Cargando…
A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of three methods of using intravenous (IV), subcutaneous and intranasal (IN) fentanyl for pain management following general anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, random...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217636 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.190989 |
_version_ | 1782492659985678336 |
---|---|
author | Jabalameli, Mitra Talakoub, Reihanak Abedi, Bita Ghofrani, Zahra |
author_facet | Jabalameli, Mitra Talakoub, Reihanak Abedi, Bita Ghofrani, Zahra |
author_sort | Jabalameli, Mitra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of three methods of using intravenous (IV), subcutaneous and intranasal (IN) fentanyl for pain management following general anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was done on 75 patients aged 20–40 years, American Society of Anesthesiology-1, who had a normal singleton pregnancy beyond 36 weeks of gestational age. Patients were randomized to receive 50 μg fentanyl intravenously (Group 1), subcutaneously (Group 2) or intranasally (Group 3) after closure of incision. The pain intensity, nausea, the systolic, and diastolic blood pressures were assessed. RESULTS: All groups were equivalent for baseline characteristics. The average pain visual analog scale (VAS) score was less in the second group who received fentanyl subcutaneously at the time of recovery admission (6.8 ± 1.5) (P = 0.037) and after 3 h (6.36 ± 1.5) (P = 0.033) postoperatively. The mean VAS score of nausea and the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were not significantly different between three groups throughout the study (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: subcutaneous fentanyl is an effective alternative to IV and IN route of administration for pain management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5220687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52206872017-02-17 A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section Jabalameli, Mitra Talakoub, Reihanak Abedi, Bita Ghofrani, Zahra Adv Biomed Res Brief Report BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of three methods of using intravenous (IV), subcutaneous and intranasal (IN) fentanyl for pain management following general anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was done on 75 patients aged 20–40 years, American Society of Anesthesiology-1, who had a normal singleton pregnancy beyond 36 weeks of gestational age. Patients were randomized to receive 50 μg fentanyl intravenously (Group 1), subcutaneously (Group 2) or intranasally (Group 3) after closure of incision. The pain intensity, nausea, the systolic, and diastolic blood pressures were assessed. RESULTS: All groups were equivalent for baseline characteristics. The average pain visual analog scale (VAS) score was less in the second group who received fentanyl subcutaneously at the time of recovery admission (6.8 ± 1.5) (P = 0.037) and after 3 h (6.36 ± 1.5) (P = 0.033) postoperatively. The mean VAS score of nausea and the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were not significantly different between three groups throughout the study (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: subcutaneous fentanyl is an effective alternative to IV and IN route of administration for pain management. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5220687/ /pubmed/28217636 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.190989 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Advanced Biomedical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Jabalameli, Mitra Talakoub, Reihanak Abedi, Bita Ghofrani, Zahra A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section |
title | A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section |
title_full | A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section |
title_fullStr | A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section |
title_short | A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217636 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.190989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jabalamelimitra arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection AT talakoubreihanak arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection AT abedibita arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection AT ghofranizahra arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection AT jabalamelimitra randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection AT talakoubreihanak randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection AT abedibita randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection AT ghofranizahra randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection |