Cargando…

Assessing Energy Level as a Marker of Aerobic Exercise Readiness: A Pilot Investigation

Energy ratings have been used as a marker of exercise readiness (i.e. pre-exercise physical/mental state indicating ability to perform) within flexible nonlinear periodization (FNLP)-based resistance training interventions. However, empirical data is lacking regarding the utility of this approach fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: STROHACKER, KELLEY, BOYER, WILLIAM R., SMITHERMAN, KAYLA N., CORNELIUS, EMILY, FAZZINO, DANIEL
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28479948
_version_ 1782491598952595456
author STROHACKER, KELLEY
BOYER, WILLIAM R.
SMITHERMAN, KAYLA N.
CORNELIUS, EMILY
FAZZINO, DANIEL
author_facet STROHACKER, KELLEY
BOYER, WILLIAM R.
SMITHERMAN, KAYLA N.
CORNELIUS, EMILY
FAZZINO, DANIEL
author_sort STROHACKER, KELLEY
collection PubMed
description Energy ratings have been used as a marker of exercise readiness (i.e. pre-exercise physical/mental state indicating ability to perform) within flexible nonlinear periodization (FNLP)-based resistance training interventions. However, empirical data is lacking regarding the utility of this approach for aerobic exercise. The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of pre-exercise energy level to predict affective and behavioral responses to prescribed aerobic exercise. Participants consisted of 19 women and 8 men (N=27, age=20±4 years, estimated maximal oxygen uptake=37±6). Participants performed two 30-min bouts of treadmill exercise under an imposed moderate intensity (70–75% of age-predicted maximal heart rate; %HRmax) condition and a self-selected intensity condition. Pre-exercise energy level was assessed using the Energy Index (EI) score derived from the Profile of Mood States. Feeling Scale (FS) was the dependent variable in the imposed bout and average intensity (%HRmax) was the dependent variable during the self-selected bout. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine if EI predicted mean FS and %HRmax. After controlling for potential confounders, EI significantly predicted mean FS (β=.499, p=.037) during imposed exercise. No significant relationship existed between EI and overall intensity (β =−121, p=.554) during self-selected exercise. While EI predicted in-task core affect it was unrelated to self-selected intensity. It is premature to suggest EI as an optimal predictor of exercise readiness in regards to aerobic exercise for aerobically untrained young adults. More research is needed to determine an evidence-based marker of readiness that can be used for aerobic exercise prescribed within the context of FNLP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5214334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52143342017-05-04 Assessing Energy Level as a Marker of Aerobic Exercise Readiness: A Pilot Investigation STROHACKER, KELLEY BOYER, WILLIAM R. SMITHERMAN, KAYLA N. CORNELIUS, EMILY FAZZINO, DANIEL Int J Exerc Sci Original Research Energy ratings have been used as a marker of exercise readiness (i.e. pre-exercise physical/mental state indicating ability to perform) within flexible nonlinear periodization (FNLP)-based resistance training interventions. However, empirical data is lacking regarding the utility of this approach for aerobic exercise. The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of pre-exercise energy level to predict affective and behavioral responses to prescribed aerobic exercise. Participants consisted of 19 women and 8 men (N=27, age=20±4 years, estimated maximal oxygen uptake=37±6). Participants performed two 30-min bouts of treadmill exercise under an imposed moderate intensity (70–75% of age-predicted maximal heart rate; %HRmax) condition and a self-selected intensity condition. Pre-exercise energy level was assessed using the Energy Index (EI) score derived from the Profile of Mood States. Feeling Scale (FS) was the dependent variable in the imposed bout and average intensity (%HRmax) was the dependent variable during the self-selected bout. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine if EI predicted mean FS and %HRmax. After controlling for potential confounders, EI significantly predicted mean FS (β=.499, p=.037) during imposed exercise. No significant relationship existed between EI and overall intensity (β =−121, p=.554) during self-selected exercise. While EI predicted in-task core affect it was unrelated to self-selected intensity. It is premature to suggest EI as an optimal predictor of exercise readiness in regards to aerobic exercise for aerobically untrained young adults. More research is needed to determine an evidence-based marker of readiness that can be used for aerobic exercise prescribed within the context of FNLP. Berkeley Electronic Press 2017-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5214334/ /pubmed/28479948 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
STROHACKER, KELLEY
BOYER, WILLIAM R.
SMITHERMAN, KAYLA N.
CORNELIUS, EMILY
FAZZINO, DANIEL
Assessing Energy Level as a Marker of Aerobic Exercise Readiness: A Pilot Investigation
title Assessing Energy Level as a Marker of Aerobic Exercise Readiness: A Pilot Investigation
title_full Assessing Energy Level as a Marker of Aerobic Exercise Readiness: A Pilot Investigation
title_fullStr Assessing Energy Level as a Marker of Aerobic Exercise Readiness: A Pilot Investigation
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Energy Level as a Marker of Aerobic Exercise Readiness: A Pilot Investigation
title_short Assessing Energy Level as a Marker of Aerobic Exercise Readiness: A Pilot Investigation
title_sort assessing energy level as a marker of aerobic exercise readiness: a pilot investigation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28479948
work_keys_str_mv AT strohackerkelley assessingenergylevelasamarkerofaerobicexercisereadinessapilotinvestigation
AT boyerwilliamr assessingenergylevelasamarkerofaerobicexercisereadinessapilotinvestigation
AT smithermankaylan assessingenergylevelasamarkerofaerobicexercisereadinessapilotinvestigation
AT corneliusemily assessingenergylevelasamarkerofaerobicexercisereadinessapilotinvestigation
AT fazzinodaniel assessingenergylevelasamarkerofaerobicexercisereadinessapilotinvestigation