Cargando…
Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI
PURPOSE: To propose a method for calibrating gradient systems and correcting gradient nonlinearities based on diffusion MRI measurements. METHODS: The gradient scaling in x, y, and z were first offset by up to 5% from precalibrated values to simulate a poorly calibrated system. Diffusion MRI data we...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26105 |
_version_ | 1782492036102881280 |
---|---|
author | Teh, Irvin Maguire, Mahon L. Schneider, Jürgen E. |
author_facet | Teh, Irvin Maguire, Mahon L. Schneider, Jürgen E. |
author_sort | Teh, Irvin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To propose a method for calibrating gradient systems and correcting gradient nonlinearities based on diffusion MRI measurements. METHODS: The gradient scaling in x, y, and z were first offset by up to 5% from precalibrated values to simulate a poorly calibrated system. Diffusion MRI data were acquired in a phantom filled with cyclooctane, and corrections for gradient scaling errors and nonlinearity were determined. The calibration was assessed with diffusion tensor imaging and independently validated with high resolution anatomical MRI of a second structured phantom. RESULTS: The errors in apparent diffusion coefficients along orthogonal axes ranged from −9.2% ± 0.4% to + 8.8% ± 0.7% before calibration and −0.5% ± 0.4% to + 0.8% ± 0.3% after calibration. Concurrently, fractional anisotropy decreased from 0.14 ± 0.03 to 0.03 ± 0.01. Errors in geometric measurements in x, y and z ranged from −5.5% to + 4.5% precalibration and were likewise reduced to −0.97% to + 0.23% postcalibration. Image distortions from gradient nonlinearity were markedly reduced. CONCLUSION: Periodic gradient calibration is an integral part of quality assurance in MRI. The proposed approach is both accurate and efficient, can be setup with readily available materials, and improves accuracy in both anatomical and diffusion MRI to within ±1%. Magn Reson Med 77:170–179, 2017. © 2016 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5217059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52170592017-01-25 Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI Teh, Irvin Maguire, Mahon L. Schneider, Jürgen E. Magn Reson Med Imaging Methodology—Full Papers PURPOSE: To propose a method for calibrating gradient systems and correcting gradient nonlinearities based on diffusion MRI measurements. METHODS: The gradient scaling in x, y, and z were first offset by up to 5% from precalibrated values to simulate a poorly calibrated system. Diffusion MRI data were acquired in a phantom filled with cyclooctane, and corrections for gradient scaling errors and nonlinearity were determined. The calibration was assessed with diffusion tensor imaging and independently validated with high resolution anatomical MRI of a second structured phantom. RESULTS: The errors in apparent diffusion coefficients along orthogonal axes ranged from −9.2% ± 0.4% to + 8.8% ± 0.7% before calibration and −0.5% ± 0.4% to + 0.8% ± 0.3% after calibration. Concurrently, fractional anisotropy decreased from 0.14 ± 0.03 to 0.03 ± 0.01. Errors in geometric measurements in x, y and z ranged from −5.5% to + 4.5% precalibration and were likewise reduced to −0.97% to + 0.23% postcalibration. Image distortions from gradient nonlinearity were markedly reduced. CONCLUSION: Periodic gradient calibration is an integral part of quality assurance in MRI. The proposed approach is both accurate and efficient, can be setup with readily available materials, and improves accuracy in both anatomical and diffusion MRI to within ±1%. Magn Reson Med 77:170–179, 2017. © 2016 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-08 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5217059/ /pubmed/26749277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26105 Text en © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Imaging Methodology—Full Papers Teh, Irvin Maguire, Mahon L. Schneider, Jürgen E. Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI |
title | Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI |
title_full | Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI |
title_fullStr | Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI |
title_short | Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI |
title_sort | efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion mri |
topic | Imaging Methodology—Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tehirvin efficientgradientcalibrationbasedondiffusionmri AT maguiremahonl efficientgradientcalibrationbasedondiffusionmri AT schneiderjurgene efficientgradientcalibrationbasedondiffusionmri |