Cargando…
Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement
BACKGROUND: Observational studies are the most frequently published studies in literature. When randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted because of ethical or practical considerations, an observational study design is the first choice. The STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBs...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28060869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169316 |
_version_ | 1782492182948610048 |
---|---|
author | Hendriksma, Martine Joosten, Michiel H. M. A. Peters, Jeroen P. M. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge |
author_facet | Hendriksma, Martine Joosten, Michiel H. M. A. Peters, Jeroen P. M. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge |
author_sort | Hendriksma, Martine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Observational studies are the most frequently published studies in literature. When randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted because of ethical or practical considerations, an observational study design is the first choice. The STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) was developed to provide guidance on how to adequately report observational studies. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were 1) to evaluate the quality of reporting of observational studies of otorhinolaryngologic literature using the STROBE Statement checklist, 2) to compare the quality of reporting of observational studies in the top 5 Ear, Nose, Throat (ENT) journals versus the top 5 general medical journals and 3) to formulate recommendations to improve adequate reporting of observational research in otorhinolaryngologic literature. METHODS: The top 5 general medical journals and top 5 otorhinolaryngologic journals were selected based on their ISI Web of Knowledge impact factors. On August 3(rd), 2015, we performed a PubMed search using different filters to retrieve observational articles from these journals. Studies were selected from 2010 to 2014 for the general medical journals and from 2015 for the ENT journals. We assessed all STROBE items to examine how many items were reported adequately for each journal type. RESULTS: The articles in the top 5 general medical journals (n = 11) reported a mean of 69.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 65.8%–72.7%; median 70.6%), whereas the top 5 ENT journals (n = 29) reported a mean of 51.4% (95% CI: 47.7%–55.0%; median 50.0%). The two journal types reported STROBE items significantly different (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Quality of reporting of observational studies in otorhinolaryngologic articles can considerably enhance. The quality of reporting was better in general medical journals compared to ENT journals. To improve the quality of reporting of observational studies, we recommend authors and editors to endorse and actively implement the STROBE Statement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5217955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52179552017-01-19 Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement Hendriksma, Martine Joosten, Michiel H. M. A. Peters, Jeroen P. M. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Observational studies are the most frequently published studies in literature. When randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted because of ethical or practical considerations, an observational study design is the first choice. The STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) was developed to provide guidance on how to adequately report observational studies. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were 1) to evaluate the quality of reporting of observational studies of otorhinolaryngologic literature using the STROBE Statement checklist, 2) to compare the quality of reporting of observational studies in the top 5 Ear, Nose, Throat (ENT) journals versus the top 5 general medical journals and 3) to formulate recommendations to improve adequate reporting of observational research in otorhinolaryngologic literature. METHODS: The top 5 general medical journals and top 5 otorhinolaryngologic journals were selected based on their ISI Web of Knowledge impact factors. On August 3(rd), 2015, we performed a PubMed search using different filters to retrieve observational articles from these journals. Studies were selected from 2010 to 2014 for the general medical journals and from 2015 for the ENT journals. We assessed all STROBE items to examine how many items were reported adequately for each journal type. RESULTS: The articles in the top 5 general medical journals (n = 11) reported a mean of 69.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 65.8%–72.7%; median 70.6%), whereas the top 5 ENT journals (n = 29) reported a mean of 51.4% (95% CI: 47.7%–55.0%; median 50.0%). The two journal types reported STROBE items significantly different (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Quality of reporting of observational studies in otorhinolaryngologic articles can considerably enhance. The quality of reporting was better in general medical journals compared to ENT journals. To improve the quality of reporting of observational studies, we recommend authors and editors to endorse and actively implement the STROBE Statement. Public Library of Science 2017-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5217955/ /pubmed/28060869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169316 Text en © 2017 Hendriksma et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hendriksma, Martine Joosten, Michiel H. M. A. Peters, Jeroen P. M. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement |
title | Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement |
title_full | Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement |
title_short | Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement |
title_sort | evaluation of the quality of reporting of observational studies in otorhinolaryngology - based on the strobe statement |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28060869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendriksmamartine evaluationofthequalityofreportingofobservationalstudiesinotorhinolaryngologybasedonthestrobestatement AT joostenmichielhma evaluationofthequalityofreportingofobservationalstudiesinotorhinolaryngologybasedonthestrobestatement AT petersjeroenpm evaluationofthequalityofreportingofobservationalstudiesinotorhinolaryngologybasedonthestrobestatement AT grolmanwilko evaluationofthequalityofreportingofobservationalstudiesinotorhinolaryngologybasedonthestrobestatement AT stegemaninge evaluationofthequalityofreportingofobservationalstudiesinotorhinolaryngologybasedonthestrobestatement |