Cargando…
Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair‐wise meta‐analysis
This paper investigates how inconsistency (as measured by the I(2) statistic) among studies in a meta‐analysis may differ, according to the type of outcome data and effect measure. We used hierarchical models to analyse data from 3873 binary, 5132 continuous and 880 mixed outcome meta‐analyses withi...
Autores principales: | Rhodes, Kirsty M., Turner, Rebecca M., Higgins, Julian P. T. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26679486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1193 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects
por: Law, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform network meta‐analyses with random inconsistency effects
por: Jackson, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression‡
por: White, Ian R, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta‐analysis using meta‐regression and pseudo data
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)