Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of three methods of using intravenous (IV), subcutaneous and intranasal (IN) fentanyl for pain management following general anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jabalameli, Mitra, Talakoub, Reihanak, Abedi, Bita, Ghofrani, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217636
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.190989
_version_ 1782492659985678336
author Jabalameli, Mitra
Talakoub, Reihanak
Abedi, Bita
Ghofrani, Zahra
author_facet Jabalameli, Mitra
Talakoub, Reihanak
Abedi, Bita
Ghofrani, Zahra
author_sort Jabalameli, Mitra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of three methods of using intravenous (IV), subcutaneous and intranasal (IN) fentanyl for pain management following general anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was done on 75 patients aged 20–40 years, American Society of Anesthesiology-1, who had a normal singleton pregnancy beyond 36 weeks of gestational age. Patients were randomized to receive 50 μg fentanyl intravenously (Group 1), subcutaneously (Group 2) or intranasally (Group 3) after closure of incision. The pain intensity, nausea, the systolic, and diastolic blood pressures were assessed. RESULTS: All groups were equivalent for baseline characteristics. The average pain visual analog scale (VAS) score was less in the second group who received fentanyl subcutaneously at the time of recovery admission (6.8 ± 1.5) (P = 0.037) and after 3 h (6.36 ± 1.5) (P = 0.033) postoperatively. The mean VAS score of nausea and the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were not significantly different between three groups throughout the study (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: subcutaneous fentanyl is an effective alternative to IV and IN route of administration for pain management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5220687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52206872017-02-17 A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section Jabalameli, Mitra Talakoub, Reihanak Abedi, Bita Ghofrani, Zahra Adv Biomed Res Brief Report BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of three methods of using intravenous (IV), subcutaneous and intranasal (IN) fentanyl for pain management following general anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was done on 75 patients aged 20–40 years, American Society of Anesthesiology-1, who had a normal singleton pregnancy beyond 36 weeks of gestational age. Patients were randomized to receive 50 μg fentanyl intravenously (Group 1), subcutaneously (Group 2) or intranasally (Group 3) after closure of incision. The pain intensity, nausea, the systolic, and diastolic blood pressures were assessed. RESULTS: All groups were equivalent for baseline characteristics. The average pain visual analog scale (VAS) score was less in the second group who received fentanyl subcutaneously at the time of recovery admission (6.8 ± 1.5) (P = 0.037) and after 3 h (6.36 ± 1.5) (P = 0.033) postoperatively. The mean VAS score of nausea and the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were not significantly different between three groups throughout the study (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: subcutaneous fentanyl is an effective alternative to IV and IN route of administration for pain management. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5220687/ /pubmed/28217636 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.190989 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Advanced Biomedical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Jabalameli, Mitra
Talakoub, Reihanak
Abedi, Bita
Ghofrani, Zahra
A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section
title A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of intravenous, subcutaneous, and intranasal fentanyl for pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217636
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.190989
work_keys_str_mv AT jabalamelimitra arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection
AT talakoubreihanak arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection
AT abedibita arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection
AT ghofranizahra arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection
AT jabalamelimitra randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection
AT talakoubreihanak randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection
AT abedibita randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection
AT ghofranizahra randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectofintravenoussubcutaneousandintranasalfentanylforpainmanagementinpatientsundergoingcesareansection