Cargando…
Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: In animal studies of the effects of hormonally active agents, measurement of anogenital distance (AGD) is now routine, and serves as a bioassay of fetal androgen action. Although measurement of AGD in humans has been discussed in the literature, to our knowledge it has been measured form...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15363098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-3-8 |
_version_ | 1782121826111979520 |
---|---|
author | Salazar-Martinez, Eduardo Romano-Riquer, Patricia Yanez-Marquez, Edith Longnecker, Matthew P Hernandez-Avila, Mauricio |
author_facet | Salazar-Martinez, Eduardo Romano-Riquer, Patricia Yanez-Marquez, Edith Longnecker, Matthew P Hernandez-Avila, Mauricio |
author_sort | Salazar-Martinez, Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In animal studies of the effects of hormonally active agents, measurement of anogenital distance (AGD) is now routine, and serves as a bioassay of fetal androgen action. Although measurement of AGD in humans has been discussed in the literature, to our knowledge it has been measured formally in only two descriptive studies of females. Because AGD has been an easy-to-measure, sensitive outcome in animals studies, we developed and implemented an anthropometric protocol for measurement of AGD in human males as well as females. METHODS: We first evaluated the reliability of the AGD measures in 20 subjects. Then measurements were taken on an additional 87 newborns (42 females, 45 males). All subjects were from Morelos, Mexico. RESULTS: The reliability (Pearson r) of the AGD measure was, for females 0.50, and for males, 0.64. The between-subject variation in AGD, however, was much greater than the variation due to measurement error. The AGD measure was about two-fold greater in males (mean, 22 mm) than in females (mean, 11 mm), and there was little overlap in the distributions for males and females. CONCLUSION: The sexual dimorphism of AGD in humans comprises prima facie evidence that this outcome may respond to in utero exposure to hormonally active agents. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-521084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5210842004-10-03 Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study Salazar-Martinez, Eduardo Romano-Riquer, Patricia Yanez-Marquez, Edith Longnecker, Matthew P Hernandez-Avila, Mauricio Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: In animal studies of the effects of hormonally active agents, measurement of anogenital distance (AGD) is now routine, and serves as a bioassay of fetal androgen action. Although measurement of AGD in humans has been discussed in the literature, to our knowledge it has been measured formally in only two descriptive studies of females. Because AGD has been an easy-to-measure, sensitive outcome in animals studies, we developed and implemented an anthropometric protocol for measurement of AGD in human males as well as females. METHODS: We first evaluated the reliability of the AGD measures in 20 subjects. Then measurements were taken on an additional 87 newborns (42 females, 45 males). All subjects were from Morelos, Mexico. RESULTS: The reliability (Pearson r) of the AGD measure was, for females 0.50, and for males, 0.64. The between-subject variation in AGD, however, was much greater than the variation due to measurement error. The AGD measure was about two-fold greater in males (mean, 22 mm) than in females (mean, 11 mm), and there was little overlap in the distributions for males and females. CONCLUSION: The sexual dimorphism of AGD in humans comprises prima facie evidence that this outcome may respond to in utero exposure to hormonally active agents. BioMed Central 2004-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC521084/ /pubmed/15363098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-3-8 Text en Copyright © 2004 Salazar-Martinez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Salazar-Martinez, Eduardo Romano-Riquer, Patricia Yanez-Marquez, Edith Longnecker, Matthew P Hernandez-Avila, Mauricio Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study |
title | Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study |
title_full | Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study |
title_short | Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study |
title_sort | anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15363098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-3-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salazarmartinezeduardo anogenitaldistanceinhumanmaleandfemalenewbornsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy AT romanoriquerpatricia anogenitaldistanceinhumanmaleandfemalenewbornsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy AT yanezmarquezedith anogenitaldistanceinhumanmaleandfemalenewbornsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy AT longneckermatthewp anogenitaldistanceinhumanmaleandfemalenewbornsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy AT hernandezavilamauricio anogenitaldistanceinhumanmaleandfemalenewbornsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy |