Cargando…

Community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish

While most studies have focused on the timing and nature of ontogenetic niche shifts, information is scarce about the effects of community structure on trophic ontogeny of top predators. We investigated how community structure affects ontogenetic niche shifts (i.e., relationships between body length...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez‐Hernández, Javier, Eloranta, Antti P., Finstad, Anders G., Amundsen, Per‐Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2600
_version_ 1782491553684520960
author Sánchez‐Hernández, Javier
Eloranta, Antti P.
Finstad, Anders G.
Amundsen, Per‐Arne
author_facet Sánchez‐Hernández, Javier
Eloranta, Antti P.
Finstad, Anders G.
Amundsen, Per‐Arne
author_sort Sánchez‐Hernández, Javier
collection PubMed
description While most studies have focused on the timing and nature of ontogenetic niche shifts, information is scarce about the effects of community structure on trophic ontogeny of top predators. We investigated how community structure affects ontogenetic niche shifts (i.e., relationships between body length, trophic position, and individual dietary specialization) of a predatory fish, brown trout (Salmo trutta). We used stable isotope and stomach content analyses to test how functional characteristics of lake fish community compositions (competition and prey availability) modulate niche shifts in terms of (i) piscivorous behavior, (ii) trophic position, and (iii) individual dietary specialization. Northern Scandinavian freshwater fish communities were used as a study system, including nine subarctic lakes with contrasting fish community configurations: (i) trout‐only systems, (ii) two‐species systems (brown trout and Arctic charr [Salvelinus alpinus] coexisting), and (iii) three‐species systems (brown trout, Arctic charr, and three‐spined sticklebacks [Gasterosteus aculeatus] coexisting). We expected that the presence of profitable small prey (stickleback) and mixed competitor–prey fish species (charr) supports early piscivory and high individual dietary specialization among trout in multispecies communities, whereas minor ontogenetic shifts were expected in trout‐only systems. From logistic regression models, the presence of a suitable prey fish species (stickleback) emerged as the principal variable determining the size at ontogenetic niche shifts. Generalized additive mixed models indicated that fish community structure shaped ontogenetic niche shifts in trout, with the strongest positive relationships between body length, trophic position, and individual dietary specialization being observed in three‐species communities. Our findings revealed that the presence of a small‐sized prey fish species (stickleback) rather than a mixed competitor–prey fish species (charr) was an important factor affecting the ontogenetic niche‐shift processes of trout. The study demonstrates that community structure may modulate the ontogenetic diet trajectories of and individual niche specialization within a top predator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5214065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52140652017-01-09 Community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish Sánchez‐Hernández, Javier Eloranta, Antti P. Finstad, Anders G. Amundsen, Per‐Arne Ecol Evol Original Research While most studies have focused on the timing and nature of ontogenetic niche shifts, information is scarce about the effects of community structure on trophic ontogeny of top predators. We investigated how community structure affects ontogenetic niche shifts (i.e., relationships between body length, trophic position, and individual dietary specialization) of a predatory fish, brown trout (Salmo trutta). We used stable isotope and stomach content analyses to test how functional characteristics of lake fish community compositions (competition and prey availability) modulate niche shifts in terms of (i) piscivorous behavior, (ii) trophic position, and (iii) individual dietary specialization. Northern Scandinavian freshwater fish communities were used as a study system, including nine subarctic lakes with contrasting fish community configurations: (i) trout‐only systems, (ii) two‐species systems (brown trout and Arctic charr [Salvelinus alpinus] coexisting), and (iii) three‐species systems (brown trout, Arctic charr, and three‐spined sticklebacks [Gasterosteus aculeatus] coexisting). We expected that the presence of profitable small prey (stickleback) and mixed competitor–prey fish species (charr) supports early piscivory and high individual dietary specialization among trout in multispecies communities, whereas minor ontogenetic shifts were expected in trout‐only systems. From logistic regression models, the presence of a suitable prey fish species (stickleback) emerged as the principal variable determining the size at ontogenetic niche shifts. Generalized additive mixed models indicated that fish community structure shaped ontogenetic niche shifts in trout, with the strongest positive relationships between body length, trophic position, and individual dietary specialization being observed in three‐species communities. Our findings revealed that the presence of a small‐sized prey fish species (stickleback) rather than a mixed competitor–prey fish species (charr) was an important factor affecting the ontogenetic niche‐shift processes of trout. The study demonstrates that community structure may modulate the ontogenetic diet trajectories of and individual niche specialization within a top predator. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5214065/ /pubmed/28070298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2600 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sánchez‐Hernández, Javier
Eloranta, Antti P.
Finstad, Anders G.
Amundsen, Per‐Arne
Community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish
title Community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish
title_full Community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish
title_fullStr Community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish
title_full_unstemmed Community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish
title_short Community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish
title_sort community structure affects trophic ontogeny in a predatory fish
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2600
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezhernandezjavier communitystructureaffectstrophicontogenyinapredatoryfish
AT elorantaanttip communitystructureaffectstrophicontogenyinapredatoryfish
AT finstadandersg communitystructureaffectstrophicontogenyinapredatoryfish
AT amundsenperarne communitystructureaffectstrophicontogenyinapredatoryfish