Cargando…
Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine kinases promote tumor progression in many cancers, although oncologic activation differs between diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) and intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is one RTK, and we previously reported the clinical sign...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1081-4 |
_version_ | 1782492144201629696 |
---|---|
author | Inokuchi, Mikito Murase, Hideaki Otsuki, Sho Kawano, Tatsuyuki Kojima, Kazuyuki |
author_facet | Inokuchi, Mikito Murase, Hideaki Otsuki, Sho Kawano, Tatsuyuki Kojima, Kazuyuki |
author_sort | Inokuchi, Mikito |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine kinases promote tumor progression in many cancers, although oncologic activation differs between diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) and intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is one RTK, and we previously reported the clinical significance of FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 in gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to reevaluate the clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression separately in DGC and IGC. METHODS: Tumor samples, including 109 DGCs and 100 IGCs, were obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2003 and 2007 in our institution. The expression levels of FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 were measured in the tumors by immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: In DGC, high expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGFR4 was significantly associated with the depth of invasion, lymph-node metastasis, pathological stage, and distant metastasis or recurrent disease. Patients with high expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGFR4 had significantly poorer disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, and p = 0.023, respectively). In IGC, only FGFR4 expression was significantly associated with factors relative to tumor progression and with shorter DSS (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, high FGFR4 expression correlated with tumor progression and survival in both DGC and IGC, whereas high expression of FGFR1 and 2 correlated with tumor progression and survival in only DGC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5217622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52176222017-01-09 Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer Inokuchi, Mikito Murase, Hideaki Otsuki, Sho Kawano, Tatsuyuki Kojima, Kazuyuki World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine kinases promote tumor progression in many cancers, although oncologic activation differs between diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) and intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is one RTK, and we previously reported the clinical significance of FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 in gastric cancer. The aim of the present study was to reevaluate the clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression separately in DGC and IGC. METHODS: Tumor samples, including 109 DGCs and 100 IGCs, were obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2003 and 2007 in our institution. The expression levels of FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 were measured in the tumors by immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: In DGC, high expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGFR4 was significantly associated with the depth of invasion, lymph-node metastasis, pathological stage, and distant metastasis or recurrent disease. Patients with high expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGFR4 had significantly poorer disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, and p = 0.023, respectively). In IGC, only FGFR4 expression was significantly associated with factors relative to tumor progression and with shorter DSS (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, high FGFR4 expression correlated with tumor progression and survival in both DGC and IGC, whereas high expression of FGFR1 and 2 correlated with tumor progression and survival in only DGC. BioMed Central 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5217622/ /pubmed/28056982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1081-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Inokuchi, Mikito Murase, Hideaki Otsuki, Sho Kawano, Tatsuyuki Kojima, Kazuyuki Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer |
title | Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer |
title_full | Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer |
title_short | Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer |
title_sort | different clinical significance of fgfr1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1081-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inokuchimikito differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer AT murasehideaki differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer AT otsukisho differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer AT kawanotatsuyuki differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer AT kojimakazuyuki differentclinicalsignificanceoffgfr14expressionbetweendiffusetypeandintestinaltypegastriccancer |