Cargando…

Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the inter-fractional motion of cervical spine in radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven localized head and neck cancer patients who were treated from April 2014 to September 2015 were evaluated. Every patient underwent 3 times of computed tomo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Eun-Tae, Park, Sung Kwang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27259242
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9748
_version_ 1782491991734484992
author Park, Eun-Tae
Park, Sung Kwang
author_facet Park, Eun-Tae
Park, Sung Kwang
author_sort Park, Eun-Tae
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the inter-fractional motion of cervical spine in radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven localized head and neck cancer patients who were treated from April 2014 to September 2015 were evaluated. Every patient underwent 3 times of computed tomography (CT) simulation with equivalent setting. Left-right (LR, x) and antero-posterior (AP, z) directional shift of cervical spine were evaluated using 33 number of CT image. In regard to random error, geometric changes were evaluated by 22 data set (compared the first obtained CT to second or third CT) by one-sample T test. Systemic error was evaluated by each patients’ data set (11 pairs) by paired T test. RESULTS: The mean random error of LR and AP translational shift of cervical spine were −0.39 ± 3.24 mm and −0.57 ± 0.99 mm respectively. The mean random error of translational change of AP direction showed statistical significance (p = 0.014). The mean random error of x and z rotational shift were −0.07 ± 0.29° and −0.05 ± 0.35°, respectively. The mean systemic error of translational shift of LR and AP direction were −0.64 ± 2.57 mm and −0.33 ± 1.22 mm, respectively. The mean systemic error of rotational shift of x and z were 0.01 ± 0.18° and −0.27 ± 0.33°, respectively. The mean systemic error of rotational changes of z direction showed statistical difference (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: We have to be aware of the inter-fractional motion of cervical spine in head and neck RT and give enough margins in RT planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5216827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52168272017-01-15 Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy Park, Eun-Tae Park, Sung Kwang Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the inter-fractional motion of cervical spine in radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven localized head and neck cancer patients who were treated from April 2014 to September 2015 were evaluated. Every patient underwent 3 times of computed tomography (CT) simulation with equivalent setting. Left-right (LR, x) and antero-posterior (AP, z) directional shift of cervical spine were evaluated using 33 number of CT image. In regard to random error, geometric changes were evaluated by 22 data set (compared the first obtained CT to second or third CT) by one-sample T test. Systemic error was evaluated by each patients’ data set (11 pairs) by paired T test. RESULTS: The mean random error of LR and AP translational shift of cervical spine were −0.39 ± 3.24 mm and −0.57 ± 0.99 mm respectively. The mean random error of translational change of AP direction showed statistical significance (p = 0.014). The mean random error of x and z rotational shift were −0.07 ± 0.29° and −0.05 ± 0.35°, respectively. The mean systemic error of translational shift of LR and AP direction were −0.64 ± 2.57 mm and −0.33 ± 1.22 mm, respectively. The mean systemic error of rotational shift of x and z were 0.01 ± 0.18° and −0.27 ± 0.33°, respectively. The mean systemic error of rotational changes of z direction showed statistical difference (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: We have to be aware of the inter-fractional motion of cervical spine in head and neck RT and give enough margins in RT planning. Impact Journals LLC 2016-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5216827/ /pubmed/27259242 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9748 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Park and Park http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Park, Eun-Tae
Park, Sung Kwang
Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy
title Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy
title_full Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy
title_fullStr Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy
title_short Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy
title_sort setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5216827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27259242
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9748
work_keys_str_mv AT parkeuntae setupuncertaintiesforinterfractionalheadandneckcancerinradiotherapy
AT parksungkwang setupuncertaintiesforinterfractionalheadandneckcancerinradiotherapy