Cargando…

Using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants

When organisms with similar phenotypes have conflicting management and conservation initiatives, approaches are needed to differentiate among subpopulations or discrete groups. For example, the eastern metapopulation of the double‐crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) has a migratory phenotype t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheehan, Kate L., Esswein, Samuel T., Dorr, Brian S., Yarrow, Greg K., Johnson, Ron J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2620
_version_ 1782491743310053376
author Sheehan, Kate L.
Esswein, Samuel T.
Dorr, Brian S.
Yarrow, Greg K.
Johnson, Ron J.
author_facet Sheehan, Kate L.
Esswein, Samuel T.
Dorr, Brian S.
Yarrow, Greg K.
Johnson, Ron J.
author_sort Sheehan, Kate L.
collection PubMed
description When organisms with similar phenotypes have conflicting management and conservation initiatives, approaches are needed to differentiate among subpopulations or discrete groups. For example, the eastern metapopulation of the double‐crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) has a migratory phenotype that is culled because they are viewed as a threat to commercial and natural resources, whereas resident birds are targeted for conservation. Understanding the distinct breeding habitats of resident versus migratory cormorants would aid in identification and management decisions. Here, we use species distribution models (SDM: Maxent) of cormorant nesting habitat to examine the eastern P. auritus metapopulation and the predicted breeding sites of its phenotypes. We then estimate the phenotypic identity of breeding colonies of cormorants where management plans are being developed. We transferred SDMs trained on data from resident bird colonies in Florida and migratory bird colonies in Minnesota to South Carolina in an effort to identify the phenotype of breeding cormorants there based on the local landscape characteristics. Nesting habitat characteristics of cormorant colonies in South Carolina more closely resembled those of the Florida phenotype than those of birds of the Minnesota phenotype. The presence of the resident phenotype in summer suggests that migratory and resident cormorants will co‐occur in South Carolina in winter. Thus, there is an opportunity for separate management strategies for the two phenotypes in that state. We found differences in nesting habitat characteristics that could be used to refine management strategies and reduce human conflicts with abundant winter migrants and, at the same time, conserve less common colonies of resident cormorants. The models we use here show potential for advancing the study of geographically overlapping phenotypes with differing conservation and management priorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5215296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52152962017-01-09 Using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants Sheehan, Kate L. Esswein, Samuel T. Dorr, Brian S. Yarrow, Greg K. Johnson, Ron J. Ecol Evol Original Research When organisms with similar phenotypes have conflicting management and conservation initiatives, approaches are needed to differentiate among subpopulations or discrete groups. For example, the eastern metapopulation of the double‐crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) has a migratory phenotype that is culled because they are viewed as a threat to commercial and natural resources, whereas resident birds are targeted for conservation. Understanding the distinct breeding habitats of resident versus migratory cormorants would aid in identification and management decisions. Here, we use species distribution models (SDM: Maxent) of cormorant nesting habitat to examine the eastern P. auritus metapopulation and the predicted breeding sites of its phenotypes. We then estimate the phenotypic identity of breeding colonies of cormorants where management plans are being developed. We transferred SDMs trained on data from resident bird colonies in Florida and migratory bird colonies in Minnesota to South Carolina in an effort to identify the phenotype of breeding cormorants there based on the local landscape characteristics. Nesting habitat characteristics of cormorant colonies in South Carolina more closely resembled those of the Florida phenotype than those of birds of the Minnesota phenotype. The presence of the resident phenotype in summer suggests that migratory and resident cormorants will co‐occur in South Carolina in winter. Thus, there is an opportunity for separate management strategies for the two phenotypes in that state. We found differences in nesting habitat characteristics that could be used to refine management strategies and reduce human conflicts with abundant winter migrants and, at the same time, conserve less common colonies of resident cormorants. The models we use here show potential for advancing the study of geographically overlapping phenotypes with differing conservation and management priorities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5215296/ /pubmed/28070303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2620 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sheehan, Kate L.
Esswein, Samuel T.
Dorr, Brian S.
Yarrow, Greg K.
Johnson, Ron J.
Using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants
title Using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants
title_full Using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants
title_fullStr Using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants
title_full_unstemmed Using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants
title_short Using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants
title_sort using species distribution models to define nesting habitat of the eastern metapopulation of double‐crested cormorants
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2620
work_keys_str_mv AT sheehankatel usingspeciesdistributionmodelstodefinenestinghabitatoftheeasternmetapopulationofdoublecrestedcormorants
AT essweinsamuelt usingspeciesdistributionmodelstodefinenestinghabitatoftheeasternmetapopulationofdoublecrestedcormorants
AT dorrbrians usingspeciesdistributionmodelstodefinenestinghabitatoftheeasternmetapopulationofdoublecrestedcormorants
AT yarrowgregk usingspeciesdistributionmodelstodefinenestinghabitatoftheeasternmetapopulationofdoublecrestedcormorants
AT johnsonronj usingspeciesdistributionmodelstodefinenestinghabitatoftheeasternmetapopulationofdoublecrestedcormorants