Cargando…

Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education

IMPORTANCE: New dissemination methods are needed to engage physicians in evidence-based continuing medical education (CME). OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of social media in engaging physicians in non-industry-sponsored CME. DESIGN: We tested the effect of different media platforms (e-mail,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flynn, Simone, Hebert, Paul, Korenstein, Deborah, Ryan, Mark, Jordan, William B., Keyhani, Salomeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5218469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28060854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168962
_version_ 1782492286858297344
author Flynn, Simone
Hebert, Paul
Korenstein, Deborah
Ryan, Mark
Jordan, William B.
Keyhani, Salomeh
author_facet Flynn, Simone
Hebert, Paul
Korenstein, Deborah
Ryan, Mark
Jordan, William B.
Keyhani, Salomeh
author_sort Flynn, Simone
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: New dissemination methods are needed to engage physicians in evidence-based continuing medical education (CME). OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of social media in engaging physicians in non-industry-sponsored CME. DESIGN: We tested the effect of different media platforms (e-mail, Facebook, paid Facebook and Twitter), CME topics, and different “hooks” (e.g., Q&A, clinical pearl and best evidence) on driving clicks to a landing site featuring non-industry sponsored CME. We modelled the effects of social media platform, CME topic, and hook using negative binomial regression on clicks to a single landing site. We used clicks to landing site adjusted for exposure and message number to calculate rate ratios. To understand how physicians interact with CME content on social media, we also conducted interviews with 10 physicians. SETTING: The National Physicians Alliance (NPA) membership. PARTICIPANTS: NPA e-mail recipients, Facebook followers and friends, and Twitter followers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clicks to the NPA’s CME landing site. RESULTS: On average, 4,544 recipients received each message. Messages generated a total of 592 clicks to the landing site, for a rate of 5.4 clicks per 1000 recipients exposed. There were 5.4 clicks from e-mail, 11.9 clicks from Facebook, 5.5 clicks from paid Facebook, and 6.9 clicks from Twitter to the landing site for 1000 physicians exposed to each of 4 selected CME modules. A Facebook post generated 2.3x as many clicks to the landing site as did an e-mail after controlling for participant exposure, hook type and CME topic (p<0.001). Twitter posts (p = 0.13) and paid Facebook posts (p = 0.06) were not statistically different from e-mail in generating clicks to the landing site. Use of different hooks to engage physicians had no impact on clicks to the landing site. Interviews with physicians suggested that social media might not be a preferred vehicle for disseminating CME. CONCLUSIONS: Social media has a modest impact on driving traffic to evidence-based CME options. Facebook had a superior effect on driving physician web traffic to evidence-based CME compared to other social media platforms and email.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5218469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52184692017-01-19 Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education Flynn, Simone Hebert, Paul Korenstein, Deborah Ryan, Mark Jordan, William B. Keyhani, Salomeh PLoS One Research Article IMPORTANCE: New dissemination methods are needed to engage physicians in evidence-based continuing medical education (CME). OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of social media in engaging physicians in non-industry-sponsored CME. DESIGN: We tested the effect of different media platforms (e-mail, Facebook, paid Facebook and Twitter), CME topics, and different “hooks” (e.g., Q&A, clinical pearl and best evidence) on driving clicks to a landing site featuring non-industry sponsored CME. We modelled the effects of social media platform, CME topic, and hook using negative binomial regression on clicks to a single landing site. We used clicks to landing site adjusted for exposure and message number to calculate rate ratios. To understand how physicians interact with CME content on social media, we also conducted interviews with 10 physicians. SETTING: The National Physicians Alliance (NPA) membership. PARTICIPANTS: NPA e-mail recipients, Facebook followers and friends, and Twitter followers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clicks to the NPA’s CME landing site. RESULTS: On average, 4,544 recipients received each message. Messages generated a total of 592 clicks to the landing site, for a rate of 5.4 clicks per 1000 recipients exposed. There were 5.4 clicks from e-mail, 11.9 clicks from Facebook, 5.5 clicks from paid Facebook, and 6.9 clicks from Twitter to the landing site for 1000 physicians exposed to each of 4 selected CME modules. A Facebook post generated 2.3x as many clicks to the landing site as did an e-mail after controlling for participant exposure, hook type and CME topic (p<0.001). Twitter posts (p = 0.13) and paid Facebook posts (p = 0.06) were not statistically different from e-mail in generating clicks to the landing site. Use of different hooks to engage physicians had no impact on clicks to the landing site. Interviews with physicians suggested that social media might not be a preferred vehicle for disseminating CME. CONCLUSIONS: Social media has a modest impact on driving traffic to evidence-based CME options. Facebook had a superior effect on driving physician web traffic to evidence-based CME compared to other social media platforms and email. Public Library of Science 2017-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5218469/ /pubmed/28060854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168962 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flynn, Simone
Hebert, Paul
Korenstein, Deborah
Ryan, Mark
Jordan, William B.
Keyhani, Salomeh
Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education
title Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education
title_full Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education
title_fullStr Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education
title_full_unstemmed Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education
title_short Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education
title_sort leveraging social media to promote evidence-based continuing medical education
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5218469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28060854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168962
work_keys_str_mv AT flynnsimone leveragingsocialmediatopromoteevidencebasedcontinuingmedicaleducation
AT hebertpaul leveragingsocialmediatopromoteevidencebasedcontinuingmedicaleducation
AT korensteindeborah leveragingsocialmediatopromoteevidencebasedcontinuingmedicaleducation
AT ryanmark leveragingsocialmediatopromoteevidencebasedcontinuingmedicaleducation
AT jordanwilliamb leveragingsocialmediatopromoteevidencebasedcontinuingmedicaleducation
AT keyhanisalomeh leveragingsocialmediatopromoteevidencebasedcontinuingmedicaleducation