Cargando…

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Up-to-date, high quality, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that are applicable for primary healthcare are vital to optimize services for the population with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP). The study aimed to systematically identify and appraise the available eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ernstzen, Dawn V., Louw, Quinette A., Hillier, Susan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0533-0
_version_ 1782492129606500352
author Ernstzen, Dawn V.
Louw, Quinette A.
Hillier, Susan L.
author_facet Ernstzen, Dawn V.
Louw, Quinette A.
Hillier, Susan L.
author_sort Ernstzen, Dawn V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Up-to-date, high quality, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that are applicable for primary healthcare are vital to optimize services for the population with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP). The study aimed to systematically identify and appraise the available evidence-based CPGs for the management of CMSP in adults presenting in primary healthcare settings. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Twelve guideline clearinghouses and six electronic databases were searched for eligible CPGs published between the years 2000 and May 2015. CPGs meeting the inclusion criteria were appraised by three reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. RESULTS: Of the 1082 records identified, 34 were eligible, and 12 CPGs were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological rigor of CPG development was highly variable, and the median domain score was 66%. The median score for stakeholder involvement was 64%. The lowest median score was obtained for the domain applicability (48%). There was inconsistent use of frameworks to aggregate the level of evidence and the strength of the recommendation in the included CPGs. The scope and content of the included CPGs focussed on opioid prescription. CONCLUSION: Numerous CPGs that are applicable for the primary healthcare of CMSP exists, varying in their scope and methodological quality. This study highlights specific elements to enhance the development and reporting of CPGs, which may play a role in the uptake of guidelines into clinical practice. These elements include enhanced reporting of methodological aspects, the use of frameworks to enhance decision making processes, the inclusion of patient preferences and values, and the consideration of factors influencing applicability of recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015022098. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0533-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5217556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52175562017-01-09 Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review Ernstzen, Dawn V. Louw, Quinette A. Hillier, Susan L. Implement Sci Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Up-to-date, high quality, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that are applicable for primary healthcare are vital to optimize services for the population with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP). The study aimed to systematically identify and appraise the available evidence-based CPGs for the management of CMSP in adults presenting in primary healthcare settings. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Twelve guideline clearinghouses and six electronic databases were searched for eligible CPGs published between the years 2000 and May 2015. CPGs meeting the inclusion criteria were appraised by three reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. RESULTS: Of the 1082 records identified, 34 were eligible, and 12 CPGs were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological rigor of CPG development was highly variable, and the median domain score was 66%. The median score for stakeholder involvement was 64%. The lowest median score was obtained for the domain applicability (48%). There was inconsistent use of frameworks to aggregate the level of evidence and the strength of the recommendation in the included CPGs. The scope and content of the included CPGs focussed on opioid prescription. CONCLUSION: Numerous CPGs that are applicable for the primary healthcare of CMSP exists, varying in their scope and methodological quality. This study highlights specific elements to enhance the development and reporting of CPGs, which may play a role in the uptake of guidelines into clinical practice. These elements include enhanced reporting of methodological aspects, the use of frameworks to enhance decision making processes, the inclusion of patient preferences and values, and the consideration of factors influencing applicability of recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015022098. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0533-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5217556/ /pubmed/28057027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0533-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ernstzen, Dawn V.
Louw, Quinette A.
Hillier, Susan L.
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review
title Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review
title_full Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review
title_short Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review
title_sort clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0533-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ernstzendawnv clinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofchronicmusculoskeletalpaininprimaryhealthcareasystematicreview
AT louwquinettea clinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofchronicmusculoskeletalpaininprimaryhealthcareasystematicreview
AT hilliersusanl clinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofchronicmusculoskeletalpaininprimaryhealthcareasystematicreview