Cargando…

Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine kinases promote tumor progression in many cancers, although oncologic activation differs between diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) and intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is one RTK, and we previously reported the clinical sign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inokuchi, Mikito, Murase, Hideaki, Otsuki, Sho, Kawano, Tatsuyuki, Kojima, Kazuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1081-4
_version_ 1782492144201629696
author Inokuchi, Mikito
Murase, Hideaki
Otsuki, Sho
Kawano, Tatsuyuki
Kojima, Kazuyuki
author_facet Inokuchi, Mikito
Murase, Hideaki
Otsuki, Sho
Kawano, Tatsuyuki
Kojima, Kazuyuki
author_sort Inokuchi, Mikito
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine kinases promote tumor progression in many cancers, although oncologic activation differs between diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) and intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is one RTK, and we previously reported the clinical significance of FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 in gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to reevaluate the clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression separately in DGC and IGC. METHODS: Tumor samples, including 109 DGCs and 100 IGCs, were obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2003 and 2007 in our institution. The expression levels of FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 were measured in the tumors by immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: In DGC, high expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGFR4 was significantly associated with the depth of invasion, lymph-node metastasis, pathological stage, and distant metastasis or recurrent disease. Patients with high expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGFR4 had significantly poorer disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, and p = 0.023, respectively). In IGC, only FGFR4 expression was significantly associated with factors relative to tumor progression and with shorter DSS (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, high FGFR4 expression correlated with tumor progression and survival in both DGC and IGC, whereas high expression of FGFR1 and 2 correlated with tumor progression and survival in only DGC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5217622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52176222017-01-09 Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer Inokuchi, Mikito Murase, Hideaki Otsuki, Sho Kawano, Tatsuyuki Kojima, Kazuyuki World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine kinases promote tumor progression in many cancers, although oncologic activation differs between diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) and intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is one RTK, and we previously reported the clinical significance of FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 in gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to reevaluate the clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression separately in DGC and IGC. METHODS: Tumor samples, including 109 DGCs and 100 IGCs, were obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2003 and 2007 in our institution. The expression levels of FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 were measured in the tumors by immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: In DGC, high expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGFR4 was significantly associated with the depth of invasion, lymph-node metastasis, pathological stage, and distant metastasis or recurrent disease. Patients with high expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGFR4 had significantly poorer disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, and p = 0.023, respectively). In IGC, only FGFR4 expression was significantly associated with factors relative to tumor progression and with shorter DSS (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, high FGFR4 expression correlated with tumor progression and survival in both DGC and IGC, whereas high expression of FGFR1 and 2 correlated with tumor progression and survival in only DGC. BioMed Central 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5217622/ /pubmed/28056982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1081-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Inokuchi, Mikito
Murase, Hideaki
Otsuki, Sho
Kawano, Tatsuyuki
Kojima, Kazuyuki
Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
title Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
title_full Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
title_fullStr Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
title_short Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
title_sort different clinical significance of fgfr1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1081-4
work_keys_str_mv AT inokuchimikito differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer
AT murasehideaki differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer
AT otsukisho differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer
AT kawanotatsuyuki differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer
AT kojimakazuyuki differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer