Cargando…
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs is highly dependent on consistent participation over multiple rounds. We evaluated adherence to FIT screening over four rounds and aimed to identify determinants of participation behaviour. METHODS: A total of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27923037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.399 |
_version_ | 1782492574667243520 |
---|---|
author | van der Vlugt, Manon Grobbee, Esmée J Bossuyt, Patrick MM Bongers, Evelien Spijker, Wolfert Kuipers, Ernst J Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise Spaander, Manon C W Dekker, Evelien |
author_facet | van der Vlugt, Manon Grobbee, Esmée J Bossuyt, Patrick MM Bongers, Evelien Spijker, Wolfert Kuipers, Ernst J Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise Spaander, Manon C W Dekker, Evelien |
author_sort | van der Vlugt, Manon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs is highly dependent on consistent participation over multiple rounds. We evaluated adherence to FIT screening over four rounds and aimed to identify determinants of participation behaviour. METHODS: A total of 23 339 randomly selected asymptomatic persons aged 50–74 years were invited for biennial FIT-based colorectal cancer screening between 2006 and 2014. All were invited for every consecutive round, except for those who had moved out of the area, passed the upper age limit, or had tested positive in a previous screening round. A reminder letter was sent to non-responders. We calculated participation rates per round, response rates to a reminder letter, and differences in participation between subgroups defined by age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Over the four rounds, participation rates increased significantly, from 60% (95% CI 60–61), 60% (95% CI 59–60), 62% (95% CI 61–63) to 63% (95% CI 62–64; P for trend<0.001) with significantly higher participation rates in women in all rounds (P<0.001). Of the 17 312 invitees eligible for at least two rounds of FIT screening, 12 455 (72%) participated at least once, whereas 4857 (28%) never participated; 8271 (48%) attended all rounds when eligible. Consistent participation was associated with older age, female sex, and higher SES. Offering a reminder letter after the initial invite in the first round increased uptake with 12% in subsequent screening rounds this resulted in an additional uptake of up to 10%. CONCLUSIONS: In four rounds of a pilot biennial FIT-screening program, we observed a consistently high and increasing participation rate, whereas sending reminders remain effective. The substantial proportion of inconsistent participants suggests the existence of incidental barriers to participation, which, if possible, should be identified and removed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5220157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52201572018-01-03 Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening van der Vlugt, Manon Grobbee, Esmée J Bossuyt, Patrick MM Bongers, Evelien Spijker, Wolfert Kuipers, Ernst J Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise Spaander, Manon C W Dekker, Evelien Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs is highly dependent on consistent participation over multiple rounds. We evaluated adherence to FIT screening over four rounds and aimed to identify determinants of participation behaviour. METHODS: A total of 23 339 randomly selected asymptomatic persons aged 50–74 years were invited for biennial FIT-based colorectal cancer screening between 2006 and 2014. All were invited for every consecutive round, except for those who had moved out of the area, passed the upper age limit, or had tested positive in a previous screening round. A reminder letter was sent to non-responders. We calculated participation rates per round, response rates to a reminder letter, and differences in participation between subgroups defined by age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Over the four rounds, participation rates increased significantly, from 60% (95% CI 60–61), 60% (95% CI 59–60), 62% (95% CI 61–63) to 63% (95% CI 62–64; P for trend<0.001) with significantly higher participation rates in women in all rounds (P<0.001). Of the 17 312 invitees eligible for at least two rounds of FIT screening, 12 455 (72%) participated at least once, whereas 4857 (28%) never participated; 8271 (48%) attended all rounds when eligible. Consistent participation was associated with older age, female sex, and higher SES. Offering a reminder letter after the initial invite in the first round increased uptake with 12% in subsequent screening rounds this resulted in an additional uptake of up to 10%. CONCLUSIONS: In four rounds of a pilot biennial FIT-screening program, we observed a consistently high and increasing participation rate, whereas sending reminders remain effective. The substantial proportion of inconsistent participants suggests the existence of incidental barriers to participation, which, if possible, should be identified and removed. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-03 2016-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5220157/ /pubmed/27923037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.399 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study van der Vlugt, Manon Grobbee, Esmée J Bossuyt, Patrick MM Bongers, Evelien Spijker, Wolfert Kuipers, Ernst J Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise Spaander, Manon C W Dekker, Evelien Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening |
title | Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening |
title_full | Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening |
title_fullStr | Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening |
title_short | Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening |
title_sort | adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27923037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.399 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandervlugtmanon adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT grobbeeesmeej adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT bossuytpatrickmm adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT bongersevelien adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT spijkerwolfert adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT kuipersernstj adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT lansdorpvogelaariris adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT essinkbotmarielouise adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT spaandermanoncw adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening AT dekkerevelien adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening |