Cargando…

Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET

PURPOSE: All clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET studies are currently performed with the chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). This chelator provides hexadentate coordination to zirconium, leaving two coordination sites available for coordination with, e.g., water molecules, which are relatively labile ligands. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vugts, Danielle J., Klaver, Chris, Sewing, Claudia, Poot, Alex J., Adamzek, Kevin, Huegli, Seraina, Mari, Cristina, Visser, Gerard W. M., Valverde, Ibai E., Gasser, Gilles, Mindt, Thomas L., van Dongen, Guus A. M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x
_version_ 1782491715212410880
author Vugts, Danielle J.
Klaver, Chris
Sewing, Claudia
Poot, Alex J.
Adamzek, Kevin
Huegli, Seraina
Mari, Cristina
Visser, Gerard W. M.
Valverde, Ibai E.
Gasser, Gilles
Mindt, Thomas L.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S.
author_facet Vugts, Danielle J.
Klaver, Chris
Sewing, Claudia
Poot, Alex J.
Adamzek, Kevin
Huegli, Seraina
Mari, Cristina
Visser, Gerard W. M.
Valverde, Ibai E.
Gasser, Gilles
Mindt, Thomas L.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S.
author_sort Vugts, Danielle J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: All clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET studies are currently performed with the chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). This chelator provides hexadentate coordination to zirconium, leaving two coordination sites available for coordination with, e.g., water molecules, which are relatively labile ligands. The unsaturated coordination of DFO to zirconium has been suggested to result in impaired stability of the complex in vivo and consequently in unwanted bone uptake of (89)Zr. Aiming at clinical improvements, we report here on a bifunctional isothiocyanate variant of the octadentate chelator DFO* and the in vitro and in vivo comparison of its (89)Zr-DFO*-mAb complex with (89)Zr-DFO-mAb. METHODS: The bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS was prepared from previously reported DFO* and p-phenylenediisothiocyanate. Subsequently, trastuzumab was conjugated with either DFO*-pPhe-NCS or commercial DFO-pPhe-NCS and radiolabeled with Zr-89 according to published procedures. In vitro stability experiments were carried out in saline, a histidine/sucrose buffer, and blood serum. The in vivo performance of the chelators was compared in N87 tumor-bearing mice by biodistribution studies and PET imaging. RESULTS: In 0.9 % NaCl (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab was more stable than (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab; after 72 h incubation at 2-8 °C 95 % and 58 % intact tracer were left, respectively, while in a histidine-sucrose buffer no difference was observed, both products were ≥ 92 % intact. In vivo uptake at 144 h post injection (p.i.) in tumors, blood, and most normal organs was similar for both conjugates, except for skin, liver, spleen, ileum, and bone. Tumor uptake was 32.59 ± 11.95 and 29.06 ± 8.66 % ID/g for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, respectively. The bone uptake was significantly lower for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab compared to (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. At 144 h p.i. for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, the uptake in sternum was 0.92 ± 0.16 and 3.33 ± 0.32 % ID/g, in femur 0.78 ± 0.11 and 3.85, ± 0.80 and in knee 1.38 ± 0.23 and 8.20 ± 2.94 % ID/g, respectively. The uptake in bone decreased from 24 h to 144 h p.i. about two fold for the DFO* conjugate, while it increased about two fold for the DFO conjugate. CONCLUSIONS: Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab showed superior in vitro stability and in vivo performance when compared to (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. This makes the new octadentate DFO* chelator a candidate successor of DFO for future clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5215071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52150712017-01-24 Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET Vugts, Danielle J. Klaver, Chris Sewing, Claudia Poot, Alex J. Adamzek, Kevin Huegli, Seraina Mari, Cristina Visser, Gerard W. M. Valverde, Ibai E. Gasser, Gilles Mindt, Thomas L. van Dongen, Guus A. M. S. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: All clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET studies are currently performed with the chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). This chelator provides hexadentate coordination to zirconium, leaving two coordination sites available for coordination with, e.g., water molecules, which are relatively labile ligands. The unsaturated coordination of DFO to zirconium has been suggested to result in impaired stability of the complex in vivo and consequently in unwanted bone uptake of (89)Zr. Aiming at clinical improvements, we report here on a bifunctional isothiocyanate variant of the octadentate chelator DFO* and the in vitro and in vivo comparison of its (89)Zr-DFO*-mAb complex with (89)Zr-DFO-mAb. METHODS: The bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS was prepared from previously reported DFO* and p-phenylenediisothiocyanate. Subsequently, trastuzumab was conjugated with either DFO*-pPhe-NCS or commercial DFO-pPhe-NCS and radiolabeled with Zr-89 according to published procedures. In vitro stability experiments were carried out in saline, a histidine/sucrose buffer, and blood serum. The in vivo performance of the chelators was compared in N87 tumor-bearing mice by biodistribution studies and PET imaging. RESULTS: In 0.9 % NaCl (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab was more stable than (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab; after 72 h incubation at 2-8 °C 95 % and 58 % intact tracer were left, respectively, while in a histidine-sucrose buffer no difference was observed, both products were ≥ 92 % intact. In vivo uptake at 144 h post injection (p.i.) in tumors, blood, and most normal organs was similar for both conjugates, except for skin, liver, spleen, ileum, and bone. Tumor uptake was 32.59 ± 11.95 and 29.06 ± 8.66 % ID/g for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, respectively. The bone uptake was significantly lower for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab compared to (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. At 144 h p.i. for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, the uptake in sternum was 0.92 ± 0.16 and 3.33 ± 0.32 % ID/g, in femur 0.78 ± 0.11 and 3.85, ± 0.80 and in knee 1.38 ± 0.23 and 8.20 ± 2.94 % ID/g, respectively. The uptake in bone decreased from 24 h to 144 h p.i. about two fold for the DFO* conjugate, while it increased about two fold for the DFO conjugate. CONCLUSIONS: Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab showed superior in vitro stability and in vivo performance when compared to (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. This makes the new octadentate DFO* chelator a candidate successor of DFO for future clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-08-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5215071/ /pubmed/27573793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vugts, Danielle J.
Klaver, Chris
Sewing, Claudia
Poot, Alex J.
Adamzek, Kevin
Huegli, Seraina
Mari, Cristina
Visser, Gerard W. M.
Valverde, Ibai E.
Gasser, Gilles
Mindt, Thomas L.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S.
Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_full Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_fullStr Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_short Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_sort comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator dfo*-pphe-ncs and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator dfo-pphe-ncs for (89)zr-immuno-pet
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vugtsdaniellej comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT klaverchris comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT sewingclaudia comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT pootalexj comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT adamzekkevin comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT huegliseraina comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT maricristina comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT vissergerardwm comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT valverdeibaie comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT gassergilles comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT mindtthomasl comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet
AT vandongenguusams comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet