Cargando…
Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET
PURPOSE: All clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET studies are currently performed with the chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). This chelator provides hexadentate coordination to zirconium, leaving two coordination sites available for coordination with, e.g., water molecules, which are relatively labile ligands. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x |
_version_ | 1782491715212410880 |
---|---|
author | Vugts, Danielle J. Klaver, Chris Sewing, Claudia Poot, Alex J. Adamzek, Kevin Huegli, Seraina Mari, Cristina Visser, Gerard W. M. Valverde, Ibai E. Gasser, Gilles Mindt, Thomas L. van Dongen, Guus A. M. S. |
author_facet | Vugts, Danielle J. Klaver, Chris Sewing, Claudia Poot, Alex J. Adamzek, Kevin Huegli, Seraina Mari, Cristina Visser, Gerard W. M. Valverde, Ibai E. Gasser, Gilles Mindt, Thomas L. van Dongen, Guus A. M. S. |
author_sort | Vugts, Danielle J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: All clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET studies are currently performed with the chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). This chelator provides hexadentate coordination to zirconium, leaving two coordination sites available for coordination with, e.g., water molecules, which are relatively labile ligands. The unsaturated coordination of DFO to zirconium has been suggested to result in impaired stability of the complex in vivo and consequently in unwanted bone uptake of (89)Zr. Aiming at clinical improvements, we report here on a bifunctional isothiocyanate variant of the octadentate chelator DFO* and the in vitro and in vivo comparison of its (89)Zr-DFO*-mAb complex with (89)Zr-DFO-mAb. METHODS: The bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS was prepared from previously reported DFO* and p-phenylenediisothiocyanate. Subsequently, trastuzumab was conjugated with either DFO*-pPhe-NCS or commercial DFO-pPhe-NCS and radiolabeled with Zr-89 according to published procedures. In vitro stability experiments were carried out in saline, a histidine/sucrose buffer, and blood serum. The in vivo performance of the chelators was compared in N87 tumor-bearing mice by biodistribution studies and PET imaging. RESULTS: In 0.9 % NaCl (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab was more stable than (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab; after 72 h incubation at 2-8 °C 95 % and 58 % intact tracer were left, respectively, while in a histidine-sucrose buffer no difference was observed, both products were ≥ 92 % intact. In vivo uptake at 144 h post injection (p.i.) in tumors, blood, and most normal organs was similar for both conjugates, except for skin, liver, spleen, ileum, and bone. Tumor uptake was 32.59 ± 11.95 and 29.06 ± 8.66 % ID/g for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, respectively. The bone uptake was significantly lower for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab compared to (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. At 144 h p.i. for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, the uptake in sternum was 0.92 ± 0.16 and 3.33 ± 0.32 % ID/g, in femur 0.78 ± 0.11 and 3.85, ± 0.80 and in knee 1.38 ± 0.23 and 8.20 ± 2.94 % ID/g, respectively. The uptake in bone decreased from 24 h to 144 h p.i. about two fold for the DFO* conjugate, while it increased about two fold for the DFO conjugate. CONCLUSIONS: Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab showed superior in vitro stability and in vivo performance when compared to (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. This makes the new octadentate DFO* chelator a candidate successor of DFO for future clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5215071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52150712017-01-24 Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET Vugts, Danielle J. Klaver, Chris Sewing, Claudia Poot, Alex J. Adamzek, Kevin Huegli, Seraina Mari, Cristina Visser, Gerard W. M. Valverde, Ibai E. Gasser, Gilles Mindt, Thomas L. van Dongen, Guus A. M. S. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: All clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET studies are currently performed with the chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). This chelator provides hexadentate coordination to zirconium, leaving two coordination sites available for coordination with, e.g., water molecules, which are relatively labile ligands. The unsaturated coordination of DFO to zirconium has been suggested to result in impaired stability of the complex in vivo and consequently in unwanted bone uptake of (89)Zr. Aiming at clinical improvements, we report here on a bifunctional isothiocyanate variant of the octadentate chelator DFO* and the in vitro and in vivo comparison of its (89)Zr-DFO*-mAb complex with (89)Zr-DFO-mAb. METHODS: The bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS was prepared from previously reported DFO* and p-phenylenediisothiocyanate. Subsequently, trastuzumab was conjugated with either DFO*-pPhe-NCS or commercial DFO-pPhe-NCS and radiolabeled with Zr-89 according to published procedures. In vitro stability experiments were carried out in saline, a histidine/sucrose buffer, and blood serum. The in vivo performance of the chelators was compared in N87 tumor-bearing mice by biodistribution studies and PET imaging. RESULTS: In 0.9 % NaCl (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab was more stable than (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab; after 72 h incubation at 2-8 °C 95 % and 58 % intact tracer were left, respectively, while in a histidine-sucrose buffer no difference was observed, both products were ≥ 92 % intact. In vivo uptake at 144 h post injection (p.i.) in tumors, blood, and most normal organs was similar for both conjugates, except for skin, liver, spleen, ileum, and bone. Tumor uptake was 32.59 ± 11.95 and 29.06 ± 8.66 % ID/g for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, respectively. The bone uptake was significantly lower for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab compared to (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. At 144 h p.i. for (89)Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab and (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab, the uptake in sternum was 0.92 ± 0.16 and 3.33 ± 0.32 % ID/g, in femur 0.78 ± 0.11 and 3.85, ± 0.80 and in knee 1.38 ± 0.23 and 8.20 ± 2.94 % ID/g, respectively. The uptake in bone decreased from 24 h to 144 h p.i. about two fold for the DFO* conjugate, while it increased about two fold for the DFO conjugate. CONCLUSIONS: Zr-DFO*-trastuzumab showed superior in vitro stability and in vivo performance when compared to (89)Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. This makes the new octadentate DFO* chelator a candidate successor of DFO for future clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-08-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5215071/ /pubmed/27573793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vugts, Danielle J. Klaver, Chris Sewing, Claudia Poot, Alex J. Adamzek, Kevin Huegli, Seraina Mari, Cristina Visser, Gerard W. M. Valverde, Ibai E. Gasser, Gilles Mindt, Thomas L. van Dongen, Guus A. M. S. Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET |
title | Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET |
title_full | Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET |
title_short | Comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator DFO*-pPhe-NCS and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator DFO-pPhe-NCS for (89)Zr-immuno-PET |
title_sort | comparison of the octadentate bifunctional chelator dfo*-pphe-ncs and the clinically used hexadentate bifunctional chelator dfo-pphe-ncs for (89)zr-immuno-pet |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27573793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3499-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vugtsdaniellej comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT klaverchris comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT sewingclaudia comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT pootalexj comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT adamzekkevin comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT huegliseraina comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT maricristina comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT vissergerardwm comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT valverdeibaie comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT gassergilles comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT mindtthomasl comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet AT vandongenguusams comparisonoftheoctadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsandtheclinicallyusedhexadentatebifunctionalchelatordfopphencsfor89zrimmunopet |