Cargando…

Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science

BACKGROUND: Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bloss, Cinnamon, Nebeker, Camille, Bietz, Matthew, Bae, Deborah, Bigby, Barbara, Devereaux, Mary, Fowler, James, Waldo, Ann, Weibel, Nadir, Patrick, Kevin, Klemmer, Scott, Melichar, Lori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28007687
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6634
_version_ 1782491890406391808
author Bloss, Cinnamon
Nebeker, Camille
Bietz, Matthew
Bae, Deborah
Bigby, Barbara
Devereaux, Mary
Fowler, James
Waldo, Ann
Weibel, Nadir
Patrick, Kevin
Klemmer, Scott
Melichar, Lori
author_facet Bloss, Cinnamon
Nebeker, Camille
Bietz, Matthew
Bae, Deborah
Bigby, Barbara
Devereaux, Mary
Fowler, James
Waldo, Ann
Weibel, Nadir
Patrick, Kevin
Klemmer, Scott
Melichar, Lori
author_sort Bloss, Cinnamon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human research oversight system. METHODS: A total of 11 researchers and institutional review board (IRB) professionals participated in a January 2015 design thinking workshop to develop ideas for redesigning the IRB system. RESULTS: Ideas in 5 major domains were generated. The areas of focus were (1) improving the consent form and process, (2) empowering researchers to protect their participants, (3) creating a system to learn from mistakes, (4) improving IRB efficiency, and (5) facilitating review of research that leverages technological advances. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the impetus for and results of a design thinking workshop to reimagine a human research protections system that is responsive to 21st century science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5216254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52162542017-01-17 Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science Bloss, Cinnamon Nebeker, Camille Bietz, Matthew Bae, Deborah Bigby, Barbara Devereaux, Mary Fowler, James Waldo, Ann Weibel, Nadir Patrick, Kevin Klemmer, Scott Melichar, Lori J Med Internet Res Viewpoint BACKGROUND: Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human research oversight system. METHODS: A total of 11 researchers and institutional review board (IRB) professionals participated in a January 2015 design thinking workshop to develop ideas for redesigning the IRB system. RESULTS: Ideas in 5 major domains were generated. The areas of focus were (1) improving the consent form and process, (2) empowering researchers to protect their participants, (3) creating a system to learn from mistakes, (4) improving IRB efficiency, and (5) facilitating review of research that leverages technological advances. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the impetus for and results of a design thinking workshop to reimagine a human research protections system that is responsive to 21st century science. JMIR Publications 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5216254/ /pubmed/28007687 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6634 Text en ©Cinnamon Bloss, Camille Nebeker, Matthew Bietz, Deborah Bae, Barbara Bigby, Mary Devereaux, James Fowler, Ann Waldo, Nadir Weibel, Kevin Patrick, Scott Klemmer, Lori Melichar. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 22.12.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Bloss, Cinnamon
Nebeker, Camille
Bietz, Matthew
Bae, Deborah
Bigby, Barbara
Devereaux, Mary
Fowler, James
Waldo, Ann
Weibel, Nadir
Patrick, Kevin
Klemmer, Scott
Melichar, Lori
Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science
title Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science
title_full Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science
title_fullStr Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science
title_full_unstemmed Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science
title_short Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science
title_sort reimagining human research protections for 21st century science
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28007687
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6634
work_keys_str_mv AT blosscinnamon reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT nebekercamille reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT bietzmatthew reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT baedeborah reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT bigbybarbara reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT devereauxmary reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT fowlerjames reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT waldoann reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT weibelnadir reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT patrickkevin reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT klemmerscott reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience
AT melicharlori reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience