Cargando…

Evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management

The extensive spatial and temporal coverage of many citizen science datasets (CSD) makes them appealing for use in species distribution modeling and forecasting. However, a frequent limitation is the inability to validate results. Here, we aim to assess the reliability of CSD for forecasting species...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mair, Louise, Harrison, Philip J., Jönsson, Mari, Löbel, Swantje, Nordén, Jenni, Siitonen, Juha, Lämås, Tomas, Lundström, Anders, Snäll, Tord
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2601
_version_ 1782491958503014400
author Mair, Louise
Harrison, Philip J.
Jönsson, Mari
Löbel, Swantje
Nordén, Jenni
Siitonen, Juha
Lämås, Tomas
Lundström, Anders
Snäll, Tord
author_facet Mair, Louise
Harrison, Philip J.
Jönsson, Mari
Löbel, Swantje
Nordén, Jenni
Siitonen, Juha
Lämås, Tomas
Lundström, Anders
Snäll, Tord
author_sort Mair, Louise
collection PubMed
description The extensive spatial and temporal coverage of many citizen science datasets (CSD) makes them appealing for use in species distribution modeling and forecasting. However, a frequent limitation is the inability to validate results. Here, we aim to assess the reliability of CSD for forecasting species occurrence in response to national forest management projections (representing 160,366 km(2)) by comparison against forecasts from a model based on systematically collected colonization–extinction data. We fitted species distribution models using citizen science observations of an old‐forest indicator fungus Phellinus ferrugineofuscus. We applied five modeling approaches (generalized linear model, Poisson process model, Bayesian occupancy model, and two MaxEnt models). Models were used to forecast changes in occurrence in response to national forest management for 2020‐2110. Forecasts of species occurrence from models based on CSD were congruent with forecasts made using the colonization–extinction model based on systematically collected data, although different modeling methods indicated different levels of change. All models projected increased occurrence in set‐aside forest from 2020 to 2110: the projected increase varied between 125% and 195% among models based on CSD, in comparison with an increase of 129% according to the colonization–extinction model. All but one model based on CSD projected a decline in production forest, which varied between 11% and 49%, compared to a decline of 41% using the colonization–extinction model. All models thus highlighted the importance of protected old forest for P. ferrugineofuscus persistence. We conclude that models based on CSD can reproduce forecasts from models based on systematically collected colonization–extinction data and so lead to the same forest management conclusions. Our results show that the use of a suite of models allows CSD to be reliably applied to land management and conservation decision making, demonstrating that widely available CSD can be a valuable forecasting resource.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5216679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52166792017-01-09 Evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management Mair, Louise Harrison, Philip J. Jönsson, Mari Löbel, Swantje Nordén, Jenni Siitonen, Juha Lämås, Tomas Lundström, Anders Snäll, Tord Ecol Evol Original Research The extensive spatial and temporal coverage of many citizen science datasets (CSD) makes them appealing for use in species distribution modeling and forecasting. However, a frequent limitation is the inability to validate results. Here, we aim to assess the reliability of CSD for forecasting species occurrence in response to national forest management projections (representing 160,366 km(2)) by comparison against forecasts from a model based on systematically collected colonization–extinction data. We fitted species distribution models using citizen science observations of an old‐forest indicator fungus Phellinus ferrugineofuscus. We applied five modeling approaches (generalized linear model, Poisson process model, Bayesian occupancy model, and two MaxEnt models). Models were used to forecast changes in occurrence in response to national forest management for 2020‐2110. Forecasts of species occurrence from models based on CSD were congruent with forecasts made using the colonization–extinction model based on systematically collected data, although different modeling methods indicated different levels of change. All models projected increased occurrence in set‐aside forest from 2020 to 2110: the projected increase varied between 125% and 195% among models based on CSD, in comparison with an increase of 129% according to the colonization–extinction model. All but one model based on CSD projected a decline in production forest, which varied between 11% and 49%, compared to a decline of 41% using the colonization–extinction model. All models thus highlighted the importance of protected old forest for P. ferrugineofuscus persistence. We conclude that models based on CSD can reproduce forecasts from models based on systematically collected colonization–extinction data and so lead to the same forest management conclusions. Our results show that the use of a suite of models allows CSD to be reliably applied to land management and conservation decision making, demonstrating that widely available CSD can be a valuable forecasting resource. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5216679/ /pubmed/28070299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2601 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mair, Louise
Harrison, Philip J.
Jönsson, Mari
Löbel, Swantje
Nordén, Jenni
Siitonen, Juha
Lämås, Tomas
Lundström, Anders
Snäll, Tord
Evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management
title Evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management
title_full Evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management
title_fullStr Evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management
title_short Evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management
title_sort evaluating citizen science data for forecasting species responses to national forest management
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28070299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2601
work_keys_str_mv AT mairlouise evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement
AT harrisonphilipj evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement
AT jonssonmari evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement
AT lobelswantje evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement
AT nordenjenni evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement
AT siitonenjuha evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement
AT lamastomas evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement
AT lundstromanders evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement
AT snalltord evaluatingcitizensciencedataforforecastingspeciesresponsestonationalforestmanagement