Cargando…

Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction

Decades before the existence of anything resembling an artificial intelligence system, Alan Turing raised the question of how to test whether machines can think, or, in modern terminology, whether a computer claimed to exhibit intelligence indeed does so. This paper raises the analogous issue for ol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Harel, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0587
_version_ 1782492838005571584
author Harel, David
author_facet Harel, David
author_sort Harel, David
collection PubMed
description Decades before the existence of anything resembling an artificial intelligence system, Alan Turing raised the question of how to test whether machines can think, or, in modern terminology, whether a computer claimed to exhibit intelligence indeed does so. This paper raises the analogous issue for olfaction: how to test the validity of a system claimed to reproduce arbitrary odours artificially, in a way recognizable to humans. Although odour reproduction systems are still far from being viable, the question of how to test candidates thereof is claimed to be interesting and non-trivial, and a novel method is proposed. Despite the similarity between the two questions and their surfacing long before the tested systems exist, the present question cannot be answered adequately by a Turing-like method. Instead, our test is very different: it is conditional, requiring from the artificial no more than is required from the original, and it employs a novel method of immersion that takes advantage of the availability of easily recognizable reproduction methods for sight and sound, a la Nicéphore Niépce and Alexander Graham Bell.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5221521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52215212017-01-10 Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction Harel, David J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Mathematics interface Decades before the existence of anything resembling an artificial intelligence system, Alan Turing raised the question of how to test whether machines can think, or, in modern terminology, whether a computer claimed to exhibit intelligence indeed does so. This paper raises the analogous issue for olfaction: how to test the validity of a system claimed to reproduce arbitrary odours artificially, in a way recognizable to humans. Although odour reproduction systems are still far from being viable, the question of how to test candidates thereof is claimed to be interesting and non-trivial, and a novel method is proposed. Despite the similarity between the two questions and their surfacing long before the tested systems exist, the present question cannot be answered adequately by a Turing-like method. Instead, our test is very different: it is conditional, requiring from the artificial no more than is required from the original, and it employs a novel method of immersion that takes advantage of the availability of easily recognizable reproduction methods for sight and sound, a la Nicéphore Niépce and Alexander Graham Bell. The Royal Society 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5221521/ /pubmed/28003527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0587 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Life Sciences–Mathematics interface
Harel, David
Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction
title Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction
title_full Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction
title_fullStr Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction
title_full_unstemmed Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction
title_short Niépce–Bell or Turing: how to test odour reproduction
title_sort niépce–bell or turing: how to test odour reproduction
topic Life Sciences–Mathematics interface
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0587
work_keys_str_mv AT hareldavid niepcebellorturinghowtotestodourreproduction