Cargando…

Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier(®) Versus No Hyalobarrier(®) on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION: Periadnexal adhesions are known to contribute to subfertility. The restoration of the tubo-ovarian anatomy is one the key principles in reproductive surgery, and this involves adhesiolysis. However, adhesion formation/reformation is very common after periovarian adhesiolysis. It is not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheong, Ying, Bailey, Sarah, Forbes, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0453-z
_version_ 1782491860413972480
author Cheong, Ying
Bailey, Sarah
Forbes, Jane
author_facet Cheong, Ying
Bailey, Sarah
Forbes, Jane
author_sort Cheong, Ying
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Periadnexal adhesions are known to contribute to subfertility. The restoration of the tubo-ovarian anatomy is one the key principles in reproductive surgery, and this involves adhesiolysis. However, adhesion formation/reformation is very common after periovarian adhesiolysis. It is not known if the application of Hyalobarrier(®), an anti-adhesion gel, around the adnexal region postsurgery influences ovulatory status. The study is a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomizing women into the application of Hyalobarrier(®) versus no Hyalobarrier(®) at the time of laparoscopy, where postsurgical ovulatory status and pregnancy rates were evaluated. METHODS: This was a pilot RCT where women were recruited from the gynecological and subfertility clinic who were deemed to require an operative laparoscopy. If intraoperatively they were found to have periovarian adhesions, they were randomized into having adhesiolysis with and without usage of Hyalobarrier(®). Demographic details and intraoperative details including the severity, extent, and the ease of use of Hyalobarrier(®) were recorded. Prior to the surgery and postoperatively, the participants had their serum hormonal status (day 2 FSH, LH and day 21 progesterone) evaluated. Postoperatively, they underwent a follicular tracking cycle at 3 months. RESULTS: Fifteen women were randomized into use of Hyalobarrier(®) (study group) and 15 into the no Hyalobarrier(®) group (control group) between December 2011 and January 2014. There was no difference in the patient characteristics in terms of age, BMI, the number of previous pregnancies, or the extent, site, and severity of adhesions between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the study versus control groups in terms of the hormonal profile (day 2 FSH and day 21 progesterone) before or after surgery. The 3-month postoperative day 10–12 follicular tracking findings and endometrial thickness were similar between the study and control groups. Four women were pregnant in the study group (24%) and one in the control group (7%) cumulatively over 2 years. CONCLUSION: The use of Hyalobarrier(®) post salpingo-ovariolysis did not influence follicular development as inferred from the results of the day 21 progesterone and folliculogram on day 10–12 3-month postsurgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN number, ISRCTN1833588. FUNDING: Nordic Pharma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5216085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52160852017-01-18 Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier(®) Versus No Hyalobarrier(®) on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study Cheong, Ying Bailey, Sarah Forbes, Jane Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Periadnexal adhesions are known to contribute to subfertility. The restoration of the tubo-ovarian anatomy is one the key principles in reproductive surgery, and this involves adhesiolysis. However, adhesion formation/reformation is very common after periovarian adhesiolysis. It is not known if the application of Hyalobarrier(®), an anti-adhesion gel, around the adnexal region postsurgery influences ovulatory status. The study is a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomizing women into the application of Hyalobarrier(®) versus no Hyalobarrier(®) at the time of laparoscopy, where postsurgical ovulatory status and pregnancy rates were evaluated. METHODS: This was a pilot RCT where women were recruited from the gynecological and subfertility clinic who were deemed to require an operative laparoscopy. If intraoperatively they were found to have periovarian adhesions, they were randomized into having adhesiolysis with and without usage of Hyalobarrier(®). Demographic details and intraoperative details including the severity, extent, and the ease of use of Hyalobarrier(®) were recorded. Prior to the surgery and postoperatively, the participants had their serum hormonal status (day 2 FSH, LH and day 21 progesterone) evaluated. Postoperatively, they underwent a follicular tracking cycle at 3 months. RESULTS: Fifteen women were randomized into use of Hyalobarrier(®) (study group) and 15 into the no Hyalobarrier(®) group (control group) between December 2011 and January 2014. There was no difference in the patient characteristics in terms of age, BMI, the number of previous pregnancies, or the extent, site, and severity of adhesions between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the study versus control groups in terms of the hormonal profile (day 2 FSH and day 21 progesterone) before or after surgery. The 3-month postoperative day 10–12 follicular tracking findings and endometrial thickness were similar between the study and control groups. Four women were pregnant in the study group (24%) and one in the control group (7%) cumulatively over 2 years. CONCLUSION: The use of Hyalobarrier(®) post salpingo-ovariolysis did not influence follicular development as inferred from the results of the day 21 progesterone and folliculogram on day 10–12 3-month postsurgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN number, ISRCTN1833588. FUNDING: Nordic Pharma. Springer Healthcare 2016-11-29 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5216085/ /pubmed/27900662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0453-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cheong, Ying
Bailey, Sarah
Forbes, Jane
Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier(®) Versus No Hyalobarrier(®) on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study
title Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier(®) Versus No Hyalobarrier(®) on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study
title_full Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier(®) Versus No Hyalobarrier(®) on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier(®) Versus No Hyalobarrier(®) on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier(®) Versus No Hyalobarrier(®) on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study
title_short Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyalobarrier(®) Versus No Hyalobarrier(®) on the Ovulatory Status of Women with Periovarian Adhesions: A Pilot Study
title_sort randomized controlled trial of hyalobarrier(®) versus no hyalobarrier(®) on the ovulatory status of women with periovarian adhesions: a pilot study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0453-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cheongying randomizedcontrolledtrialofhyalobarrierversusnohyalobarrierontheovulatorystatusofwomenwithperiovarianadhesionsapilotstudy
AT baileysarah randomizedcontrolledtrialofhyalobarrierversusnohyalobarrierontheovulatorystatusofwomenwithperiovarianadhesionsapilotstudy
AT forbesjane randomizedcontrolledtrialofhyalobarrierversusnohyalobarrierontheovulatorystatusofwomenwithperiovarianadhesionsapilotstudy