Cargando…

Effect of Refractive Correction Error on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness: A Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Study

BACKGROUND: Identifying and assessing retinal nerve fiber layer defects are important for diagnosing and managing glaucoma. We aimed to investigate the effect of refractive correction error on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured with Spectralis spectral-domain optical coherence tomog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Xiaoli, Chen, Yutong, Liu, Xianjie, Ning, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28030536
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.898564
_version_ 1782491727515353088
author Ma, Xiaoli
Chen, Yutong
Liu, Xianjie
Ning, Hong
author_facet Ma, Xiaoli
Chen, Yutong
Liu, Xianjie
Ning, Hong
author_sort Ma, Xiaoli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying and assessing retinal nerve fiber layer defects are important for diagnosing and managing glaucoma. We aimed to investigate the effect of refractive correction error on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured with Spectralis spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). MATERIAL/METHODS: We included 68 participants: 32 healthy (normal) and 36 glaucoma patients. RNFL thickness was measured using Spectralis SD-OCT circular scan. Measurements were made with a refractive correction of the spherical equivalent (SE), the SE+2.00D and the SE–2.00D. RESULTS: Average RNFL thickness was significantly higher in the normal group (105.88±10.47 μm) than in the glaucoma group (67.67±17.27 μm, P<0.001). In the normal group, +2.00D of refractive correction error significantly affected measurements of average (P<0.001) and inferior quadrant (P=0.037) RNFL thickness. In the glaucoma group, +2.00D of refractive correction error significantly increased average (P<0.001) and individual quadrant (superior: P=0.016; temporal: P=0.004; inferior: P=0.008; nasal: P=0.003) RNFL measurements compared with those made with the proper refractive correction. However, −2.00D of refractive correction error did not significantly affect RNFL thickness measurements in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Positive defocus error significantly affects RNFL thickness measurements made by the Spectralis SD-OCT. Negative defocus error did not affect RNFL measurement examined. Careful correction of refractive error is necessary to obtain accurate baseline and follow-up RNFL thickness measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5215193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52151932017-01-17 Effect of Refractive Correction Error on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness: A Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Study Ma, Xiaoli Chen, Yutong Liu, Xianjie Ning, Hong Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Identifying and assessing retinal nerve fiber layer defects are important for diagnosing and managing glaucoma. We aimed to investigate the effect of refractive correction error on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured with Spectralis spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). MATERIAL/METHODS: We included 68 participants: 32 healthy (normal) and 36 glaucoma patients. RNFL thickness was measured using Spectralis SD-OCT circular scan. Measurements were made with a refractive correction of the spherical equivalent (SE), the SE+2.00D and the SE–2.00D. RESULTS: Average RNFL thickness was significantly higher in the normal group (105.88±10.47 μm) than in the glaucoma group (67.67±17.27 μm, P<0.001). In the normal group, +2.00D of refractive correction error significantly affected measurements of average (P<0.001) and inferior quadrant (P=0.037) RNFL thickness. In the glaucoma group, +2.00D of refractive correction error significantly increased average (P<0.001) and individual quadrant (superior: P=0.016; temporal: P=0.004; inferior: P=0.008; nasal: P=0.003) RNFL measurements compared with those made with the proper refractive correction. However, −2.00D of refractive correction error did not significantly affect RNFL thickness measurements in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Positive defocus error significantly affects RNFL thickness measurements made by the Spectralis SD-OCT. Negative defocus error did not affect RNFL measurement examined. Careful correction of refractive error is necessary to obtain accurate baseline and follow-up RNFL thickness measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5215193/ /pubmed/28030536 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.898564 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2016 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ma, Xiaoli
Chen, Yutong
Liu, Xianjie
Ning, Hong
Effect of Refractive Correction Error on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness: A Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Study
title Effect of Refractive Correction Error on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness: A Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Study
title_full Effect of Refractive Correction Error on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness: A Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Study
title_fullStr Effect of Refractive Correction Error on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness: A Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Refractive Correction Error on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness: A Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Study
title_short Effect of Refractive Correction Error on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness: A Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Study
title_sort effect of refractive correction error on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness: a spectralis optical coherence tomography study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28030536
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.898564
work_keys_str_mv AT maxiaoli effectofrefractivecorrectionerroronretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessaspectralisopticalcoherencetomographystudy
AT chenyutong effectofrefractivecorrectionerroronretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessaspectralisopticalcoherencetomographystudy
AT liuxianjie effectofrefractivecorrectionerroronretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessaspectralisopticalcoherencetomographystudy
AT ninghong effectofrefractivecorrectionerroronretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessaspectralisopticalcoherencetomographystudy