Cargando…

Influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the summed measures of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) spatial distribution and their effects on intraocular scatter using a commercially available device (C-Quant, Oculus, USA). METHODS: A customized heterochromatic flicker photometer (cHFP) device was used to m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putnam, Christopher M., Bland, Pauline J., Bassi, Carl J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5219829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.10.001
_version_ 1782492533617590272
author Putnam, Christopher M.
Bland, Pauline J.
Bassi, Carl J.
author_facet Putnam, Christopher M.
Bland, Pauline J.
Bassi, Carl J.
author_sort Putnam, Christopher M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluated the summed measures of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) spatial distribution and their effects on intraocular scatter using a commercially available device (C-Quant, Oculus, USA). METHODS: A customized heterochromatic flicker photometer (cHFP) device was used to measure MPOD spatial distribution across the central 16° using a 1° stimulus. MPOD was calculated as a discrete measure and summed measures across the central 1°, 3.3°, 10° and 16° diameters. Intraocular scatter was determined as a mean of 5 trials in which reliability and repeatability measures were met using the C-Quant. MPOD spatial distribution maps were constructed and the effects of both discrete and summed values on intraocular scatter were examined. RESULTS: Spatial mapping identified mean values for discrete MPOD [0.32 (s.d. = 0.08)], MPOD summed across central 1° [0.37 (s.d. = 0.11)], MPOD summed across central 3.3° [0.85 (s.d. = 0.20)], MPOD summed across central 10° [1.60 (s.d. = 0.35)] and MPOD summed across central 16° [1.78 (s.d. = 0.39)]. Mean intraocular scatter was 0.83 (s.d. = 0.16) log units. While there were consistent trends for an inverse relationship between MPOD and scatter, these relationships were not statistically significant. Correlations between the highest and lowest quartiles of MPOD within the central 1° were near significance. CONCLUSIONS: While there was an overall trend of decreased intraocular forward scatter with increased MPOD consistent with selective short wavelength visible light attenuation, neither discrete nor summed values of MPOD significantly influence intraocular scatter as measured by the C-Quant device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5219829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52198292017-01-18 Influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter Putnam, Christopher M. Bland, Pauline J. Bassi, Carl J. J Optom Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated the summed measures of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) spatial distribution and their effects on intraocular scatter using a commercially available device (C-Quant, Oculus, USA). METHODS: A customized heterochromatic flicker photometer (cHFP) device was used to measure MPOD spatial distribution across the central 16° using a 1° stimulus. MPOD was calculated as a discrete measure and summed measures across the central 1°, 3.3°, 10° and 16° diameters. Intraocular scatter was determined as a mean of 5 trials in which reliability and repeatability measures were met using the C-Quant. MPOD spatial distribution maps were constructed and the effects of both discrete and summed values on intraocular scatter were examined. RESULTS: Spatial mapping identified mean values for discrete MPOD [0.32 (s.d. = 0.08)], MPOD summed across central 1° [0.37 (s.d. = 0.11)], MPOD summed across central 3.3° [0.85 (s.d. = 0.20)], MPOD summed across central 10° [1.60 (s.d. = 0.35)] and MPOD summed across central 16° [1.78 (s.d. = 0.39)]. Mean intraocular scatter was 0.83 (s.d. = 0.16) log units. While there were consistent trends for an inverse relationship between MPOD and scatter, these relationships were not statistically significant. Correlations between the highest and lowest quartiles of MPOD within the central 1° were near significance. CONCLUSIONS: While there was an overall trend of decreased intraocular forward scatter with increased MPOD consistent with selective short wavelength visible light attenuation, neither discrete nor summed values of MPOD significantly influence intraocular scatter as measured by the C-Quant device. Elsevier 2017 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5219829/ /pubmed/26621117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.10.001 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Putnam, Christopher M.
Bland, Pauline J.
Bassi, Carl J.
Influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter
title Influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter
title_full Influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter
title_fullStr Influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter
title_full_unstemmed Influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter
title_short Influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter
title_sort influence of macular pigment optical density spatial distribution on intraocular scatter
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5219829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT putnamchristopherm influenceofmacularpigmentopticaldensityspatialdistributiononintraocularscatter
AT blandpaulinej influenceofmacularpigmentopticaldensityspatialdistributiononintraocularscatter
AT bassicarlj influenceofmacularpigmentopticaldensityspatialdistributiononintraocularscatter