Cargando…

Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods

For the definitive diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis, isolation of the etiologic agent is required. However, there is no consensus on the best methodology for isolation of Mycobacterium bovis in Brazil. This study evaluated the most used decontaminants and culture media in the country, in order to id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Azevedo Issa, Marina, Martins Soares Filho, Paulo, Fonseca Júnior, Antônio Augusto, Arrais Hodon, Mikael, Cristian dos Santos, Lílian, Karlisson Pimenta dos Reis, Jenner, Cerqueira Leite, Rômulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.07.026
_version_ 1782492654964047872
author de Azevedo Issa, Marina
Martins Soares Filho, Paulo
Fonseca Júnior, Antônio Augusto
Arrais Hodon, Mikael
Cristian dos Santos, Lílian
Karlisson Pimenta dos Reis, Jenner
Cerqueira Leite, Rômulo
author_facet de Azevedo Issa, Marina
Martins Soares Filho, Paulo
Fonseca Júnior, Antônio Augusto
Arrais Hodon, Mikael
Cristian dos Santos, Lílian
Karlisson Pimenta dos Reis, Jenner
Cerqueira Leite, Rômulo
author_sort de Azevedo Issa, Marina
collection PubMed
description For the definitive diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis, isolation of the etiologic agent is required. However, there is no consensus on the best methodology for isolation of Mycobacterium bovis in Brazil. This study evaluated the most used decontaminants and culture media in the country, in order to identify the best combination for the Brazilian samples. Three decontaminants – 2% sodium hydroxide (w/v), 0.75% hexadecylpiridinium chloride (w/v) and 5% sulphuric acid (v/v) and four culture media – 7H11 Middlebrook with additives and OADC supplement “A” (7H11 A), the same media with another supplement trademark (7H11 B), tuberculosis blood agar (B83) and Stonebrink's medium were compared. Regarding the isolation, there were no significant differences between the decontaminants and media combinations, except 7H11A combined to any decontaminant. However, the mean colonies score was significantly greater when the samples were decontaminated with 5% sulphuric acid and inoculated in 7H11 B or SB, without significant difference between them, although colonies appeared earlier on 7H11B than on SB. The trademark of OADC supplement influenced the isolation rate and the number of isolated colonies in Middlebrook 7H11. An incubation time of four weeks was required to detect all positive samples in 7H11 B after decontamination with 5% sulphuric acid but there was an increase in the number of colonies until the sixth week of incubation. Overall, the best strategy for the primary isolation of M. bovis from Brazilian samples was the decontamination with 5% sulphuric acid (final concentration) and inoculation in Middlebrook 7H11 medium formulated with OADC supplement “B”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5220631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52206312017-01-18 Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods de Azevedo Issa, Marina Martins Soares Filho, Paulo Fonseca Júnior, Antônio Augusto Arrais Hodon, Mikael Cristian dos Santos, Lílian Karlisson Pimenta dos Reis, Jenner Cerqueira Leite, Rômulo Braz J Microbiol Veterinary Microbiology For the definitive diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis, isolation of the etiologic agent is required. However, there is no consensus on the best methodology for isolation of Mycobacterium bovis in Brazil. This study evaluated the most used decontaminants and culture media in the country, in order to identify the best combination for the Brazilian samples. Three decontaminants – 2% sodium hydroxide (w/v), 0.75% hexadecylpiridinium chloride (w/v) and 5% sulphuric acid (v/v) and four culture media – 7H11 Middlebrook with additives and OADC supplement “A” (7H11 A), the same media with another supplement trademark (7H11 B), tuberculosis blood agar (B83) and Stonebrink's medium were compared. Regarding the isolation, there were no significant differences between the decontaminants and media combinations, except 7H11A combined to any decontaminant. However, the mean colonies score was significantly greater when the samples were decontaminated with 5% sulphuric acid and inoculated in 7H11 B or SB, without significant difference between them, although colonies appeared earlier on 7H11B than on SB. The trademark of OADC supplement influenced the isolation rate and the number of isolated colonies in Middlebrook 7H11. An incubation time of four weeks was required to detect all positive samples in 7H11 B after decontamination with 5% sulphuric acid but there was an increase in the number of colonies until the sixth week of incubation. Overall, the best strategy for the primary isolation of M. bovis from Brazilian samples was the decontamination with 5% sulphuric acid (final concentration) and inoculation in Middlebrook 7H11 medium formulated with OADC supplement “B”. Elsevier 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5220631/ /pubmed/27818094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.07.026 Text en © 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Veterinary Microbiology
de Azevedo Issa, Marina
Martins Soares Filho, Paulo
Fonseca Júnior, Antônio Augusto
Arrais Hodon, Mikael
Cristian dos Santos, Lílian
Karlisson Pimenta dos Reis, Jenner
Cerqueira Leite, Rômulo
Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods
title Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods
title_full Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods
title_fullStr Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods
title_short Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods
title_sort comparative study of mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods
topic Veterinary Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.07.026
work_keys_str_mv AT deazevedoissamarina comparativestudyofmycobacteriumbovisprimaryisolationmethods
AT martinssoaresfilhopaulo comparativestudyofmycobacteriumbovisprimaryisolationmethods
AT fonsecajuniorantonioaugusto comparativestudyofmycobacteriumbovisprimaryisolationmethods
AT arraishodonmikael comparativestudyofmycobacteriumbovisprimaryisolationmethods
AT cristiandossantoslilian comparativestudyofmycobacteriumbovisprimaryisolationmethods
AT karlissonpimentadosreisjenner comparativestudyofmycobacteriumbovisprimaryisolationmethods
AT cerqueiraleiteromulo comparativestudyofmycobacteriumbovisprimaryisolationmethods