Cargando…
Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science
BACKGROUND: Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human researc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28007687 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6634 |
_version_ | 1782491890406391808 |
---|---|
author | Bloss, Cinnamon Nebeker, Camille Bietz, Matthew Bae, Deborah Bigby, Barbara Devereaux, Mary Fowler, James Waldo, Ann Weibel, Nadir Patrick, Kevin Klemmer, Scott Melichar, Lori |
author_facet | Bloss, Cinnamon Nebeker, Camille Bietz, Matthew Bae, Deborah Bigby, Barbara Devereaux, Mary Fowler, James Waldo, Ann Weibel, Nadir Patrick, Kevin Klemmer, Scott Melichar, Lori |
author_sort | Bloss, Cinnamon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human research oversight system. METHODS: A total of 11 researchers and institutional review board (IRB) professionals participated in a January 2015 design thinking workshop to develop ideas for redesigning the IRB system. RESULTS: Ideas in 5 major domains were generated. The areas of focus were (1) improving the consent form and process, (2) empowering researchers to protect their participants, (3) creating a system to learn from mistakes, (4) improving IRB efficiency, and (5) facilitating review of research that leverages technological advances. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the impetus for and results of a design thinking workshop to reimagine a human research protections system that is responsive to 21st century science. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5216254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52162542017-01-17 Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science Bloss, Cinnamon Nebeker, Camille Bietz, Matthew Bae, Deborah Bigby, Barbara Devereaux, Mary Fowler, James Waldo, Ann Weibel, Nadir Patrick, Kevin Klemmer, Scott Melichar, Lori J Med Internet Res Viewpoint BACKGROUND: Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human research oversight system. METHODS: A total of 11 researchers and institutional review board (IRB) professionals participated in a January 2015 design thinking workshop to develop ideas for redesigning the IRB system. RESULTS: Ideas in 5 major domains were generated. The areas of focus were (1) improving the consent form and process, (2) empowering researchers to protect their participants, (3) creating a system to learn from mistakes, (4) improving IRB efficiency, and (5) facilitating review of research that leverages technological advances. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the impetus for and results of a design thinking workshop to reimagine a human research protections system that is responsive to 21st century science. JMIR Publications 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5216254/ /pubmed/28007687 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6634 Text en ©Cinnamon Bloss, Camille Nebeker, Matthew Bietz, Deborah Bae, Barbara Bigby, Mary Devereaux, James Fowler, Ann Waldo, Nadir Weibel, Kevin Patrick, Scott Klemmer, Lori Melichar. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 22.12.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Bloss, Cinnamon Nebeker, Camille Bietz, Matthew Bae, Deborah Bigby, Barbara Devereaux, Mary Fowler, James Waldo, Ann Weibel, Nadir Patrick, Kevin Klemmer, Scott Melichar, Lori Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science |
title | Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science |
title_full | Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science |
title_fullStr | Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science |
title_full_unstemmed | Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science |
title_short | Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science |
title_sort | reimagining human research protections for 21st century science |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28007687 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6634 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blosscinnamon reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT nebekercamille reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT bietzmatthew reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT baedeborah reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT bigbybarbara reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT devereauxmary reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT fowlerjames reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT waldoann reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT weibelnadir reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT patrickkevin reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT klemmerscott reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience AT melicharlori reimagininghumanresearchprotectionsfor21stcenturyscience |