Cargando…

Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on strategies implemented or identified to prevent or reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants. METHODS: Studies of any type of qualitative or quantitative design examining interventions to reduce or prevent gender bias during the peer review of health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Tricco, Andrea C., Thomas, Sonia M., Antony, Jesmin, Rios, Patricia, Robson, Reid, Pattani, Reena, Ghassemi, Marco, Sullivan, Shannon, Selvaratnam, Inthuja, Tannenbaum, Cara, Straus, Sharon E.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5218731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28061509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169718

Ejemplares similares

A scoping review of rapid review methods
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Safety and effectiveness of dose-sparing strategies for intramuscular seasonal influenza vaccine: a rapid scoping review
por: Lunny, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparative-effectiveness research of COVID-19 treatment: a rapid scoping review
por: Pham, Ba, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Transparent Peer Review of Grant Applications
por: Lee, Jung Hun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
por: Antony, Jesmin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Improving Grant Application Peer Review for the NIEHS
por: Schwartz, David A., et al.
Publicado: (2006)

peer review of grant funding – the Australian perspective
por: Cappai, Roberto
Publicado: (2015)

Patient safety initiatives in obstetrics: a rapid review
por: Antony, Jesmin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review
por: Kastner, Monika, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review
por: Zarin, Wasifa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage
por: Langlois, Etienne V, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Erratum to: Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review
por: Zarin, Wasifa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training
por: Sattler, David N., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications
por: Tamblyn, Robyn, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices
por: Abdoul, Hendy, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity
por: Fang, Ferric C, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow
por: Pham, Ba’, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for post-surgery or chemotherapy patients taking serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews
por: Giraudeau, Bruno, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Effectiveness of online learning on health researcher capacity to appropriately integrate sex, gender, or both in grant proposals
por: Tannenbaum, Cara, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
por: Guthrie, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

What makes an effective grants peer reviewer? An exploratory study of the necessary skills
por: Steiner Davis, Miriam L. E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
por: Nakamura, Richard K, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of an institutional grant award on early career investigator applicants and peer reviewers
por: Mughal, Amreen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of complex wound interventions reveals optimal treatments for specific wound types
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Engaging policy-makers, heath system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Teleconference versus Face-to-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Application: Effects on Review Outcomes
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Correction to: Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Exploring the prevalence of gaming disorder and Internet gaming disorder: a rapid scoping review
por: Darvesh, Nazia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions
por: Sato, Sayaka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Utility of social media and crowd-intelligence data for pharmacovigilance: a scoping review
por: Tricco, Andrea C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: an overview of systematic reviews
por: Tricco, Andrea C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

What ails the NIH peer review study sections and how to fix the review process of the grant applications
por: Marian, Ali J.
Publicado: (2023)

Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Schmaling, Karen B., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Gender bias in scholarly peer review
por: Helmer, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
por: Rice, Danielle B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

It's Money! Real-World Grant Experience through a Student-Run, Peer-Reviewed Program
por: Dumanis, Sonya B., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_r6n7s9ig2mgh4eomqqob05ulge