Cargando…
How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study
INTRODUCTION: First-in-class drugs use a unique mechanism of action. This study assessed the therapeutic innovativeness and safety of these drugs approved by Health Canada from 1997–2012. METHODS: A list of new drugs was compiled and a database from the Food and Drug Administration was used to deter...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Longwoods Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28032825 |
_version_ | 1782492868095508480 |
---|---|
author | Lexchin, Joel |
author_facet | Lexchin, Joel |
author_sort | Lexchin, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: First-in-class drugs use a unique mechanism of action. This study assessed the therapeutic innovativeness and safety of these drugs approved by Health Canada from 1997–2012. METHODS: A list of new drugs was compiled and a database from the Food and Drug Administration was used to determine first-in-class status. Post-market safety warnings and drugs withdrawn for safety reasons were identified from the MedEffect Canada website. Therapeutic innovation evaluations came from the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) and Prescrire International. The proportion of first-in-class drugs that were innovative was compared to the proportion of non-first-in-class drugs that were innovative. Kaplan–Meier survival curves assessed safety. RESULTS: In all, 462 drugs were approved by Health Canada during the period under study. Among these, 345 were evaluated by PMPRB and/or Prescrire, and first-in-class data were available for 292. Ninety-eight of the 292 were first-in-class and 16 were innovative compared to 9 of 194 drugs that were not-first-in-class. There was no difference in safety between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Overall, the benefit-to-harm ratio of first-in-class drugs, as measured by post-market safety warnings/withdrawals, is better than those that were not-first-in-class. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5221712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Longwoods Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52217122017-11-01 How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study Lexchin, Joel Healthc Policy Research Paper INTRODUCTION: First-in-class drugs use a unique mechanism of action. This study assessed the therapeutic innovativeness and safety of these drugs approved by Health Canada from 1997–2012. METHODS: A list of new drugs was compiled and a database from the Food and Drug Administration was used to determine first-in-class status. Post-market safety warnings and drugs withdrawn for safety reasons were identified from the MedEffect Canada website. Therapeutic innovation evaluations came from the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) and Prescrire International. The proportion of first-in-class drugs that were innovative was compared to the proportion of non-first-in-class drugs that were innovative. Kaplan–Meier survival curves assessed safety. RESULTS: In all, 462 drugs were approved by Health Canada during the period under study. Among these, 345 were evaluated by PMPRB and/or Prescrire, and first-in-class data were available for 292. Ninety-eight of the 292 were first-in-class and 16 were innovative compared to 9 of 194 drugs that were not-first-in-class. There was no difference in safety between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Overall, the benefit-to-harm ratio of first-in-class drugs, as measured by post-market safety warnings/withdrawals, is better than those that were not-first-in-class. Longwoods Publishing 2016-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5221712/ /pubmed/28032825 Text en Copyright © 2016 Longwoods Publishing http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License, which permits rights to copy and redistribute the work for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is given proper attribution. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Lexchin, Joel How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study |
title | How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study |
title_full | How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study |
title_short | How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study |
title_sort | how safe and innovative are first-in-class drugs approved by health canada: a cohort study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5221712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28032825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lexchinjoel howsafeandinnovativearefirstinclassdrugsapprovedbyhealthcanadaacohortstudy |