Cargando…

Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dosage and imaging conditions for patients undergoing intraoral radiography at Meikai University Hospital and establish assurance and quality control data. METHODS: Tube voltage, exposure time, and air kinetic energy released per unit mass (air kerma) of three intraoral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izawa, Maki, Harata, Yasuo, Shiba, Noriyoshi, Koizumi, Nobuhide, Ozawa, Tomonori, Takahashi, Nobutoshi, Okumura, Yasuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28111498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-016-0245-9
_version_ 1782491861920776192
author Izawa, Maki
Harata, Yasuo
Shiba, Noriyoshi
Koizumi, Nobuhide
Ozawa, Tomonori
Takahashi, Nobutoshi
Okumura, Yasuhiko
author_facet Izawa, Maki
Harata, Yasuo
Shiba, Noriyoshi
Koizumi, Nobuhide
Ozawa, Tomonori
Takahashi, Nobutoshi
Okumura, Yasuhiko
author_sort Izawa, Maki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dosage and imaging conditions for patients undergoing intraoral radiography at Meikai University Hospital and establish assurance and quality control data. METHODS: Tube voltage, exposure time, and air kinetic energy released per unit mass (air kerma) of three intraoral radiography units were measured. To calculate the patient entrance dose (PED) for each radiograph using Insight film, we extracted data for 1063 patients from their exposure records. The PED was compared with the diagnostic reference level (DRL) from the European Commission and the UK. RESULTS: The tube voltage of the three units was maintained at 60 ± 2 kV. Differences in exposure time were less than 1.7 % for all units. The air kerma rates were well maintained within a 4.2 % error. Based on the patient data, there were no significant differences in the mean exposure times for males and females for all anatomical sites. The mean PED ranged from 1.09 ± 0.31 mGy for the mandibular incisors to 2.42 ± 0.33 mGy for the maxillary molars. The mean PED at the mandibular molars using InSight film was 1.59 ± 0.20 mGy, being less than the recommended value based on the DRL for intraoral radiography in the UK. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that radiographic conditions at the hospital have been properly maintained. This basic quality control data may assist other dental radiation facilities to reduce patient dosage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5216092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52160922017-01-18 Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography Izawa, Maki Harata, Yasuo Shiba, Noriyoshi Koizumi, Nobuhide Ozawa, Tomonori Takahashi, Nobutoshi Okumura, Yasuhiko Oral Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dosage and imaging conditions for patients undergoing intraoral radiography at Meikai University Hospital and establish assurance and quality control data. METHODS: Tube voltage, exposure time, and air kinetic energy released per unit mass (air kerma) of three intraoral radiography units were measured. To calculate the patient entrance dose (PED) for each radiograph using Insight film, we extracted data for 1063 patients from their exposure records. The PED was compared with the diagnostic reference level (DRL) from the European Commission and the UK. RESULTS: The tube voltage of the three units was maintained at 60 ± 2 kV. Differences in exposure time were less than 1.7 % for all units. The air kerma rates were well maintained within a 4.2 % error. Based on the patient data, there were no significant differences in the mean exposure times for males and females for all anatomical sites. The mean PED ranged from 1.09 ± 0.31 mGy for the mandibular incisors to 2.42 ± 0.33 mGy for the maxillary molars. The mean PED at the mandibular molars using InSight film was 1.59 ± 0.20 mGy, being less than the recommended value based on the DRL for intraoral radiography in the UK. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that radiographic conditions at the hospital have been properly maintained. This basic quality control data may assist other dental radiation facilities to reduce patient dosage. Springer Japan 2016-05-03 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5216092/ /pubmed/28111498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-016-0245-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Izawa, Maki
Harata, Yasuo
Shiba, Noriyoshi
Koizumi, Nobuhide
Ozawa, Tomonori
Takahashi, Nobutoshi
Okumura, Yasuhiko
Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography
title Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography
title_full Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography
title_fullStr Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography
title_full_unstemmed Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography
title_short Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography
title_sort establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28111498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-016-0245-9
work_keys_str_mv AT izawamaki establishmentoflocaldiagnosticreferencelevelsforqualitycontrolinintraoralradiography
AT haratayasuo establishmentoflocaldiagnosticreferencelevelsforqualitycontrolinintraoralradiography
AT shibanoriyoshi establishmentoflocaldiagnosticreferencelevelsforqualitycontrolinintraoralradiography
AT koizuminobuhide establishmentoflocaldiagnosticreferencelevelsforqualitycontrolinintraoralradiography
AT ozawatomonori establishmentoflocaldiagnosticreferencelevelsforqualitycontrolinintraoralradiography
AT takahashinobutoshi establishmentoflocaldiagnosticreferencelevelsforqualitycontrolinintraoralradiography
AT okumurayasuhiko establishmentoflocaldiagnosticreferencelevelsforqualitycontrolinintraoralradiography