Cargando…

Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?

INTRODUCTION: The following research questions were answered: (1) What are the training pathways followed by the current robot professionals? (2) Are there any differences between the surgical specialties in robot training and robot use? (3) What is their opinion about multidisciplinary basic skills...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinkman, Willem, de Angst, Isabel, Schreuder, Henk, Schout, Barbara, Draaisma, Werner, Verweij, Lisanne, Hendrikx, Ad, van der Poel, Henk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4970-2
_version_ 1782491859065503744
author Brinkman, Willem
de Angst, Isabel
Schreuder, Henk
Schout, Barbara
Draaisma, Werner
Verweij, Lisanne
Hendrikx, Ad
van der Poel, Henk
author_facet Brinkman, Willem
de Angst, Isabel
Schreuder, Henk
Schout, Barbara
Draaisma, Werner
Verweij, Lisanne
Hendrikx, Ad
van der Poel, Henk
author_sort Brinkman, Willem
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The following research questions were answered: (1) What are the training pathways followed by the current robot professionals? (2) Are there any differences between the surgical specialties in robot training and robot use? (3) What is their opinion about multidisciplinary basic skills training? METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to 91 robot professionals in The Netherlands. The questionnaire contained 21 multiple-choice questions focusing on demographics, received robot training, and their opinion on basic skills training in robotic surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 62 % (n = 56): 13 general surgeons, 16 gynecologists, and 27 urologists. The urologists performed significantly more robotic procedures than surgeons and gynecologists. The kind of training of all professionals varied from a training program by Intuitive Surgical, master-apprenticeship with or without duo console, fellowship, and self-designed training programs. The training did neither differ significantly among the different specialties nor the year of starting robotic surgery. Majority of respondents favor an obliged training program including an examination for the basics of robot skills training. CONCLUSION: Training of the current robot professionals is mostly dependent on local circumstances and the manufacturer of the robot system. Training is independent of the year of start with robotic surgery and speciality. To guarantee the quality of future training of residents and fellows in robot-assisted surgery, clear training goals should be formulated and implemented. Since this study shows that current training of different specialities does not differ, training in robotic surgery could be started by a multidisciplinary basic skills training and assessment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4970-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5216079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52160792017-01-18 Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach? Brinkman, Willem de Angst, Isabel Schreuder, Henk Schout, Barbara Draaisma, Werner Verweij, Lisanne Hendrikx, Ad van der Poel, Henk Surg Endosc Article INTRODUCTION: The following research questions were answered: (1) What are the training pathways followed by the current robot professionals? (2) Are there any differences between the surgical specialties in robot training and robot use? (3) What is their opinion about multidisciplinary basic skills training? METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to 91 robot professionals in The Netherlands. The questionnaire contained 21 multiple-choice questions focusing on demographics, received robot training, and their opinion on basic skills training in robotic surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 62 % (n = 56): 13 general surgeons, 16 gynecologists, and 27 urologists. The urologists performed significantly more robotic procedures than surgeons and gynecologists. The kind of training of all professionals varied from a training program by Intuitive Surgical, master-apprenticeship with or without duo console, fellowship, and self-designed training programs. The training did neither differ significantly among the different specialties nor the year of starting robotic surgery. Majority of respondents favor an obliged training program including an examination for the basics of robot skills training. CONCLUSION: Training of the current robot professionals is mostly dependent on local circumstances and the manufacturer of the robot system. Training is independent of the year of start with robotic surgery and speciality. To guarantee the quality of future training of residents and fellows in robot-assisted surgery, clear training goals should be formulated and implemented. Since this study shows that current training of different specialities does not differ, training in robotic surgery could be started by a multidisciplinary basic skills training and assessment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4970-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-05-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5216079/ /pubmed/27194262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4970-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Brinkman, Willem
de Angst, Isabel
Schreuder, Henk
Schout, Barbara
Draaisma, Werner
Verweij, Lisanne
Hendrikx, Ad
van der Poel, Henk
Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
title Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
title_full Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
title_fullStr Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
title_full_unstemmed Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
title_short Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
title_sort current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the netherlands: time for a multidisciplinary approach?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4970-2
work_keys_str_mv AT brinkmanwillem currenttrainingonthebasicsofroboticsurgeryinthenetherlandstimeforamultidisciplinaryapproach
AT deangstisabel currenttrainingonthebasicsofroboticsurgeryinthenetherlandstimeforamultidisciplinaryapproach
AT schreuderhenk currenttrainingonthebasicsofroboticsurgeryinthenetherlandstimeforamultidisciplinaryapproach
AT schoutbarbara currenttrainingonthebasicsofroboticsurgeryinthenetherlandstimeforamultidisciplinaryapproach
AT draaismawerner currenttrainingonthebasicsofroboticsurgeryinthenetherlandstimeforamultidisciplinaryapproach
AT verweijlisanne currenttrainingonthebasicsofroboticsurgeryinthenetherlandstimeforamultidisciplinaryapproach
AT hendrikxad currenttrainingonthebasicsofroboticsurgeryinthenetherlandstimeforamultidisciplinaryapproach
AT vanderpoelhenk currenttrainingonthebasicsofroboticsurgeryinthenetherlandstimeforamultidisciplinaryapproach