Cargando…
Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models
BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models (CPMs) are increasingly deployed to support healthcare decisions but they are derived inconsistently, in part due to limited data. An emerging alternative is to aggregate existing CPMs developed for similar settings and outcomes. This simulation study aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0277-1 |
_version_ | 1782492085085011968 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Glen P. Mamas, Mamas A. Peek, Niels Buchan, Iain Sperrin, Matthew |
author_facet | Martin, Glen P. Mamas, Mamas A. Peek, Niels Buchan, Iain Sperrin, Matthew |
author_sort | Martin, Glen P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models (CPMs) are increasingly deployed to support healthcare decisions but they are derived inconsistently, in part due to limited data. An emerging alternative is to aggregate existing CPMs developed for similar settings and outcomes. This simulation study aimed to investigate the impact of between-population-heterogeneity and sample size on aggregating existing CPMs in a defined population, compared with developing a model de novo. METHODS: Simulations were designed to mimic a scenario in which multiple CPMs for a binary outcome had been derived in distinct, heterogeneous populations, with potentially different predictors available in each. We then generated a new ‘local’ population and compared the performance of CPMs developed for this population by aggregation, using stacked regression, principal component analysis or partial least squares, with redevelopment from scratch using backwards selection and penalised regression. RESULTS: While redevelopment approaches resulted in models that were miscalibrated for local datasets of less than 500 observations, model aggregation methods were well calibrated across all simulation scenarios. When the size of local data was less than 1000 observations and between-population-heterogeneity was small, aggregating existing CPMs gave better discrimination and had the lowest mean square error in the predicted risks compared with deriving a new model. Conversely, given greater than 1000 observations and significant between-population-heterogeneity, then redevelopment outperformed the aggregation approaches. In all other scenarios, both aggregation and de novo derivation resulted in similar predictive performance. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a pragmatic approach to contextualising CPMs to defined populations. When aiming to develop models in defined populations, modellers should consider existing CPMs, with aggregation approaches being a suitable modelling strategy particularly with sparse data on the local population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0277-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5217317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52173172017-01-09 Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models Martin, Glen P. Mamas, Mamas A. Peek, Niels Buchan, Iain Sperrin, Matthew BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models (CPMs) are increasingly deployed to support healthcare decisions but they are derived inconsistently, in part due to limited data. An emerging alternative is to aggregate existing CPMs developed for similar settings and outcomes. This simulation study aimed to investigate the impact of between-population-heterogeneity and sample size on aggregating existing CPMs in a defined population, compared with developing a model de novo. METHODS: Simulations were designed to mimic a scenario in which multiple CPMs for a binary outcome had been derived in distinct, heterogeneous populations, with potentially different predictors available in each. We then generated a new ‘local’ population and compared the performance of CPMs developed for this population by aggregation, using stacked regression, principal component analysis or partial least squares, with redevelopment from scratch using backwards selection and penalised regression. RESULTS: While redevelopment approaches resulted in models that were miscalibrated for local datasets of less than 500 observations, model aggregation methods were well calibrated across all simulation scenarios. When the size of local data was less than 1000 observations and between-population-heterogeneity was small, aggregating existing CPMs gave better discrimination and had the lowest mean square error in the predicted risks compared with deriving a new model. Conversely, given greater than 1000 observations and significant between-population-heterogeneity, then redevelopment outperformed the aggregation approaches. In all other scenarios, both aggregation and de novo derivation resulted in similar predictive performance. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a pragmatic approach to contextualising CPMs to defined populations. When aiming to develop models in defined populations, modellers should consider existing CPMs, with aggregation approaches being a suitable modelling strategy particularly with sparse data on the local population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0277-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5217317/ /pubmed/28056835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0277-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Martin, Glen P. Mamas, Mamas A. Peek, Niels Buchan, Iain Sperrin, Matthew Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models |
title | Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models |
title_full | Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models |
title_fullStr | Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models |
title_short | Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models |
title_sort | clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0277-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinglenp clinicalpredictionindefinedpopulationsasimulationstudyinvestigatingwhenandhowtoaggregateexistingmodels AT mamasmamasa clinicalpredictionindefinedpopulationsasimulationstudyinvestigatingwhenandhowtoaggregateexistingmodels AT peekniels clinicalpredictionindefinedpopulationsasimulationstudyinvestigatingwhenandhowtoaggregateexistingmodels AT buchaniain clinicalpredictionindefinedpopulationsasimulationstudyinvestigatingwhenandhowtoaggregateexistingmodels AT sperrinmatthew clinicalpredictionindefinedpopulationsasimulationstudyinvestigatingwhenandhowtoaggregateexistingmodels |