Cargando…
Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance
BACKGROUND: The development of resistance is a problem shared by both classical chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Patients may respond well at first, but relapse is inevitable for many cancer patients, despite many improvements in drugs and their use over the last 40 years. REVIEW: Resistance to an...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2999-1 |
_version_ | 1782491664942628864 |
---|---|
author | Cree, Ian A. Charlton, Peter |
author_facet | Cree, Ian A. Charlton, Peter |
author_sort | Cree, Ian A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The development of resistance is a problem shared by both classical chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Patients may respond well at first, but relapse is inevitable for many cancer patients, despite many improvements in drugs and their use over the last 40 years. REVIEW: Resistance to anti-cancer drugs can be acquired by several mechanisms within neoplastic cells, defined as (1) alteration of drug targets, (2) expression of drug pumps, (3) expression of detoxification mechanisms, (4) reduced susceptibility to apoptosis, (5) increased ability to repair DNA damage, and (6) altered proliferation. It is clear, however, that changes in stroma and tumour microenvironment, and local immunity can also contribute to the development of resistance. Cancer cells can and do use several of these mechanisms at one time, and there is considerable heterogeneity between tumours, necessitating an individualised approach to cancer treatment. As tumours are heterogeneous, positive selection of a drug-resistant population could help drive resistance, although acquired resistance cannot simply be viewed as overgrowth of a resistant cancer cell population. The development of such resistance mechanisms can be predicted from pre-existing genomic and proteomic profiles, and there are increasingly sophisticated methods to measure and then tackle these mechanisms in patients. CONCLUSION: The oncologist is now required to be at least one step ahead of the cancer, a process that can be likened to ‘molecular chess’. Thus, as well as an increasing role for predictive biomarkers to clinically stratify patients, it is becoming clear that personalised strategies are required to obtain best results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5214767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52147672017-01-09 Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance Cree, Ian A. Charlton, Peter BMC Cancer Review BACKGROUND: The development of resistance is a problem shared by both classical chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Patients may respond well at first, but relapse is inevitable for many cancer patients, despite many improvements in drugs and their use over the last 40 years. REVIEW: Resistance to anti-cancer drugs can be acquired by several mechanisms within neoplastic cells, defined as (1) alteration of drug targets, (2) expression of drug pumps, (3) expression of detoxification mechanisms, (4) reduced susceptibility to apoptosis, (5) increased ability to repair DNA damage, and (6) altered proliferation. It is clear, however, that changes in stroma and tumour microenvironment, and local immunity can also contribute to the development of resistance. Cancer cells can and do use several of these mechanisms at one time, and there is considerable heterogeneity between tumours, necessitating an individualised approach to cancer treatment. As tumours are heterogeneous, positive selection of a drug-resistant population could help drive resistance, although acquired resistance cannot simply be viewed as overgrowth of a resistant cancer cell population. The development of such resistance mechanisms can be predicted from pre-existing genomic and proteomic profiles, and there are increasingly sophisticated methods to measure and then tackle these mechanisms in patients. CONCLUSION: The oncologist is now required to be at least one step ahead of the cancer, a process that can be likened to ‘molecular chess’. Thus, as well as an increasing role for predictive biomarkers to clinically stratify patients, it is becoming clear that personalised strategies are required to obtain best results. BioMed Central 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5214767/ /pubmed/28056859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2999-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Cree, Ian A. Charlton, Peter Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance |
title | Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance |
title_full | Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance |
title_fullStr | Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance |
title_short | Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance |
title_sort | molecular chess? hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2999-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT creeiana molecularchesshallmarksofanticancerdrugresistance AT charltonpeter molecularchesshallmarksofanticancerdrugresistance |