Cargando…

Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region

OBJECTIVE: To examine disparities in the receipt of preventive care recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) between Appalachian and non-Appalachian counties and within Appalachian counties. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data for 2008–2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohn, Min-Woong, Kang, Hyojung, Park, Joseph S, Yates, Paul, McCall, Anthony, Stukenborg, George, Anderson, Roger, Balkrishnan, Rajesh, Lobo, Jennifer M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000284
_version_ 1782492594714968064
author Sohn, Min-Woong
Kang, Hyojung
Park, Joseph S
Yates, Paul
McCall, Anthony
Stukenborg, George
Anderson, Roger
Balkrishnan, Rajesh
Lobo, Jennifer M
author_facet Sohn, Min-Woong
Kang, Hyojung
Park, Joseph S
Yates, Paul
McCall, Anthony
Stukenborg, George
Anderson, Roger
Balkrishnan, Rajesh
Lobo, Jennifer M
author_sort Sohn, Min-Woong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine disparities in the receipt of preventive care recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) between Appalachian and non-Appalachian counties and within Appalachian counties. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data for 2008–2010 were used to identify individuals with diabetes and their preventive care usage. Each Appalachian respondent county of residence was categorised into one of the five economic levels: distressed, at-risk, transitional, competitive and attainment counties. Competitive and attainment counties were combined and designated as competitive counties. We used logistic regressions to compare receipt of ADA preventive care recommendations by county economic level, adjusting for respondent demographic, socioeconomic, health and access-to-care factors. RESULTS: Compared to the most affluent (competitive) counties, less affluent (distressed and at-risk) counties demonstrated equivalent or higher rates of self-care practices such as daily blood glucose monitoring and daily foot checks. But they showed 40–50% lower uptake of annual foot and eye examinations and 30% lower uptake of diabetes education and pneumococcal vaccinations compared to competitive counties. After adjusting for demographic factors, significant disparities still existed in the uptake of annual foot examinations, annual eye examinations, 2 or more A1c tests per year and pneumococcal vaccinations in distressed and at-risk counties compared to competitive counties. Appalachian counties as a whole were similar to non-Appalachian counties in the uptake of all recommendations with the absolute differences of ≤3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that there are significant disparities in the uptake of many recommended preventive services between less and more affluent counties in the Appalachian region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5220277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52202772017-01-10 Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region Sohn, Min-Woong Kang, Hyojung Park, Joseph S Yates, Paul McCall, Anthony Stukenborg, George Anderson, Roger Balkrishnan, Rajesh Lobo, Jennifer M BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To examine disparities in the receipt of preventive care recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) between Appalachian and non-Appalachian counties and within Appalachian counties. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data for 2008–2010 were used to identify individuals with diabetes and their preventive care usage. Each Appalachian respondent county of residence was categorised into one of the five economic levels: distressed, at-risk, transitional, competitive and attainment counties. Competitive and attainment counties were combined and designated as competitive counties. We used logistic regressions to compare receipt of ADA preventive care recommendations by county economic level, adjusting for respondent demographic, socioeconomic, health and access-to-care factors. RESULTS: Compared to the most affluent (competitive) counties, less affluent (distressed and at-risk) counties demonstrated equivalent or higher rates of self-care practices such as daily blood glucose monitoring and daily foot checks. But they showed 40–50% lower uptake of annual foot and eye examinations and 30% lower uptake of diabetes education and pneumococcal vaccinations compared to competitive counties. After adjusting for demographic factors, significant disparities still existed in the uptake of annual foot examinations, annual eye examinations, 2 or more A1c tests per year and pneumococcal vaccinations in distressed and at-risk counties compared to competitive counties. Appalachian counties as a whole were similar to non-Appalachian counties in the uptake of all recommendations with the absolute differences of ≤3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that there are significant disparities in the uptake of many recommended preventive services between less and more affluent counties in the Appalachian region. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5220277/ /pubmed/28074140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000284 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health Services Research
Sohn, Min-Woong
Kang, Hyojung
Park, Joseph S
Yates, Paul
McCall, Anthony
Stukenborg, George
Anderson, Roger
Balkrishnan, Rajesh
Lobo, Jennifer M
Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region
title Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region
title_full Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region
title_fullStr Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region
title_short Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region
title_sort disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the appalachian region
topic Epidemiology/Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000284
work_keys_str_mv AT sohnminwoong disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion
AT kanghyojung disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion
AT parkjosephs disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion
AT yatespaul disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion
AT mccallanthony disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion
AT stukenborggeorge disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion
AT andersonroger disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion
AT balkrishnanrajesh disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion
AT lobojenniferm disparitiesinrecommendedpreventivecareusageamongpersonslivingwithdiabetesintheappalachianregion