Cargando…
Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
BACKGROUND: The concurrent impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures on vitamin D production and cutaneous DNA damage, potentially leading to mutagenesis and skin cancer, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This is an experimental study (i) to determine the dual impact of repeated low‐level sunligh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14863 |
_version_ | 1782491795217711104 |
---|---|
author | Felton, S.J. Cooke, M.S. Kift, R. Berry, J.L. Webb, A.R. Lam, P.M.W. de Gruijl, F.R. Vail, A. Rhodes, L.E. |
author_facet | Felton, S.J. Cooke, M.S. Kift, R. Berry, J.L. Webb, A.R. Lam, P.M.W. de Gruijl, F.R. Vail, A. Rhodes, L.E. |
author_sort | Felton, S.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The concurrent impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures on vitamin D production and cutaneous DNA damage, potentially leading to mutagenesis and skin cancer, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This is an experimental study (i) to determine the dual impact of repeated low‐level sunlight exposures on vitamin D status and DNA damage/repair (via both skin and urinary biomarkers) in light‐skinned adults; and (ii) to compare outcomes following the same exposures in brown‐skinned adults. METHODS: Ten white (phototype II) and six South Asian volunteers (phototype V), aged 23–59 years, received 6 weeks’ simulated summer sunlight exposures (95% ultraviolet A/5% ultraviolet B, 1·3 standard erythemal doses three times weekly) wearing summer clothing exposing ~35% body surface area. Assessments made were circulating 25‐hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], immunohistochemistry for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD)‐positive nuclei and urinary biomarkers of direct and oxidative (8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine) DNA damage. RESULTS: Serum 25(OH)D rose from mean 36·5 ± 13·0 to 54·3 ± 10·5 nmol L(−1) (14·6 ± 5·2 to 21·7 ± 4·2 ng mL(−1)) in phototype II vs. 17·2 ± 6·3 to 25·5 ± 9·5 nmol L(−1) (6·9 ± 2·5 to 10·2 ± 3·8 ng mL(−1)) in phototype V (P < 0·05). Phototype II skin showed CPD‐positive nuclei immediately postcourse, mean 44% (range 27–84) cleared after 24 h, contrasting with minimal DNA damage and full clearance in phototype V (P < 0·001). The findings did not differ from those following single ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure. Urinary CPDs remained below the detection threshold in both groups; 8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine was higher in phototype II than V (P = 0·002), but was unaffected by UVR. CONCLUSIONS: Low‐dose summer sunlight exposures confer vitamin D sufficiency in light‐skinned people concurrently with low‐level, nonaccumulating DNA damage. The same exposures produce minimal DNA damage but less vitamin D in brown‐skinned people. This informs tailoring of sun‐exposure policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5215649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52156492017-01-18 Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures Felton, S.J. Cooke, M.S. Kift, R. Berry, J.L. Webb, A.R. Lam, P.M.W. de Gruijl, F.R. Vail, A. Rhodes, L.E. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The concurrent impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures on vitamin D production and cutaneous DNA damage, potentially leading to mutagenesis and skin cancer, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This is an experimental study (i) to determine the dual impact of repeated low‐level sunlight exposures on vitamin D status and DNA damage/repair (via both skin and urinary biomarkers) in light‐skinned adults; and (ii) to compare outcomes following the same exposures in brown‐skinned adults. METHODS: Ten white (phototype II) and six South Asian volunteers (phototype V), aged 23–59 years, received 6 weeks’ simulated summer sunlight exposures (95% ultraviolet A/5% ultraviolet B, 1·3 standard erythemal doses three times weekly) wearing summer clothing exposing ~35% body surface area. Assessments made were circulating 25‐hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], immunohistochemistry for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD)‐positive nuclei and urinary biomarkers of direct and oxidative (8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine) DNA damage. RESULTS: Serum 25(OH)D rose from mean 36·5 ± 13·0 to 54·3 ± 10·5 nmol L(−1) (14·6 ± 5·2 to 21·7 ± 4·2 ng mL(−1)) in phototype II vs. 17·2 ± 6·3 to 25·5 ± 9·5 nmol L(−1) (6·9 ± 2·5 to 10·2 ± 3·8 ng mL(−1)) in phototype V (P < 0·05). Phototype II skin showed CPD‐positive nuclei immediately postcourse, mean 44% (range 27–84) cleared after 24 h, contrasting with minimal DNA damage and full clearance in phototype V (P < 0·001). The findings did not differ from those following single ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure. Urinary CPDs remained below the detection threshold in both groups; 8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine was higher in phototype II than V (P = 0·002), but was unaffected by UVR. CONCLUSIONS: Low‐dose summer sunlight exposures confer vitamin D sufficiency in light‐skinned people concurrently with low‐level, nonaccumulating DNA damage. The same exposures produce minimal DNA damage but less vitamin D in brown‐skinned people. This informs tailoring of sun‐exposure policies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-18 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5215649/ /pubmed/27411377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14863 Text en © 2016 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Felton, S.J. Cooke, M.S. Kift, R. Berry, J.L. Webb, A.R. Lam, P.M.W. de Gruijl, F.R. Vail, A. Rhodes, L.E. Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures |
title | Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
|
title_full | Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
|
title_fullStr | Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
|
title_full_unstemmed | Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
|
title_short | Concurrent beneficial (vitamin D production) and hazardous (cutaneous DNA damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures
|
title_sort | concurrent beneficial (vitamin d production) and hazardous (cutaneous dna damage) impact of repeated low‐level summer sunlight exposures |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5215649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feltonsj concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures AT cookems concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures AT kiftr concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures AT berryjl concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures AT webbar concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures AT lampmw concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures AT degruijlfr concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures AT vaila concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures AT rhodesle concurrentbeneficialvitamindproductionandhazardouscutaneousdnadamageimpactofrepeatedlowlevelsummersunlightexposures |