Cargando…

Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes

Increasing attention has been paid to the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) because of the rapid increase in species loss. However, over the past 20 years, most BEF studies only focused on the effect of species diversity on one or a few ecosystem functions, and only a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jingpeng, Zheng, Zhirong, Xie, Hongtao, Zhao, Nianxi, Gao, Yubao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2604
_version_ 1782491948324487168
author Li, Jingpeng
Zheng, Zhirong
Xie, Hongtao
Zhao, Nianxi
Gao, Yubao
author_facet Li, Jingpeng
Zheng, Zhirong
Xie, Hongtao
Zhao, Nianxi
Gao, Yubao
author_sort Li, Jingpeng
collection PubMed
description Increasing attention has been paid to the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) because of the rapid increase in species loss. However, over the past 20 years, most BEF studies only focused on the effect of species diversity on one or a few ecosystem functions, and only a few studies focused on ecosystem multifunctionality (i.e., the simultaneous provision of several ecosystem functions). Grassland ecosystems have important economic, environmental, and esthetic value; thus, this study focused on the heterogeneous microcommunities in grasslands under three management modes. The multifunctionality index (M‐index) was assessed at community and microcommunity scales, and the relationship between species diversity and multifunctionality was investigated. The communities were found to be respectively composed of one, three, and six microcommunities in grazing, clipping, and enclosure management, based on a two‐way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) for community structure. Biodiversity and soil indicators showed an apparent degradation of the grazing community, which had the worst M‐index. Clipping and enclosure communities showed no significant difference in biodiversity indices, soil variables, and M‐index; however, these indices were clearly different among microcommunities. Therefore, the microcommunity scale may be suitable to investigate the relationship between vegetation and multifunctionality in seminatural grassland ecosystems. Dominant species richness had more explanatory power for ecosystem multifunctionality than subdominant species richness, rare species richness, and the number of all species. Therefore, it is important to distinguish the role and rank of different species in the species richness–multifunctionality model; otherwise, the model might include redundant and unclear information. Communities with more codominant species whose distribution is also even might have better multifunctionality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5216625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52166252017-01-09 Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes Li, Jingpeng Zheng, Zhirong Xie, Hongtao Zhao, Nianxi Gao, Yubao Ecol Evol Original Research Increasing attention has been paid to the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) because of the rapid increase in species loss. However, over the past 20 years, most BEF studies only focused on the effect of species diversity on one or a few ecosystem functions, and only a few studies focused on ecosystem multifunctionality (i.e., the simultaneous provision of several ecosystem functions). Grassland ecosystems have important economic, environmental, and esthetic value; thus, this study focused on the heterogeneous microcommunities in grasslands under three management modes. The multifunctionality index (M‐index) was assessed at community and microcommunity scales, and the relationship between species diversity and multifunctionality was investigated. The communities were found to be respectively composed of one, three, and six microcommunities in grazing, clipping, and enclosure management, based on a two‐way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) for community structure. Biodiversity and soil indicators showed an apparent degradation of the grazing community, which had the worst M‐index. Clipping and enclosure communities showed no significant difference in biodiversity indices, soil variables, and M‐index; however, these indices were clearly different among microcommunities. Therefore, the microcommunity scale may be suitable to investigate the relationship between vegetation and multifunctionality in seminatural grassland ecosystems. Dominant species richness had more explanatory power for ecosystem multifunctionality than subdominant species richness, rare species richness, and the number of all species. Therefore, it is important to distinguish the role and rank of different species in the species richness–multifunctionality model; otherwise, the model might include redundant and unclear information. Communities with more codominant species whose distribution is also even might have better multifunctionality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5216625/ /pubmed/28070271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2604 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Jingpeng
Zheng, Zhirong
Xie, Hongtao
Zhao, Nianxi
Gao, Yubao
Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes
title Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes
title_full Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes
title_fullStr Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes
title_short Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes
title_sort heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2604
work_keys_str_mv AT lijingpeng heterogeneousmicrocommunitiesandecosystemmultifunctionalityinseminaturalgrasslandsunderthreemanagementmodes
AT zhengzhirong heterogeneousmicrocommunitiesandecosystemmultifunctionalityinseminaturalgrasslandsunderthreemanagementmodes
AT xiehongtao heterogeneousmicrocommunitiesandecosystemmultifunctionalityinseminaturalgrasslandsunderthreemanagementmodes
AT zhaonianxi heterogeneousmicrocommunitiesandecosystemmultifunctionalityinseminaturalgrasslandsunderthreemanagementmodes
AT gaoyubao heterogeneousmicrocommunitiesandecosystemmultifunctionalityinseminaturalgrasslandsunderthreemanagementmodes