Cargando…

Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation

Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) is a magnetic resonance imaging biomarker that is used to differentiate progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme, the most common primary brain tumor. However, calculated rCBV depends considerably on the software used. Automati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korfiatis, Panagiotis, Kline, Timothy L., Kelm, Zachary S., Carter, Rickey E., Hu, Leland S., Erickson, Bradley J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Grapho Publications, LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066810
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00172
_version_ 1782492057682575360
author Korfiatis, Panagiotis
Kline, Timothy L.
Kelm, Zachary S.
Carter, Rickey E.
Hu, Leland S.
Erickson, Bradley J.
author_facet Korfiatis, Panagiotis
Kline, Timothy L.
Kelm, Zachary S.
Carter, Rickey E.
Hu, Leland S.
Erickson, Bradley J.
author_sort Korfiatis, Panagiotis
collection PubMed
description Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) is a magnetic resonance imaging biomarker that is used to differentiate progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme, the most common primary brain tumor. However, calculated rCBV depends considerably on the software used. Automating all steps required for rCBV calculation is important, as user interaction can lead to increased variability and possible inaccuracies in clinical decision-making. Here, we present an automated tool for computing rCBV from dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging that includes leakage correction. The entrance and exit bolus time points are automatically calculated using wavelet-based detection. The proposed tool is compared with 3 Food and Drug Administration-approved software packages, 1 automatic and 2 requiring user interaction, on a data set of 43 patients. We also evaluate manual and automated white matter (WM) selection for normalization of the cerebral blood volume maps. Our system showed good agreement with 2 of the 3 software packages. The intraclass correlation coefficient for all comparisons between the same software operated by different people was >0.880, except for FuncTool when operated by user 1 versus user 2. Little variability in agreement between software tools was observed when using different WM selection techniques. Our algorithm for automatic rCBV calculation with leakage correction and automated WM selection agrees well with 2 out of the 3 FDA-approved software packages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5217187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Grapho Publications, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52171872017-01-06 Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation Korfiatis, Panagiotis Kline, Timothy L. Kelm, Zachary S. Carter, Rickey E. Hu, Leland S. Erickson, Bradley J. Tomography Research Articles Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) is a magnetic resonance imaging biomarker that is used to differentiate progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme, the most common primary brain tumor. However, calculated rCBV depends considerably on the software used. Automating all steps required for rCBV calculation is important, as user interaction can lead to increased variability and possible inaccuracies in clinical decision-making. Here, we present an automated tool for computing rCBV from dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging that includes leakage correction. The entrance and exit bolus time points are automatically calculated using wavelet-based detection. The proposed tool is compared with 3 Food and Drug Administration-approved software packages, 1 automatic and 2 requiring user interaction, on a data set of 43 patients. We also evaluate manual and automated white matter (WM) selection for normalization of the cerebral blood volume maps. Our system showed good agreement with 2 of the 3 software packages. The intraclass correlation coefficient for all comparisons between the same software operated by different people was >0.880, except for FuncTool when operated by user 1 versus user 2. Little variability in agreement between software tools was observed when using different WM selection techniques. Our algorithm for automatic rCBV calculation with leakage correction and automated WM selection agrees well with 2 out of the 3 FDA-approved software packages. Grapho Publications, LLC 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5217187/ /pubmed/28066810 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00172 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Korfiatis, Panagiotis
Kline, Timothy L.
Kelm, Zachary S.
Carter, Rickey E.
Hu, Leland S.
Erickson, Bradley J.
Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation
title Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation
title_full Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation
title_fullStr Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation
title_short Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation
title_sort dynamic susceptibility contrast-mri quantification software tool: development and evaluation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066810
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00172
work_keys_str_mv AT korfiatispanagiotis dynamicsusceptibilitycontrastmriquantificationsoftwaretooldevelopmentandevaluation
AT klinetimothyl dynamicsusceptibilitycontrastmriquantificationsoftwaretooldevelopmentandevaluation
AT kelmzacharys dynamicsusceptibilitycontrastmriquantificationsoftwaretooldevelopmentandevaluation
AT carterrickeye dynamicsusceptibilitycontrastmriquantificationsoftwaretooldevelopmentandevaluation
AT hulelands dynamicsusceptibilitycontrastmriquantificationsoftwaretooldevelopmentandevaluation
AT ericksonbradleyj dynamicsusceptibilitycontrastmriquantificationsoftwaretooldevelopmentandevaluation