Cargando…
Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement
BACKGROUND: Observational studies are the most frequently published studies in literature. When randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted because of ethical or practical considerations, an observational study design is the first choice. The STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBs...
Autores principales: | Hendriksma, Martine, Joosten, Michiel H. M. A., Peters, Jeroen P. M., Grolman, Wilko, Stegeman, Inge |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28060869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169316 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials in Otorhinolaryngologic Literature – Adherence to the CONSORT Statement
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Quality of reporting of otorhinolaryngology articles using animal models with the ARRIVE statement
por: Bezdjian, Aren, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in otorhinolaryngology: hardly any improvement since 1950
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology—Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement
por: Lachat, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2016)