.
Veeger, N.
ter Avest, E.
author_facet Dammers, D.
El Moumni, M.
Hoogland, I.I.
Veeger, N.
ter Avest, E.
author_sort Dammers, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Focussed Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a bedside ultrasonography technique used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in the emergency department. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we investigated the potential of FAST as a risk stratification instrument in haemodynamically (HD) stable patients presenting after BAT by establishing the association between the FAST exam result and final outcome. An adverse outcome was defined in this context as the need for either a laparoscopy/laparotomy or an angiographic embolization or death due to abdominal injuries). RESULTS: A total of 421 patients with BAT were included, of which nine had an adverse outcome (2%). FAST was negative in 407 patients. Six of them turned out to have free intraperitoneal fluid (sensitivity 67 [41–86]%). FAST was positive in 14 patients, 12 of whom had free intraperitoneal fluid (specificity 99 [98–100]%). A positive FAST (positive likelihood ratio 34.3 [15.1–78.5]) was stronger associated with an adverse outcome than Injury Severity Score (ISS) or any individual clinical- or biochemical variables measured at presentation in the ED. DISCUSSION: The FAST exam can provide valuable prognostic information at minimal expenses during the early stages of resuscitation in haemodynamically stable patients presenting with BAT. CONCLUSIONS: FAST exam should not be omitted in patients with BAT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5210260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52102602017-01-06 Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study Dammers, D. El Moumni, M. Hoogland, I.I. Veeger, N. ter Avest, E. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Focussed Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a bedside ultrasonography technique used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in the emergency department. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we investigated the potential of FAST as a risk stratification instrument in haemodynamically (HD) stable patients presenting after BAT by establishing the association between the FAST exam result and final outcome. An adverse outcome was defined in this context as the need for either a laparoscopy/laparotomy or an angiographic embolization or death due to abdominal injuries). RESULTS: A total of 421 patients with BAT were included, of which nine had an adverse outcome (2%). FAST was negative in 407 patients. Six of them turned out to have free intraperitoneal fluid (sensitivity 67 [41–86]%). FAST was positive in 14 patients, 12 of whom had free intraperitoneal fluid (specificity 99 [98–100]%). A positive FAST (positive likelihood ratio 34.3 [15.1–78.5]) was stronger associated with an adverse outcome than Injury Severity Score (ISS) or any individual clinical- or biochemical variables measured at presentation in the ED. DISCUSSION: The FAST exam can provide valuable prognostic information at minimal expenses during the early stages of resuscitation in haemodynamically stable patients presenting with BAT. CONCLUSIONS: FAST exam should not be omitted in patients with BAT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5210260/ /pubmed/28049498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dammers, D.
El Moumni, M.
Hoogland, I.I.
Veeger, N.
ter Avest, E.
Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study
title Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Should we perform a FAST exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort should we perform a fast exam in haemodynamically stable patients presenting after blunt abdominal injury: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0342-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dammersd shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT elmoumnim shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hooglandii shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT veegern shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT teraveste shouldweperformafastexaminhaemodynamicallystablepatientspresentingafterbluntabdominalinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy