Cargando…

Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs is highly dependent on consistent participation over multiple rounds. We evaluated adherence to FIT screening over four rounds and aimed to identify determinants of participation behaviour. METHODS: A total of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Vlugt, Manon, Grobbee, Esmée J, Bossuyt, Patrick MM, Bongers, Evelien, Spijker, Wolfert, Kuipers, Ernst J, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise, Spaander, Manon C W, Dekker, Evelien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27923037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.399
_version_ 1782492574667243520
author van der Vlugt, Manon
Grobbee, Esmée J
Bossuyt, Patrick MM
Bongers, Evelien
Spijker, Wolfert
Kuipers, Ernst J
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
Spaander, Manon C W
Dekker, Evelien
author_facet van der Vlugt, Manon
Grobbee, Esmée J
Bossuyt, Patrick MM
Bongers, Evelien
Spijker, Wolfert
Kuipers, Ernst J
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
Spaander, Manon C W
Dekker, Evelien
author_sort van der Vlugt, Manon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs is highly dependent on consistent participation over multiple rounds. We evaluated adherence to FIT screening over four rounds and aimed to identify determinants of participation behaviour. METHODS: A total of 23 339 randomly selected asymptomatic persons aged 50–74 years were invited for biennial FIT-based colorectal cancer screening between 2006 and 2014. All were invited for every consecutive round, except for those who had moved out of the area, passed the upper age limit, or had tested positive in a previous screening round. A reminder letter was sent to non-responders. We calculated participation rates per round, response rates to a reminder letter, and differences in participation between subgroups defined by age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Over the four rounds, participation rates increased significantly, from 60% (95% CI 60–61), 60% (95% CI 59–60), 62% (95% CI 61–63) to 63% (95% CI 62–64; P for trend<0.001) with significantly higher participation rates in women in all rounds (P<0.001). Of the 17 312 invitees eligible for at least two rounds of FIT screening, 12 455 (72%) participated at least once, whereas 4857 (28%) never participated; 8271 (48%) attended all rounds when eligible. Consistent participation was associated with older age, female sex, and higher SES. Offering a reminder letter after the initial invite in the first round increased uptake with 12% in subsequent screening rounds this resulted in an additional uptake of up to 10%. CONCLUSIONS: In four rounds of a pilot biennial FIT-screening program, we observed a consistently high and increasing participation rate, whereas sending reminders remain effective. The substantial proportion of inconsistent participants suggests the existence of incidental barriers to participation, which, if possible, should be identified and removed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5220157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52201572018-01-03 Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening van der Vlugt, Manon Grobbee, Esmée J Bossuyt, Patrick MM Bongers, Evelien Spijker, Wolfert Kuipers, Ernst J Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise Spaander, Manon C W Dekker, Evelien Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs is highly dependent on consistent participation over multiple rounds. We evaluated adherence to FIT screening over four rounds and aimed to identify determinants of participation behaviour. METHODS: A total of 23 339 randomly selected asymptomatic persons aged 50–74 years were invited for biennial FIT-based colorectal cancer screening between 2006 and 2014. All were invited for every consecutive round, except for those who had moved out of the area, passed the upper age limit, or had tested positive in a previous screening round. A reminder letter was sent to non-responders. We calculated participation rates per round, response rates to a reminder letter, and differences in participation between subgroups defined by age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Over the four rounds, participation rates increased significantly, from 60% (95% CI 60–61), 60% (95% CI 59–60), 62% (95% CI 61–63) to 63% (95% CI 62–64; P for trend<0.001) with significantly higher participation rates in women in all rounds (P<0.001). Of the 17 312 invitees eligible for at least two rounds of FIT screening, 12 455 (72%) participated at least once, whereas 4857 (28%) never participated; 8271 (48%) attended all rounds when eligible. Consistent participation was associated with older age, female sex, and higher SES. Offering a reminder letter after the initial invite in the first round increased uptake with 12% in subsequent screening rounds this resulted in an additional uptake of up to 10%. CONCLUSIONS: In four rounds of a pilot biennial FIT-screening program, we observed a consistently high and increasing participation rate, whereas sending reminders remain effective. The substantial proportion of inconsistent participants suggests the existence of incidental barriers to participation, which, if possible, should be identified and removed. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-03 2016-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5220157/ /pubmed/27923037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.399 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
van der Vlugt, Manon
Grobbee, Esmée J
Bossuyt, Patrick MM
Bongers, Evelien
Spijker, Wolfert
Kuipers, Ernst J
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
Spaander, Manon C W
Dekker, Evelien
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
title Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
title_full Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
title_fullStr Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
title_short Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
title_sort adherence to colorectal cancer screening: four rounds of faecal immunochemical test-based screening
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27923037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.399
work_keys_str_mv AT vandervlugtmanon adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT grobbeeesmeej adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT bossuytpatrickmm adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT bongersevelien adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT spijkerwolfert adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT kuipersernstj adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT lansdorpvogelaariris adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT essinkbotmarielouise adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT spaandermanoncw adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening
AT dekkerevelien adherencetocolorectalcancerscreeningfourroundsoffaecalimmunochemicaltestbasedscreening