Cargando…

Pilot Study: Estimation of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output from Pulse Wave Velocity

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is increasingly replacing thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters to assess hemodynamics in patients at high risk for cardiovascular morbidity. However, one of the drawbacks of TEE compared to pulmonary artery catheters is the inability to measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obata, Yurie, Mizogami, Maki, Nyhan, Daniel, Berkowitz, Dan E., Steppan, Jochen, Barodka, Viachaslau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5218503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28060961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169853
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is increasingly replacing thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters to assess hemodynamics in patients at high risk for cardiovascular morbidity. However, one of the drawbacks of TEE compared to pulmonary artery catheters is the inability to measure real time stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) continuously. The aim of the present proof of concept study was to validate a novel method of SV estimation, based on pulse wave velocity (PWV) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. We measured pulse transit time by superimposing the radial arterial waveform onto the continuous wave Doppler waveform of the left ventricular outflow tract, and calculated SV (SV(PWV)) using the transformed Bramwell-Hill equation. The SV measured by TEE (SV(TEE)) was used as a reference. RESULTS: A total of 190 paired SV were measured from 28 patients. A strong correlation was observed between SV(PWV) and SV(TEE) with the coefficient of determination (R(2)) of 0.71. A mean difference between the two (bias) was 3.70 ml with the limits of agreement ranging from -20.33 to 27.73 ml and a percentage error of 27.4% based on a Bland-Altman analysis. The concordance rate of two methods was 85.0% based on a four-quadrant plot. The angular concordance rate was 85.9% with radial limits of agreement (the radial sector that contained 95% of the data points) of ± 41.5 degrees based on a polar plot. CONCLUSIONS: PWV based SV estimation yields reasonable agreement with SV measured by TEE. Further studies are required to assess its utility in different clinical situations.