Cargando…

Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis

BACKGROUND/AIM: The role of the microbiome has been widely discussed in the etiology of appendicitis. The primary aim was to evaluate the microbiome in the normal appendix and in appendicitis specifically divided into the three clinically and histopathologically defined grades of inflammation. Secon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salö, Martin, Marungruang, Nittaya, Roth, Bodil, Sundberg, Tiia, Stenström, Pernilla, Arnbjörnsson, Einar, Fåk, Frida, Ohlsson, Bodil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5219883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27613729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2639-x
_version_ 1782492536822038528
author Salö, Martin
Marungruang, Nittaya
Roth, Bodil
Sundberg, Tiia
Stenström, Pernilla
Arnbjörnsson, Einar
Fåk, Frida
Ohlsson, Bodil
author_facet Salö, Martin
Marungruang, Nittaya
Roth, Bodil
Sundberg, Tiia
Stenström, Pernilla
Arnbjörnsson, Einar
Fåk, Frida
Ohlsson, Bodil
author_sort Salö, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: The role of the microbiome has been widely discussed in the etiology of appendicitis. The primary aim was to evaluate the microbiome in the normal appendix and in appendicitis specifically divided into the three clinically and histopathologically defined grades of inflammation. Secondary aims were to examine whether there were any microbiome differences between proximal and distal appendices, and relate the microbiome with histopathological findings. METHODS: A prospective pilot study was conducted of children undergoing appendectomy for appendicitis. The diagnosis was based on histopathological analysis. Children with incidental appendectomy were used as controls. The proximal and distal mucosa from the appendices were analyzed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 22 children, 3 controls and 19 appendicitis patients; 11 phlegmonous, 4 gangrenous, and 4 perforated appendices, were prospectively included. The amount of Fusobacterium increased and Bacteroides decreased in phlegmonous and perforated appendicitis compared to controls, but statistical significance was not reached, and this pattern was not seen in gangrenous appendicitis. No relation could be seen between different bacteria and the grade of inflammation, and there was a wide variation of abundances at phylum, genus, and species level within every specific group of patients. Further, no significant differences could be detected when comparing the microbiome in proximal and distal mucosa, which may be because the study was underpowered. A trend with more abundance of Fusobacteria in the distal mucosa was seen in appendicitis patients with obstruction (25 and 13 %, respectively, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The pattern of microbiome differed not only between groups, but also within groups. However, no statistically significant differences could be found in the microbiome between groups or clinical conditions. No correlation between a specific bacteria and grade of inflammation was found. In the vast majority of cases of appendicitis, changes in microbiome do not seem to be the primary event. Since there seem to be differences in microbiome patterns depending on the sample site, the exact localization of biopsy sampling must be described in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5219883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52198832017-01-19 Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis Salö, Martin Marungruang, Nittaya Roth, Bodil Sundberg, Tiia Stenström, Pernilla Arnbjörnsson, Einar Fåk, Frida Ohlsson, Bodil Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article BACKGROUND/AIM: The role of the microbiome has been widely discussed in the etiology of appendicitis. The primary aim was to evaluate the microbiome in the normal appendix and in appendicitis specifically divided into the three clinically and histopathologically defined grades of inflammation. Secondary aims were to examine whether there were any microbiome differences between proximal and distal appendices, and relate the microbiome with histopathological findings. METHODS: A prospective pilot study was conducted of children undergoing appendectomy for appendicitis. The diagnosis was based on histopathological analysis. Children with incidental appendectomy were used as controls. The proximal and distal mucosa from the appendices were analyzed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 22 children, 3 controls and 19 appendicitis patients; 11 phlegmonous, 4 gangrenous, and 4 perforated appendices, were prospectively included. The amount of Fusobacterium increased and Bacteroides decreased in phlegmonous and perforated appendicitis compared to controls, but statistical significance was not reached, and this pattern was not seen in gangrenous appendicitis. No relation could be seen between different bacteria and the grade of inflammation, and there was a wide variation of abundances at phylum, genus, and species level within every specific group of patients. Further, no significant differences could be detected when comparing the microbiome in proximal and distal mucosa, which may be because the study was underpowered. A trend with more abundance of Fusobacteria in the distal mucosa was seen in appendicitis patients with obstruction (25 and 13 %, respectively, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The pattern of microbiome differed not only between groups, but also within groups. However, no statistically significant differences could be found in the microbiome between groups or clinical conditions. No correlation between a specific bacteria and grade of inflammation was found. In the vast majority of cases of appendicitis, changes in microbiome do not seem to be the primary event. Since there seem to be differences in microbiome patterns depending on the sample site, the exact localization of biopsy sampling must be described in future studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5219883/ /pubmed/27613729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2639-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Salö, Martin
Marungruang, Nittaya
Roth, Bodil
Sundberg, Tiia
Stenström, Pernilla
Arnbjörnsson, Einar
Fåk, Frida
Ohlsson, Bodil
Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis
title Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis
title_full Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis
title_short Evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis
title_sort evaluation of the microbiome in children’s appendicitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5219883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27613729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2639-x
work_keys_str_mv AT salomartin evaluationofthemicrobiomeinchildrensappendicitis
AT marungruangnittaya evaluationofthemicrobiomeinchildrensappendicitis
AT rothbodil evaluationofthemicrobiomeinchildrensappendicitis
AT sundbergtiia evaluationofthemicrobiomeinchildrensappendicitis
AT stenstrompernilla evaluationofthemicrobiomeinchildrensappendicitis
AT arnbjornssoneinar evaluationofthemicrobiomeinchildrensappendicitis
AT fakfrida evaluationofthemicrobiomeinchildrensappendicitis
AT ohlssonbodil evaluationofthemicrobiomeinchildrensappendicitis