Cargando…
Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction
Decades before the existence of anything resembling an artificial intelligence system, Alan Turing raised the question of how to test whether machines can think, or, in modern terminology, whether a computer claimed to exhibit intelligence indeed does so. This paper raises the analogous issue for ol...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0587 |
_version_ | 1782492838005571584 |
---|---|
author | Harel, David |
author_facet | Harel, David |
author_sort | Harel, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Decades before the existence of anything resembling an artificial intelligence system, Alan Turing raised the question of how to test whether machines can think, or, in modern terminology, whether a computer claimed to exhibit intelligence indeed does so. This paper raises the analogous issue for olfaction: how to test the validity of a system claimed to reproduce arbitrary odours artificially, in a way recognizable to humans. Although odour reproduction systems are still far from being viable, the question of how to test candidates thereof is claimed to be interesting and non-trivial, and a novel method is proposed. Despite the similarity between the two questions and their surfacing long before the tested systems exist, the present question cannot be answered adequately by a Turing-like method. Instead, our test is very different: it is conditional, requiring from the artificial no more than is required from the original, and it employs a novel method of immersion that takes advantage of the availability of easily recognizable reproduction methods for sight and sound, a la Nicéphore Niépce and Alexander Graham Bell. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5221521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52215212017-01-10 Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction Harel, David J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Mathematics interface Decades before the existence of anything resembling an artificial intelligence system, Alan Turing raised the question of how to test whether machines can think, or, in modern terminology, whether a computer claimed to exhibit intelligence indeed does so. This paper raises the analogous issue for olfaction: how to test the validity of a system claimed to reproduce arbitrary odours artificially, in a way recognizable to humans. Although odour reproduction systems are still far from being viable, the question of how to test candidates thereof is claimed to be interesting and non-trivial, and a novel method is proposed. Despite the similarity between the two questions and their surfacing long before the tested systems exist, the present question cannot be answered adequately by a Turing-like method. Instead, our test is very different: it is conditional, requiring from the artificial no more than is required from the original, and it employs a novel method of immersion that takes advantage of the availability of easily recognizable reproduction methods for sight and sound, a la Nicéphore Niépce and Alexander Graham Bell. The Royal Society 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5221521/ /pubmed/28003527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0587 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Life Sciences–Mathematics interface Harel, David Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction |
title | Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction |
title_full | Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction |
title_fullStr | Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction |
title_short | Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction |
title_sort | niépce–bell or turing: how to test odour reproduction |
topic | Life Sciences–Mathematics interface |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hareldavid niepcebellorturinghowtotestodourreproduction |