Cargando…

Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system

PURPOSE: To conduct a clinical validation of a virtual reality-based experimental system that is able to assess the spherical subjective refraction simplifying the methodology of ocular refraction. METHODS: For the agreement assessment, spherical refraction measurements were obtained from 104 eyes o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pujol, Jaume, Ondategui-Parra, Juan Carlos, Badiella, Llorenç, Otero, Carles, Vilaseca, Meritxell, Aldaba, Mikel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5219830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26856962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.12.005
_version_ 1782492533858762752
author Pujol, Jaume
Ondategui-Parra, Juan Carlos
Badiella, Llorenç
Otero, Carles
Vilaseca, Meritxell
Aldaba, Mikel
author_facet Pujol, Jaume
Ondategui-Parra, Juan Carlos
Badiella, Llorenç
Otero, Carles
Vilaseca, Meritxell
Aldaba, Mikel
author_sort Pujol, Jaume
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To conduct a clinical validation of a virtual reality-based experimental system that is able to assess the spherical subjective refraction simplifying the methodology of ocular refraction. METHODS: For the agreement assessment, spherical refraction measurements were obtained from 104 eyes of 52 subjects using three different methods: subjectively with the experimental prototype (Subj.E) and the classical subjective refraction (Subj.C); and objectively with the WAM-5500 autorefractor (WAM). To evaluate precision (intra- and inter-observer variability) of each refractive tool independently, 26 eyes were measured in four occasions. RESULTS: With regard to agreement, the mean difference (±SD) for the spherical equivalent (M) between the new experimental subjective method (Subj.E) and the classical subjective refraction (Subj.C) was −0.034 D (±0.454 D). The corresponding 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) were (−0.856 D, 0.924 D). In relation to precision, intra-observer mean difference for the M component was 0.034 ± 0.195 D for the Subj.C, 0.015 ± 0.177 D for the WAM and 0.072 ± 0.197 D for the Subj.E. Inter-observer variability showed worse precision values, although still clinically valid (below 0.25 D) in all instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The spherical equivalent obtained with the new experimental system was precise and in good agreement with the classical subjective routine. The algorithm implemented in this new system and its optical configuration has been shown to be a first valid step for spherical error correction in a semiautomated way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5219830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52198302017-01-18 Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system Pujol, Jaume Ondategui-Parra, Juan Carlos Badiella, Llorenç Otero, Carles Vilaseca, Meritxell Aldaba, Mikel J Optom Original Article PURPOSE: To conduct a clinical validation of a virtual reality-based experimental system that is able to assess the spherical subjective refraction simplifying the methodology of ocular refraction. METHODS: For the agreement assessment, spherical refraction measurements were obtained from 104 eyes of 52 subjects using three different methods: subjectively with the experimental prototype (Subj.E) and the classical subjective refraction (Subj.C); and objectively with the WAM-5500 autorefractor (WAM). To evaluate precision (intra- and inter-observer variability) of each refractive tool independently, 26 eyes were measured in four occasions. RESULTS: With regard to agreement, the mean difference (±SD) for the spherical equivalent (M) between the new experimental subjective method (Subj.E) and the classical subjective refraction (Subj.C) was −0.034 D (±0.454 D). The corresponding 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) were (−0.856 D, 0.924 D). In relation to precision, intra-observer mean difference for the M component was 0.034 ± 0.195 D for the Subj.C, 0.015 ± 0.177 D for the WAM and 0.072 ± 0.197 D for the Subj.E. Inter-observer variability showed worse precision values, although still clinically valid (below 0.25 D) in all instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The spherical equivalent obtained with the new experimental system was precise and in good agreement with the classical subjective routine. The algorithm implemented in this new system and its optical configuration has been shown to be a first valid step for spherical error correction in a semiautomated way. Elsevier 2017 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5219830/ /pubmed/26856962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.12.005 Text en © 2016 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espa˜na, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Pujol, Jaume
Ondategui-Parra, Juan Carlos
Badiella, Llorenç
Otero, Carles
Vilaseca, Meritxell
Aldaba, Mikel
Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system
title Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system
title_full Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system
title_fullStr Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system
title_full_unstemmed Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system
title_short Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system
title_sort spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3d virtual reality based system
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5219830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26856962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2015.12.005
work_keys_str_mv AT pujoljaume sphericalsubjectiverefractionwithanovel3dvirtualrealitybasedsystem
AT ondateguiparrajuancarlos sphericalsubjectiverefractionwithanovel3dvirtualrealitybasedsystem
AT badiellallorenc sphericalsubjectiverefractionwithanovel3dvirtualrealitybasedsystem
AT oterocarles sphericalsubjectiverefractionwithanovel3dvirtualrealitybasedsystem
AT vilasecameritxell sphericalsubjectiverefractionwithanovel3dvirtualrealitybasedsystem
AT aldabamikel sphericalsubjectiverefractionwithanovel3dvirtualrealitybasedsystem