Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain

OBJECTIVE: According to a recent randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the combination of voriconazole and anidulafungin (VOR+ANI) with VOR monotherapy for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients with hematologic disease or with hematopoietic stem cell transplant, mortality was lower aft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grau, Santiago, Azanza, Jose Ramon, Ruiz, Isabel, Vallejo, Carlos, Mensa, Josep, Maertens, Johan, Heinz, Werner J, Barrueta, Jon Andoni, Peral, Carmen, Mesa, Francisco Jesús, Barrado, Miguel, Charbonneau, Claudie, Rubio-Rodríguez, Darío, Rubio-Terrés, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115858
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S122177
_version_ 1782492830364598272
author Grau, Santiago
Azanza, Jose Ramon
Ruiz, Isabel
Vallejo, Carlos
Mensa, Josep
Maertens, Johan
Heinz, Werner J
Barrueta, Jon Andoni
Peral, Carmen
Mesa, Francisco Jesús
Barrado, Miguel
Charbonneau, Claudie
Rubio-Rodríguez, Darío
Rubio-Terrés, Carlos
author_facet Grau, Santiago
Azanza, Jose Ramon
Ruiz, Isabel
Vallejo, Carlos
Mensa, Josep
Maertens, Johan
Heinz, Werner J
Barrueta, Jon Andoni
Peral, Carmen
Mesa, Francisco Jesús
Barrado, Miguel
Charbonneau, Claudie
Rubio-Rodríguez, Darío
Rubio-Terrés, Carlos
author_sort Grau, Santiago
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: According to a recent randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the combination of voriconazole and anidulafungin (VOR+ANI) with VOR monotherapy for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients with hematologic disease or with hematopoietic stem cell transplant, mortality was lower after 6 weeks with VOR+ANI than with VOR monotherapy in a post hoc analysis of patients with galactomannan-based IA. The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of VOR+ANI with VOR, from the perspective of hospitals in the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: An economic model with deterministic and probabilistic analyses was used to determine costs per life-year gained (LYG) for VOR+ANI versus VOR in patients with galactomannan-based IA. Mortality, adverse event rates, and life expectancy were obtained from clinical trial data. The costs (in 2015 euros [€]) of the drugs and the adverse event-related costs were obtained from Spanish sources. A Tornado plot and a Monte Carlo simulation (1,000 iterations) were used to assess uncertainty of all model variables. RESULTS: According to the deterministic analysis, for each patient treated with VOR+ANI compared with VOR monotherapy, there would be a total of 0.348 LYG (2.529 vs 2.181 years, respectively) at an incremental cost of €5,493 (€17,902 vs €12,409, respectively). Consequently, the additional cost per LYG with VOR+ANI compared with VOR would be €15,785. Deterministic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. In the probabilistic analysis, the cost per LYG with VOR+ANI was €15,774 (95% confidence interval: €15,763–16,692). The probability of VOR+ANI being cost-effective compared with VOR was estimated at 82.5% and 91.9%, based on local cost-effectiveness thresholds of €30,000 and €45,000, respectively. CONCLUSION: According to the present economic study, combination therapy with VOR+ANI is cost-effective as primary therapy of IA in galactomannan-positive patients in Spain who have hematologic disease or hematopoietic stem cell transplant, compared with VOR monotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5221484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52214842017-01-23 Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain Grau, Santiago Azanza, Jose Ramon Ruiz, Isabel Vallejo, Carlos Mensa, Josep Maertens, Johan Heinz, Werner J Barrueta, Jon Andoni Peral, Carmen Mesa, Francisco Jesús Barrado, Miguel Charbonneau, Claudie Rubio-Rodríguez, Darío Rubio-Terrés, Carlos Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: According to a recent randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the combination of voriconazole and anidulafungin (VOR+ANI) with VOR monotherapy for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients with hematologic disease or with hematopoietic stem cell transplant, mortality was lower after 6 weeks with VOR+ANI than with VOR monotherapy in a post hoc analysis of patients with galactomannan-based IA. The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of VOR+ANI with VOR, from the perspective of hospitals in the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: An economic model with deterministic and probabilistic analyses was used to determine costs per life-year gained (LYG) for VOR+ANI versus VOR in patients with galactomannan-based IA. Mortality, adverse event rates, and life expectancy were obtained from clinical trial data. The costs (in 2015 euros [€]) of the drugs and the adverse event-related costs were obtained from Spanish sources. A Tornado plot and a Monte Carlo simulation (1,000 iterations) were used to assess uncertainty of all model variables. RESULTS: According to the deterministic analysis, for each patient treated with VOR+ANI compared with VOR monotherapy, there would be a total of 0.348 LYG (2.529 vs 2.181 years, respectively) at an incremental cost of €5,493 (€17,902 vs €12,409, respectively). Consequently, the additional cost per LYG with VOR+ANI compared with VOR would be €15,785. Deterministic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. In the probabilistic analysis, the cost per LYG with VOR+ANI was €15,774 (95% confidence interval: €15,763–16,692). The probability of VOR+ANI being cost-effective compared with VOR was estimated at 82.5% and 91.9%, based on local cost-effectiveness thresholds of €30,000 and €45,000, respectively. CONCLUSION: According to the present economic study, combination therapy with VOR+ANI is cost-effective as primary therapy of IA in galactomannan-positive patients in Spain who have hematologic disease or hematopoietic stem cell transplant, compared with VOR monotherapy. Dove Medical Press 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5221484/ /pubmed/28115858 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S122177 Text en © 2017 Grau et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Grau, Santiago
Azanza, Jose Ramon
Ruiz, Isabel
Vallejo, Carlos
Mensa, Josep
Maertens, Johan
Heinz, Werner J
Barrueta, Jon Andoni
Peral, Carmen
Mesa, Francisco Jesús
Barrado, Miguel
Charbonneau, Claudie
Rubio-Rodríguez, Darío
Rubio-Terrés, Carlos
Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in spain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115858
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S122177
work_keys_str_mv AT grausantiago costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT azanzajoseramon costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT ruizisabel costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT vallejocarlos costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT mensajosep costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT maertensjohan costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT heinzwernerj costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT barruetajonandoni costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT peralcarmen costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT mesafranciscojesus costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT barradomiguel costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT charbonneauclaudie costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT rubiorodriguezdario costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain
AT rubioterrescarlos costeffectivenessanalysisofcombinationantifungaltherapywithvoriconazoleandanidulafunginversusvoriconazolemonotherapyforprimarytreatmentofinvasiveaspergillosisinspain