Cargando…

Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: An immediate loss of strength follows virtually all types of muscle injury but there is debate whether the initial strength loss is maximal or if a secondary loss of strength occurs during the first 3 days post-injury. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to conduct a systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warren, Gordon L., Call, Jarrod A., Farthing, Amy K., Baadom-Piaro, Bemene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27100114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0528-7
_version_ 1782491671475257344
author Warren, Gordon L.
Call, Jarrod A.
Farthing, Amy K.
Baadom-Piaro, Bemene
author_facet Warren, Gordon L.
Call, Jarrod A.
Farthing, Amy K.
Baadom-Piaro, Bemene
author_sort Warren, Gordon L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An immediate loss of strength follows virtually all types of muscle injury but there is debate whether the initial strength loss is maximal or if a secondary loss of strength occurs during the first 3 days post-injury. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the research literature to determine if a secondary loss of strength occurs after an injurious initiating event. METHODS: Literature searches were performed using eight electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, Cochrane Library). Search terms included skeletal muscle AND (injur* OR damage*) AND (strength OR force OR torque). The extracted strength data were converted to a standard format by calculating the standardized mean difference, which is reported as the effect size (ES) along with its 95 % confidence interval (CI). The calculation of ES was designed so that a negative ES that was statistically less than zero would be interpreted as indicating a secondary loss of strength. RESULTS: A total of 223 studies with over 4000 human and animal subjects yielded data on 262 independent groups and a total of 936 separate ESs. Our overall meta-analysis yielded a small-to-medium, positive overall ES that was statistically greater than zero (overall ES = +0.34, 95 % CI 0.27–0.40; P < 0.00000001). Considerable variation in ES was observed among studies (I (2) = 86 %), which could be partially explained by the research group conducting the study, sex of the subject, day of post-injury strength assessment, whether fatigue was present immediately post-injury, and the muscle group injured. From the subgroup meta-analyses probing these variables, 36 subgroup ESs were calculated and none were statistically less than zero. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings do not support the presence of a secondary loss of strength following an acute muscle injury, and strongly suggest that strength, on average, recovers steadily over the first 3 days post-injury. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0528-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5214801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52148012017-01-24 Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Warren, Gordon L. Call, Jarrod A. Farthing, Amy K. Baadom-Piaro, Bemene Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: An immediate loss of strength follows virtually all types of muscle injury but there is debate whether the initial strength loss is maximal or if a secondary loss of strength occurs during the first 3 days post-injury. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the research literature to determine if a secondary loss of strength occurs after an injurious initiating event. METHODS: Literature searches were performed using eight electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, Cochrane Library). Search terms included skeletal muscle AND (injur* OR damage*) AND (strength OR force OR torque). The extracted strength data were converted to a standard format by calculating the standardized mean difference, which is reported as the effect size (ES) along with its 95 % confidence interval (CI). The calculation of ES was designed so that a negative ES that was statistically less than zero would be interpreted as indicating a secondary loss of strength. RESULTS: A total of 223 studies with over 4000 human and animal subjects yielded data on 262 independent groups and a total of 936 separate ESs. Our overall meta-analysis yielded a small-to-medium, positive overall ES that was statistically greater than zero (overall ES = +0.34, 95 % CI 0.27–0.40; P < 0.00000001). Considerable variation in ES was observed among studies (I (2) = 86 %), which could be partially explained by the research group conducting the study, sex of the subject, day of post-injury strength assessment, whether fatigue was present immediately post-injury, and the muscle group injured. From the subgroup meta-analyses probing these variables, 36 subgroup ESs were calculated and none were statistically less than zero. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings do not support the presence of a secondary loss of strength following an acute muscle injury, and strongly suggest that strength, on average, recovers steadily over the first 3 days post-injury. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0528-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-04-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5214801/ /pubmed/27100114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0528-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Warren, Gordon L.
Call, Jarrod A.
Farthing, Amy K.
Baadom-Piaro, Bemene
Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Minimal Evidence for a Secondary Loss of Strength After an Acute Muscle Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort minimal evidence for a secondary loss of strength after an acute muscle injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27100114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0528-7
work_keys_str_mv AT warrengordonl minimalevidenceforasecondarylossofstrengthafteranacutemuscleinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT calljarroda minimalevidenceforasecondarylossofstrengthafteranacutemuscleinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT farthingamyk minimalevidenceforasecondarylossofstrengthafteranacutemuscleinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baadompiarobemene minimalevidenceforasecondarylossofstrengthafteranacutemuscleinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis