Cargando…

Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND: Performance tests are used for multiple purposes in exercise and sport science. Ensuring that a test displays an appropriate level of measurement properties for use within a population is important to ensure confidence in test findings. The aim of this study was to obtain subject matter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robertson, Sam, Kremer, Peter, Aisbett, Brad, Tran, Jacqueline, Cerin, Ester
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28054257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-016-0071-y
_version_ 1782491729283252224
author Robertson, Sam
Kremer, Peter
Aisbett, Brad
Tran, Jacqueline
Cerin, Ester
author_facet Robertson, Sam
Kremer, Peter
Aisbett, Brad
Tran, Jacqueline
Cerin, Ester
author_sort Robertson, Sam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Performance tests are used for multiple purposes in exercise and sport science. Ensuring that a test displays an appropriate level of measurement properties for use within a population is important to ensure confidence in test findings. The aim of this study was to obtain subject matter expert consensus on the measurement and feasibility properties that should be considered for performance tests used in the exercise and sport sciences and how these should be defined. This information was used to develop a checklist for broader dissemination. METHODS: A two-round Delphi study was undertaken including 33 exercise scientists, academics and sport scientists. Participants were asked to rate the importance of a range of measurement properties relevant to performance tests in exercise and sport science. Responses were obtained in binary and Likert-scale formats, with consensus defined as achieving 67% agreement on each question. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on definitions and terminology for all items. Ten level 1 items (those that achieved consensus on all four questions) and nine level 2 items (those achieving consensus on ≥2 questions) were included. Both levels were included in the final checklist. CONCLUSIONS: The checklist developed from this study can be used to inform decision-making and test selection for practitioners and researchers in the exercise and sport sciences. This can facilitate knowledge sharing and performance comparisons across sub-disciplines, thereby improving existing field practice and research methodological quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5215201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52152012017-01-18 Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study Robertson, Sam Kremer, Peter Aisbett, Brad Tran, Jacqueline Cerin, Ester Sports Med Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Performance tests are used for multiple purposes in exercise and sport science. Ensuring that a test displays an appropriate level of measurement properties for use within a population is important to ensure confidence in test findings. The aim of this study was to obtain subject matter expert consensus on the measurement and feasibility properties that should be considered for performance tests used in the exercise and sport sciences and how these should be defined. This information was used to develop a checklist for broader dissemination. METHODS: A two-round Delphi study was undertaken including 33 exercise scientists, academics and sport scientists. Participants were asked to rate the importance of a range of measurement properties relevant to performance tests in exercise and sport science. Responses were obtained in binary and Likert-scale formats, with consensus defined as achieving 67% agreement on each question. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on definitions and terminology for all items. Ten level 1 items (those that achieved consensus on all four questions) and nine level 2 items (those achieving consensus on ≥2 questions) were included. Both levels were included in the final checklist. CONCLUSIONS: The checklist developed from this study can be used to inform decision-making and test selection for practitioners and researchers in the exercise and sport sciences. This can facilitate knowledge sharing and performance comparisons across sub-disciplines, thereby improving existing field practice and research methodological quality. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5215201/ /pubmed/28054257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-016-0071-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Robertson, Sam
Kremer, Peter
Aisbett, Brad
Tran, Jacqueline
Cerin, Ester
Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study
title Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study
title_full Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study
title_fullStr Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study
title_short Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study
title_sort consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a delphi study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28054257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-016-0071-y
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsonsam consensusonmeasurementpropertiesandfeasibilityofperformancetestsfortheexerciseandsportsciencesadelphistudy
AT kremerpeter consensusonmeasurementpropertiesandfeasibilityofperformancetestsfortheexerciseandsportsciencesadelphistudy
AT aisbettbrad consensusonmeasurementpropertiesandfeasibilityofperformancetestsfortheexerciseandsportsciencesadelphistudy
AT tranjacqueline consensusonmeasurementpropertiesandfeasibilityofperformancetestsfortheexerciseandsportsciencesadelphistudy
AT cerinester consensusonmeasurementpropertiesandfeasibilityofperformancetestsfortheexerciseandsportsciencesadelphistudy