Cargando…

Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI

PURPOSE: To propose a method for calibrating gradient systems and correcting gradient nonlinearities based on diffusion MRI measurements. METHODS: The gradient scaling in x, y, and z were first offset by up to 5% from precalibrated values to simulate a poorly calibrated system. Diffusion MRI data we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teh, Irvin, Maguire, Mahon L., Schneider, Jürgen E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26105
_version_ 1782492036102881280
author Teh, Irvin
Maguire, Mahon L.
Schneider, Jürgen E.
author_facet Teh, Irvin
Maguire, Mahon L.
Schneider, Jürgen E.
author_sort Teh, Irvin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To propose a method for calibrating gradient systems and correcting gradient nonlinearities based on diffusion MRI measurements. METHODS: The gradient scaling in x, y, and z were first offset by up to 5% from precalibrated values to simulate a poorly calibrated system. Diffusion MRI data were acquired in a phantom filled with cyclooctane, and corrections for gradient scaling errors and nonlinearity were determined. The calibration was assessed with diffusion tensor imaging and independently validated with high resolution anatomical MRI of a second structured phantom. RESULTS: The errors in apparent diffusion coefficients along orthogonal axes ranged from −9.2% ± 0.4% to + 8.8% ± 0.7% before calibration and −0.5% ± 0.4% to + 0.8% ± 0.3% after calibration. Concurrently, fractional anisotropy decreased from 0.14 ± 0.03 to 0.03 ± 0.01. Errors in geometric measurements in x, y and z ranged from −5.5% to + 4.5% precalibration and were likewise reduced to −0.97% to + 0.23% postcalibration. Image distortions from gradient nonlinearity were markedly reduced. CONCLUSION: Periodic gradient calibration is an integral part of quality assurance in MRI. The proposed approach is both accurate and efficient, can be setup with readily available materials, and improves accuracy in both anatomical and diffusion MRI to within ±1%. Magn Reson Med 77:170–179, 2017. © 2016 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5217059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52170592017-01-25 Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI Teh, Irvin Maguire, Mahon L. Schneider, Jürgen E. Magn Reson Med Imaging Methodology—Full Papers PURPOSE: To propose a method for calibrating gradient systems and correcting gradient nonlinearities based on diffusion MRI measurements. METHODS: The gradient scaling in x, y, and z were first offset by up to 5% from precalibrated values to simulate a poorly calibrated system. Diffusion MRI data were acquired in a phantom filled with cyclooctane, and corrections for gradient scaling errors and nonlinearity were determined. The calibration was assessed with diffusion tensor imaging and independently validated with high resolution anatomical MRI of a second structured phantom. RESULTS: The errors in apparent diffusion coefficients along orthogonal axes ranged from −9.2% ± 0.4% to + 8.8% ± 0.7% before calibration and −0.5% ± 0.4% to + 0.8% ± 0.3% after calibration. Concurrently, fractional anisotropy decreased from 0.14 ± 0.03 to 0.03 ± 0.01. Errors in geometric measurements in x, y and z ranged from −5.5% to + 4.5% precalibration and were likewise reduced to −0.97% to + 0.23% postcalibration. Image distortions from gradient nonlinearity were markedly reduced. CONCLUSION: Periodic gradient calibration is an integral part of quality assurance in MRI. The proposed approach is both accurate and efficient, can be setup with readily available materials, and improves accuracy in both anatomical and diffusion MRI to within ±1%. Magn Reson Med 77:170–179, 2017. © 2016 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-08 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5217059/ /pubmed/26749277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26105 Text en © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Imaging Methodology—Full Papers
Teh, Irvin
Maguire, Mahon L.
Schneider, Jürgen E.
Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI
title Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI
title_full Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI
title_fullStr Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI
title_full_unstemmed Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI
title_short Efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion MRI
title_sort efficient gradient calibration based on diffusion mri
topic Imaging Methodology—Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26105
work_keys_str_mv AT tehirvin efficientgradientcalibrationbasedondiffusionmri
AT maguiremahonl efficientgradientcalibrationbasedondiffusionmri
AT schneiderjurgene efficientgradientcalibrationbasedondiffusionmri