Cargando…

Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta‐Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the clinical safety of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) is limited and derived mainly from individual trials; therefore, we conducted a meta‐analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: After systematic searches of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and the ClinicalT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Anhua, Gu, Zhichun, Li, Juan, Liu, Xiaoyan, Wu, Xiaofan, Han, Yi, Pu, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27912207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003896
_version_ 1782490860809617408
author Wei, Anhua
Gu, Zhichun
Li, Juan
Liu, Xiaoyan
Wu, Xiaofan
Han, Yi
Pu, Jun
author_facet Wei, Anhua
Gu, Zhichun
Li, Juan
Liu, Xiaoyan
Wu, Xiaofan
Han, Yi
Pu, Jun
author_sort Wei, Anhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence of the clinical safety of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) is limited and derived mainly from individual trials; therefore, we conducted a meta‐analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: After systematic searches of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov website, randomized controlled trials with patients receiving ERAs (bosentan, macitentan, or ambrisentan) in at least 1 treatment group were included. All reported adverse events of ERAs were evaluated. Summary relative risks and 95% CIs were calculated using random‐ or fixed‐effects models according to between‐study heterogeneity. In total, 24 randomized trials including 4894 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis showed that the incidence of abnormal liver function (7.91% versus 2.84%; risk ratio [RR] 2.38, 95% CI 1.36–4.18), peripheral edema (14.36% versus 9.68%; RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.20–1.74), and anemia (6.23% versus 2.44%; RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.78–4.07) was significantly higher in the ERA group compared with placebo. In comparisons of individual ERAs with placebo, bosentan (RR 3.78, 95% CI 2.42–5.91) but not macitentan (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.42–3.31) significantly increased the risk of abnormal liver function, whereas ambrisentan (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.45) significantly decreased that risk. Bosentan (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06–2.03) and ambrisentan (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.40–2.91) but not macitentan (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81–1.46) significantly increased the risk of peripheral edema. Bosentan (RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.52–6.30) and macitentan (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.54–4.47) but not ambrisentan (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.20–8.48) significantly increased the risk of anemia. ERAs were not found to increase other reported adverse events compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta‐analysis showed that the main adverse effects of treatment with ERAs were hepatic transaminitis (bosentan), peripheral edema (bosentan and ambrisentan), and anemia (bosentan and macitentan).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5210319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52103192017-01-05 Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta‐Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trials Wei, Anhua Gu, Zhichun Li, Juan Liu, Xiaoyan Wu, Xiaofan Han, Yi Pu, Jun J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Evidence of the clinical safety of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) is limited and derived mainly from individual trials; therefore, we conducted a meta‐analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: After systematic searches of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov website, randomized controlled trials with patients receiving ERAs (bosentan, macitentan, or ambrisentan) in at least 1 treatment group were included. All reported adverse events of ERAs were evaluated. Summary relative risks and 95% CIs were calculated using random‐ or fixed‐effects models according to between‐study heterogeneity. In total, 24 randomized trials including 4894 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis showed that the incidence of abnormal liver function (7.91% versus 2.84%; risk ratio [RR] 2.38, 95% CI 1.36–4.18), peripheral edema (14.36% versus 9.68%; RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.20–1.74), and anemia (6.23% versus 2.44%; RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.78–4.07) was significantly higher in the ERA group compared with placebo. In comparisons of individual ERAs with placebo, bosentan (RR 3.78, 95% CI 2.42–5.91) but not macitentan (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.42–3.31) significantly increased the risk of abnormal liver function, whereas ambrisentan (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.45) significantly decreased that risk. Bosentan (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06–2.03) and ambrisentan (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.40–2.91) but not macitentan (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81–1.46) significantly increased the risk of peripheral edema. Bosentan (RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.52–6.30) and macitentan (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.54–4.47) but not ambrisentan (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.20–8.48) significantly increased the risk of anemia. ERAs were not found to increase other reported adverse events compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta‐analysis showed that the main adverse effects of treatment with ERAs were hepatic transaminitis (bosentan), peripheral edema (bosentan and ambrisentan), and anemia (bosentan and macitentan). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5210319/ /pubmed/27912207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003896 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wei, Anhua
Gu, Zhichun
Li, Juan
Liu, Xiaoyan
Wu, Xiaofan
Han, Yi
Pu, Jun
Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta‐Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trials
title Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta‐Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trials
title_full Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta‐Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta‐Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta‐Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trials
title_short Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta‐Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Clinical Trials
title_sort clinical adverse effects of endothelin receptor antagonists: insights from the meta‐analysis of 4894 patients from 24 randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27912207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003896
work_keys_str_mv AT weianhua clinicaladverseeffectsofendothelinreceptorantagonistsinsightsfromthemetaanalysisof4894patientsfrom24randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledclinicaltrials
AT guzhichun clinicaladverseeffectsofendothelinreceptorantagonistsinsightsfromthemetaanalysisof4894patientsfrom24randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledclinicaltrials
AT lijuan clinicaladverseeffectsofendothelinreceptorantagonistsinsightsfromthemetaanalysisof4894patientsfrom24randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledclinicaltrials
AT liuxiaoyan clinicaladverseeffectsofendothelinreceptorantagonistsinsightsfromthemetaanalysisof4894patientsfrom24randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledclinicaltrials
AT wuxiaofan clinicaladverseeffectsofendothelinreceptorantagonistsinsightsfromthemetaanalysisof4894patientsfrom24randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledclinicaltrials
AT hanyi clinicaladverseeffectsofendothelinreceptorantagonistsinsightsfromthemetaanalysisof4894patientsfrom24randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledclinicaltrials
AT pujun clinicaladverseeffectsofendothelinreceptorantagonistsinsightsfromthemetaanalysisof4894patientsfrom24randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledclinicaltrials