Cargando…

Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures

BACKGROUND: The concurrent impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures on vitamin D production and cutaneous DNA damage, potentially leading to mutagenesis and skin cancer, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This is an experimental study (i) to determine the dual impact of repeated low‐level sunligh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Felton, S.J., Cooke, M.S., Kift, R., Berry, J.L., Webb, A.R., Lam, P.M.W., de Gruijl, F.R., Vail, A., Rhodes, L.E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14863
_version_ 1782491795217711104
author Felton, S.J.
Cooke, M.S.
Kift, R.
Berry, J.L.
Webb, A.R.
Lam, P.M.W.
de Gruijl, F.R.
Vail, A.
Rhodes, L.E.
author_facet Felton, S.J.
Cooke, M.S.
Kift, R.
Berry, J.L.
Webb, A.R.
Lam, P.M.W.
de Gruijl, F.R.
Vail, A.
Rhodes, L.E.
author_sort Felton, S.J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concurrent impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures on vitamin D production and cutaneous DNA damage, potentially leading to mutagenesis and skin cancer, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This is an experimental study (i) to determine the dual impact of repeated low‐level sunlight exposures on vitamin D status and DNA damage/repair (via both skin and urinary biomarkers) in light‐skinned adults; and (ii) to compare outcomes following the same exposures in brown‐skinned adults. METHODS: Ten white (phototype II) and six South Asian volunteers (phototype V), aged 23–59 years, received 6 weeks’ simulated summer sunlight exposures (95% ultraviolet A/5% ultraviolet B, 1·3 standard erythemal doses three times weekly) wearing summer clothing exposing ~35% body surface area. Assessments made were circulating 25‐hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], immunohistochemistry for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD)‐positive nuclei and urinary biomarkers of direct and oxidative (8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine) DNA damage. RESULTS: Serum 25(OH)D rose from mean 36·5 ± 13·0 to 54·3 ± 10·5 nmol L(−1) (14·6 ± 5·2 to 21·7 ± 4·2 ng mL(−1)) in phototype II vs. 17·2 ± 6·3 to 25·5 ± 9·5 nmol L(−1) (6·9 ± 2·5 to 10·2 ± 3·8 ng mL(−1)) in phototype V (P < 0·05). Phototype II skin showed CPD‐positive nuclei immediately postcourse, mean 44% (range 27–84) cleared after 24 h, contrasting with minimal DNA damage and full clearance in phototype V (P < 0·001). The findings did not differ from those following single ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure. Urinary CPDs remained below the detection threshold in both groups; 8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine was higher in phototype II than V (P = 0·002), but was unaffected by UVR. CONCLUSIONS: Low‐dose summer sunlight exposures confer vitamin D sufficiency in light‐skinned people concurrently with low‐level, nonaccumulating DNA damage. The same exposures produce minimal DNA damage but less vitamin D in brown‐skinned people. This informs tailoring of sun‐exposure policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5215649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52156492017-01-18 Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures Felton, S.J. Cooke, M.S. Kift, R. Berry, J.L. Webb, A.R. Lam, P.M.W. de Gruijl, F.R. Vail, A. Rhodes, L.E. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The concurrent impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures on vitamin D production and cutaneous DNA damage, potentially leading to mutagenesis and skin cancer, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This is an experimental study (i) to determine the dual impact of repeated low‐level sunlight exposures on vitamin D status and DNA damage/repair (via both skin and urinary biomarkers) in light‐skinned adults; and (ii) to compare outcomes following the same exposures in brown‐skinned adults. METHODS: Ten white (phototype II) and six South Asian volunteers (phototype V), aged 23–59 years, received 6 weeks’ simulated summer sunlight exposures (95% ultraviolet A/5% ultraviolet B, 1·3 standard erythemal doses three times weekly) wearing summer clothing exposing ~35% body surface area. Assessments made were circulating 25‐hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], immunohistochemistry for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD)‐positive nuclei and urinary biomarkers of direct and oxidative (8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine) DNA damage. RESULTS: Serum 25(OH)D rose from mean 36·5 ± 13·0 to 54·3 ± 10·5 nmol L(−1) (14·6 ± 5·2 to 21·7 ± 4·2 ng mL(−1)) in phototype II vs. 17·2 ± 6·3 to 25·5 ± 9·5 nmol L(−1) (6·9 ± 2·5 to 10·2 ± 3·8 ng mL(−1)) in phototype V (P < 0·05). Phototype II skin showed CPD‐positive nuclei immediately postcourse, mean 44% (range 27–84) cleared after 24 h, contrasting with minimal DNA damage and full clearance in phototype V (P < 0·001). The findings did not differ from those following single ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure. Urinary CPDs remained below the detection threshold in both groups; 8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine was higher in phototype II than V (P = 0·002), but was unaffected by UVR. CONCLUSIONS: Low‐dose summer sunlight exposures confer vitamin D sufficiency in light‐skinned people concurrently with low‐level, nonaccumulating DNA damage. The same exposures produce minimal DNA damage but less vitamin D in brown‐skinned people. This informs tailoring of sun‐exposure policies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-18 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5215649/ /pubmed/27411377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14863 Text en © 2016 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Felton, S.J.
Cooke, M.S.
Kift, R.
Berry, J.L.
Webb, A.R.
Lam, P.M.W.
de Gruijl, F.R.
Vail, A.
Rhodes, L.E.
Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
title Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
title_full Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
title_fullStr Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
title_short Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
title_sort concurrent beneficial (vitamin d production) and hazardous (cutaneous dna damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14863
work_keys_str_mv AT feltonsj concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures
AT cookems concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures
AT kiftr concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures
AT berryjl concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures
AT webbar concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures
AT lampmw concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures
AT degruijlfr concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures
AT vaila concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures
AT rhodesle concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures