Cargando…

Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND: Vasopressin (AVP) and terlipressin (TP) have been used as last-line therapy in refractory shock in children. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of AVP and TP have not been determined in pediatric refractory shock of different origins. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masarwa, Reem, Paret, Gideon, Perlman, Amichai, Reif, Shimon, Raccah, Bruria Hirsh, Matok, Ilan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1589-6
_version_ 1782492146953093120
author Masarwa, Reem
Paret, Gideon
Perlman, Amichai
Reif, Shimon
Raccah, Bruria Hirsh
Matok, Ilan
author_facet Masarwa, Reem
Paret, Gideon
Perlman, Amichai
Reif, Shimon
Raccah, Bruria Hirsh
Matok, Ilan
author_sort Masarwa, Reem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vasopressin (AVP) and terlipressin (TP) have been used as last-line therapy in refractory shock in children. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of AVP and TP have not been determined in pediatric refractory shock of different origins. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of AVP/TP therapy in pediatric refractory shock of all causes compared to conventional therapy with fluid resuscitation and vasopressor and inotropic therapy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) comparing AVP and TP to conventional therapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to February 2016. The systematic review included all reports of AVP/TP use in the pediatric population. Reports of clinical trials were pooled using random-effects models and TSA. Main outcomes were mortality and tissue ischemia. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials and five “before-and-after clinical” trials (without comparator) met the inclusion criteria. Among 224 neonates and children (aged 0 to 18 years) with refractory shock, 152 received therapy with AVP or TP. Pooled analyses showed no association between AVP/TP treatment and mortality (relative risk (RR),1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–2.00), length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (mean difference (MD), –3.58 days; 95% CI, –9.05 to 1.83), and tissue ischemia (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.47–4.62). In TSA, no significant effect on mortality and risk for developing tissue ischemia was observed with AVP/TP therapy. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the lack of observed benefit for AVP/TP in terms of mortality and length of stay in the PICU, and suggest an increased risk for ischemic events. Our TSA suggests that further large studies are necessary to demonstrate and establish benefits of AVP/TP in children. PROSPERO registry: CRD42016035872 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1589-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5217634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52176342017-01-09 Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis Masarwa, Reem Paret, Gideon Perlman, Amichai Reif, Shimon Raccah, Bruria Hirsh Matok, Ilan Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Vasopressin (AVP) and terlipressin (TP) have been used as last-line therapy in refractory shock in children. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of AVP and TP have not been determined in pediatric refractory shock of different origins. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of AVP/TP therapy in pediatric refractory shock of all causes compared to conventional therapy with fluid resuscitation and vasopressor and inotropic therapy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) comparing AVP and TP to conventional therapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to February 2016. The systematic review included all reports of AVP/TP use in the pediatric population. Reports of clinical trials were pooled using random-effects models and TSA. Main outcomes were mortality and tissue ischemia. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials and five “before-and-after clinical” trials (without comparator) met the inclusion criteria. Among 224 neonates and children (aged 0 to 18 years) with refractory shock, 152 received therapy with AVP or TP. Pooled analyses showed no association between AVP/TP treatment and mortality (relative risk (RR),1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–2.00), length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (mean difference (MD), –3.58 days; 95% CI, –9.05 to 1.83), and tissue ischemia (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.47–4.62). In TSA, no significant effect on mortality and risk for developing tissue ischemia was observed with AVP/TP therapy. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the lack of observed benefit for AVP/TP in terms of mortality and length of stay in the PICU, and suggest an increased risk for ischemic events. Our TSA suggests that further large studies are necessary to demonstrate and establish benefits of AVP/TP in children. PROSPERO registry: CRD42016035872 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1589-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5217634/ /pubmed/28057037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1589-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Masarwa, Reem
Paret, Gideon
Perlman, Amichai
Reif, Shimon
Raccah, Bruria Hirsh
Matok, Ilan
Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_full Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_short Role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_sort role of vasopressin and terlipressin in refractory shock compared to conventional therapy in the neonatal and pediatric population: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28057037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1589-6
work_keys_str_mv AT masarwareem roleofvasopressinandterlipressininrefractoryshockcomparedtoconventionaltherapyintheneonatalandpediatricpopulationasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT paretgideon roleofvasopressinandterlipressininrefractoryshockcomparedtoconventionaltherapyintheneonatalandpediatricpopulationasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT perlmanamichai roleofvasopressinandterlipressininrefractoryshockcomparedtoconventionaltherapyintheneonatalandpediatricpopulationasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT reifshimon roleofvasopressinandterlipressininrefractoryshockcomparedtoconventionaltherapyintheneonatalandpediatricpopulationasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT raccahbruriahirsh roleofvasopressinandterlipressininrefractoryshockcomparedtoconventionaltherapyintheneonatalandpediatricpopulationasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT matokilan roleofvasopressinandterlipressininrefractoryshockcomparedtoconventionaltherapyintheneonatalandpediatricpopulationasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis